Alexa is huge. Amazon’s still trying to find all the things it’s good for.

Amazon built a technology people like. Now it has to build an ecosystem around Alexa, so it can be bigger than Amazon.

An Amazon Echo on a bar table.

The Echo is popular, but it may not be the most important part of Alexa's future.

Photo: Amazon

There was a period of time during Amazon's development of Alexa and the Echo that Paul Bernard didn't see it going anywhere. "I'd been part of the beta team that experimented with it," he said, "and quite frankly, very early on, I was like, 'this isn't going to work.'" But Bernard, who was at the time a relatively new corporate development executive at the company, was quickly proven wrong. Amazon launched the Echo in 2014, it didn't do much and didn't do it all very well, but people loved it anyway.

Once it was clear the Alexa team was onto something, Bernard started brainstorming how his team might be able to help this new platform take off. They could buy a bunch of related companies, but that didn't feel big enough. They could do some commercial partnerships, but too many of those end up being a waste of time.

Bernard knew Amazon was going to launch two products — the Alexa Skills Kit and the Alexa Voice Service — that would let developers build their own stuff on top of Amazon's tech and devices. And the company had a long history of investing in other companies, though mostly in a non-systemic way. So Bernard and his team decided, maybe they should become venture capitalists. They wrote a proposal for a VC fund that would live inside Amazon, and spend the company's money investing in startups doing Alexa- and voice-related stuff. They presented it to Jeff Bezos, who bought in fast. "Jeff was like, 'I love it, let's go do it,'" Bernard said. The Fund was given $100 million to spend (it now has double that). "And I was like, oh god, I have to figure this out now."

The goal was simple enough: to create startup momentum around Alexa, and get interesting developers working on interesting projects on the platform. This playbook isn't unique to Amazon, by the way. The iPhone's success — both as a business in its own right and as proof that a thriving ecosystem makes any product better — taught a generation of tech companies about the value of third-party developers. Zoom's venture arm is funding video-first companies; Facebook has invested in and worked with lots of VR developers.

In a way, this ecosystem is uniquely important for companies building virtual assistants. They're designed to be ambient, trusted companions, and that only truly works when they're practically omnipresent and omnipotent. Aaron Rubenson, the vice president of the Alexa Voice Service at Amazon, likes to call Alexa a "digital fabric." "And for that digital fabric to be useful to customers, it has to be available everywhere that customers expect to be able to interact with their AI," he said. "And we recognize that we can't build everything." Assistants that know baseball scores but not song lyrics aren't useful; neither are ones that work in the living room but not in the kitchen.

Around the industry, there's a sense that the moment is right now to make a voice ecosystem happen. More than 58 million smart speakers were shipped in last year's holiday season alone, according to Strategy Analytics, and the whole space has grown quickly over the last year and a half. With so many people stuck at home, it's no wonder they decided it might be useful to have an easier way to set timers or listen to music.

The competition in the assistant space is hotter than ever, said Blake Kozak, an analyst at Omdia. Chinese companies like Alibaba and Xiaomi are making big moves in smart speakers, Google's Nest strategy is paying off and even Apple finally made a HomePod that people actually want to buy. Still, Amazon's alone at the top of the heap: It accounted for about 30% of global smart speaker shipments last year, Kozak said, and 57% in the U.S.

When it comes to what people actually do with those devices, though, the list remains concerningly short. Remember when Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone by saying, "It's an iPod, a phone, an internet mobile communicator"? The App Store eventually made the iPhone much more than that. Well, smart speakers are music players, timer setters and weather reporters. And largely still waiting on the next thing.

Within Amazon, the Alexa Fund quickly figured out its strategy: It doesn't typically lead rounds or take huge chunks of companies, instead preferring to be a smaller and more strategic investor. "We leaned into building a team of product and program managers whose sole purpose in life is to support the companies we invest in," Bernard said. Sometimes that's technical support, sometimes it's early access to APIs, sometimes it's just helping those startups get connected to other teams and executives inside of Amazon. When it works, it's a virtuous cycle: Startups tell Amazon what they need, Amazon builds better tools and platforms, those platforms make it easier for other developers to get started, everybody wins.

