Digging in the dust of AOL and Yahoo's lost internet empires

They were once worth nearly half a trillion dollars. Now they're stuck in a losing game of hedge fund hot potato.

​A worker carts away a piece of a Yahoo billboard in San Francisco in 2011.

A worker carts away a piece of a Yahoo billboard in San Francisco in 2011.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Where did half a trillion dollars go? AOL and Yahoo have been sold once again: This time private equity firm Apollo Global Management is buying them from Verizon for $5 billion. It's a paltry sum for a pair of companies that were once valued at more than $475 billion combined.

The story of how a series of inept managers made strategic missteps and wasted opportunity after opportunity has been told in pieces over the years, as the two one-time internet empires retrenched and diminished. But it is still staggering to contemplate that the remaining entity, now simply called Yahoo, has surrendered nearly 99% of its value over the course of two decades.

It's a cautionary tale that shapes the thinking of major internet companies to this day: The urge to stake out territory and match rivals' features and products is still here, but there is more rigor around shutting down ventures that aren't finding an audience. No one wants to replicate the hubristic sprawl of the dot-com boom's web portals.

A pair of founders at a Mountain View company put it simply: "Google does not do horoscopes, financial advice or chat."

Yahoo and AOL did. And much, much more.

To understand how big Yahoo once was — why the internet company was once worth more than $125 billion — it helps to know the company that made its name cataloging the web had its own page dedicated to tracking all of its own websites. It would eventually be called Yahoo Everything.

The Internet Archive didn't capture what Yahoo's homepage looked like on Jan. 3, 2000, the day its shares peaked at $118.75. But records from around that time show a sprawling digital empire: You could log on to Yahoo Bill Pay, where you might pay your Yahoo Visa bill, after shopping on the Macy's Yahoo Store. You might listen to Yahoo Radio while playing on Yahoo Games. Or if you were trying to get work done, you might check your Yahoo Mail, since access to corporate mail outside the firewall was still difficult; download files from Yahoo Briefcase (Dropbox wouldn't exist for another 7 years); read news on Yahoo Finance; and see if colleagues were online via Yahoo Messenger.

A week after Yahoo's value peaked, AOL said it would acquire media company Time Warner in a deal that valued the combined operation at $350 billion. One reason Time Warner was eager to sell was the fear that an internet company like Yahoo might launch a takeover.

Freshly enlarged by acquisitions of digital companies like MapQuest and Moviefone, AOL now had assets like cable systems, networks and movie studios. It even got Warner Music's CD and DVD manufacturing plants, handy for churning out more subscription discs. It had AIM, the instant-messaging system that helped inspire a generation of social networks.

Remember those AOL CDs? Remember those AOL CDs?Photo: Julia Thurston Photography/Getty Images

But far from being a triumph of corporate synergy, the AOL-Time Warner deal was a well-documented disaster. The Time Warner divisions refused to bow to their new overlords from Virginia, and in 2003, the company's board dropped AOL from its name.

Yahoo had its own woes. By 2006, a company executive wrote a memo called "The Peanut Butter Manifesto," saying Yahoo was spreading itself too thin over too many products and missing opportunities to double down on what was working. At the dawn of the social media age, the company bought a host of Web 2.0 startups such as Flickr, Upcoming and Delicious — but it botched a chance to buy Facebook, the one deal that turned out to really matter.

AOL rotted away within Time Warner, its dial-up customer base dwindling as users switched to broadband. The AOL brand was spun off in 2009, then worth around $3 billion, and its independence came to a second end in 2015, when Verizon bought it for $4.4 billion.

Yahoo, meanwhile, had a short-lived renaissance under CEO Marissa Mayer, a former Google executive. At first, she applied Google-y rigor to Yahoo's lineup of properties, shutting down a number of projects that were going nowhere fast. But she also furiously acquired startups, most famously spending $1.1 billion on Tumblr in 2013.

By 2017, activist investors were circling and Mayer stepped down. Verizon bought Yahoo and merged it with AOL, a combination investors and bankers had been talking about for years. Then-CEO Tim Armstrong even had a name for it: Oath. That name had an even shorter run than AOL Time Warner.

Over the past two decades, AOL and Yahoo have left a trail of discarded brand names, products and hopes. Some were sold off, like HuffPost, Tumblr and MapQuest; others were shuttered. Netscape, the once-famous internet browser whose purchase beefed up AOL's web presence, still exists as a necromantic portal. Yahoo still has an Everything page, which is … something.

But the dream of the web portal, a place to start your internet journey and stay for more, the notion that a brand like "Yahoo" or "AOL" could be slapped on just about any topic and turned into a gold mine of advertising, is long gone. The closest analogy is Mark Zuckerberg's widely derided relabeling of Instagram and WhatsApp as being "from Facebook." With Big Tech's reputation growing ever more toxic, discretion seems the better part of branding.

Yahoo's new owners are bullish about what they've just purchased, pointing to the 900 million monthly active users still visiting AOL and Yahoo websites. Apollo's Reed Rayman said his firm would "unlock the tremendous potential of Yahoo and its unparalleled collection of brands."

That may be exactly what weighs most heavily on the new venture: its history of launching and acquiring brands, spreading itself thin like peanut butter over slice after slice of the internet rather than letting its ideas bake.

"Do you, uh, Yahoo?" the company asked in a 1998 ad. If Apollo can figure out an answer that escaped CEO after CEO for the past two decades, it might have some hope of restoring those lost billions.

Policy

How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories
Bulletins