Matthew Crowley, the CEO of Vesper, which makes durable and high-fidelity microphones, said Amazon is both an investor and a customer, and that it works out pretty well on both sides. "If we say, 'I have a great idea,' or we have this new product, and we think this business group would really benefit from it, they can reach out on our behalf and try to organize a meeting." And, he said, the Fund seems to be "a way for Amazon to get exposed to external ideas." Vesper has bigger and more-involved investors, he said, but having Amazon on board also helps validate the company and its tech. And that helps double when they're trying to sell to a very large company called Amazon.

The Fund deliberately casts a wide net, Bernard said, in part because voice is still in such early stages that it's hard to know who's going to win. It has invested in hardware companies, even ones making products that ostensibly compete with Echos. It invests in the supply chain, like processor-maker Syntiant. It funds companies building skills, companies building other developer tools. Since Alexa is both a product and a toolkit, Amazon has to think about it broadly.

Still, Bernard did offer a hint about his overall thesis: "I think consumer products that have daily habit characteristics just have a higher chance of being successful." Same for Alexa: People learn to do certain things through a conversational assistant, and then they do them over and over again. It can be much harder to make an ambient interface feel habitual, compared to a smartphone that users look at and can buzz in their pocket, but when things stick for voice users, they really stick.

One place where that thinking led was to smart home products. (Nothing's more habitual than turning on lights and brewing coffee, right?) Most people in the virtual assistant space see connected homes as a key driver for virtual assistants, and Amazon has been investing in that idea since the beginning. The Alexa Fund invested in ecobee, Rise Gardens, August and even Ring before it was acquired by Amazon. The goal with all of it, Bernard said, "is to make the home feel like the product … you're interacting with a thermostat, but it feels like you're interacting with the home, right?"

Fitness has been another surprise win both for the Alexa Fund and for Alexa in general, largely thanks to the pandemic. Companies like Zwift, Tonal and Aaptiv all grew fast as a locked-down public needed a new way to exercise, and many people turned to their smart speakers for guidance. In a way, it's a perfect showcase for the tech: "Using an app to navigate your way through an exercise program is really, really suboptimal," Bernard said. Since Amazon had invested in those companies a few years ago, they'd been working on the tooling and interaction models to make fitness work. And so they were ready.

This is where the flywheel comes in again. Much of what Amazon learns through working with startups ends up back in tools like the Alexa Skills Kit and the Alexa Voice Service, where they become self-serve tools for any developer to access. That's ultimately the only way for the ecosystem to scale, and Amazon knows it.

This strategy also helps Amazon win even if it loses. The company's most ambitious plan is to be both the flagship product in the voice industry, and the AWS-style infrastructure for all the others. Through the Custom Assistant feature, companies like Verizon are already building their own tools that don't respond to Alexa but nevertheless use Alexa tech.

Increasingly, it seems that the future of the virtual assistant is veering away from the path set out by the smartphone. In the original metaphor, Amazon imagined Alexa as the iPhone: the one surface on which everything runs. But Alexa and other voice assistants are turning out to be more like Android, or maybe the internet as a whole: malleable platforms that developers can build on top of, with as little or as much customization as they'd like. For a while, it looked like the future involved a lot of sentences beginning with "Alexa" or "OK Google." Going forward, those look more like underlying technologies for a huge variety of applications and devices.

There are now more than 200 devices with Alexa built in, Rubenson said, more than 140,000 smart-home products that work with Alexa, and more than 130,000 skills available for users. That presents Amazon with a new kind of app store problem: discoverability. Amazon is trying lots of ways to help people find new stuff to do — weekly emails, recommendations on devices with screens, even Alexa itself offering ideas — but Rubenson admits it's still a challenge. And until Amazon cracks discovery, getting developers to build new and original capabilities for Alexa might be a tough sell.

So far, voice assistants have been most useful (and most used) in the home. The Alexa app works fine, but Amazon has largely stopped working on efforts to get Alexa integrated more deeply into the mobile experience. Instead the company and the Fund are looking ahead, investing in companies like Mojo Vision, which is working on smart contact lenses. "That was less leaning into our strengths, and more leaning into the things we needed to know for Alexa to be pervasive and not just bound to the home," Bernard said.

Mobility in general — from Alexa in your glasses to Alexa in your car to Alexa on the scooter you pick up on the street — is top of Bernard's mind right now. As the world re-emerges into a post-pandemic reality, after more than a year of time spent at home talking to Alexa and Google Assistant, it's time for the assistants to move into the real world as well. "I think there's a lot of other opportunities," Kozak said, "not necessarily for the smart speakers themselves, but the digital assistants." Assistants are being built into new condo complexes, integrated into jewelry and coming standard in new cars. They're becoming ubiquitous. And for Amazon, the race is on to make sure Alexa is in there somewhere. Even when it's not named Alexa.


Getting reproductive benefits at work could be a privacy nightmare

A growing number of tech companies are extending abortion-related travel benefits. Given privacy and legal fears, will employees be too scared to use them?

How employers can implement and discuss reproductive benefits in a way that puts employees at ease.

Photo: Sigrid Gombert via Getty Images

It’s about to be a lot harder to get an abortion in the United States. For many, it’s already hard. The result is that employers, including large companies, are being called upon to fill the abortion care gap. The likelihood of a Roe v. Wade reversal was the push some needed to extend benefits, with Microsoft and Tesla announcing abortion-related travel reimbursements in recent weeks. But the privacy and legal risks facing people in need of abortions loom large. If people have reason to fear texting friends for abortion resources, will they really want to confide in their company?

An employee doesn’t have “much to worry about” when it comes to health privacy, said employee benefits consultant Jessica Du Bois. “The HR director or whoever's in charge of the benefits program is not going to be sharing that information.” Employers have a duty to protect employee health data under HIPAA and a variety of state laws. Companies with self-funded health plans — in other words, most large companies — can see every prescription and service an employee receives. But the data is deidentified.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram: Edge computing is growing faster than the cloud

The now-standalone company is staking its immediate future on the multicloud era of IT and hybrid work, while anticipating increased demand for edge-computing software.

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram spoke with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: VMware

Nearly a year into his tenure as CEO, Raghu Raghuram believes VMware is well-positioned for the third phase of its evolution, but acknowledges its product transformation still needs some work.

The company, which pioneered the hypervisor and expanded to virtualized networking and storage with its vSphere operating environment, now is helping customers navigate a distributed, multicloud world and hybrid work with newfound freedom as an independent company after being spun off from Dell Technologies last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


What’s wrong with current Big Tech HBCU partnerships?

Big Tech is still trying to crack the code on hiring more Black workers despite years of partnerships with HBCUs.

Pictured is the first cohort in Accenture's Level Up program.

Photo: Accenture

As a business major at Prairie View A&M University in Prairie View, Texas, Sean Johnson had been on track to work in finance after graduating. But then his adviser mentioned a program that the historically Black university had with Accenture and Microsoft that was meant to function as a direct pipeline from Prairie View into roles in tech. It changed his entire career course.

Johnson had always had an interest in tech, and the prospect of being able to get a glimpse into the industry, as well as gain real, hands-on experience, appealed to him. By the end of the program, he had a full-time job offer at Accenture.

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.


We’ll be here again: How tech companies fail to prevent terrorism

Social media platforms are playing defense to stop mass shootings. Without cooperation and legislation, it’s not working.

The Buffalo attack showed that tech’s best defenses against online hate aren’t sophisticated enough to fight the algorithms designed by those same companies to promote content.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Tech platforms' patchwork approach to content moderation has made them a hotbed for hate speech that can turn deadly, as it did this weekend in Buffalo. The alleged shooter that killed 10 in a historically Black neighborhood used Discord to plan his rampage for months and livestreamed it on Twitch.

The move mirrors what happened in Christchurch, New Zealand, when a white supremacist murdered 51 people in a mosque in 2019. He viewed the killings as a meme. To disseminate that meme, he turned to the same place more than 1 billion other users do: Facebook. This pattern is destined to repeat itself as long as tech companies continue to play defense instead of offense against online hate and fail to work together.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Latest Stories