Apple Epic Trial

Tim Cook argues only Apple can protect iOS users from themselves

"When they buy an iPhone today, they buy something that just works."

Tim Cook argues only Apple can protect iOS users from themselves

Tim Cook was adamant in his insistence that Apple stands alone in its ability to protect smartphone owners from a world of threats that includes their own bad judgement.

Photo: Nina Riggio/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Apple CEO Tim Cook took the stand on Friday for the final day of testimony in the Epic v. Apple antitrust trial. It was Cook's first time testifying in court, though he was well prepared to argue Apple's point of view around the dangers of opening up the iOS ecosystem and why Apple operates its business the way it does.

While Cook largely reiterated many of the same arguments fellow executives Phil Schiller and Craig Federighi made earlier this week, he was more adamant in his insistence that Apple stands alone in its ability to protect smartphone owners from a world of threats that includes their own bad judgement.

"I think we care more than others do … I think there's some people that really want that, and therefore buy an iPhone because of it," Cook argued in front of Epic lawyer Gary Bornstein, who questioned whether Apple was "unique" in its ability to protect its users and whether it was true Apple "had a monopoly on privacy."

"When they buy an iPhone today, they buy something that just works. I think they buy into a total ecosystem when they buy an iPhone," Cook said. Bornstein presented Cook with the notion that Apple has no idea if it's more dangerous to open up the iOS ecosystem because it has not once allowed it in the iPhone's nearly 15 years of existence. "It's an experiment I wouldn't want to run," Cook replied. Cook said his assertion that a more open IOS would be "terrible for the user" to be based on his "business judgment."

Cook's comments echo those of Federighi, who surprised the courtroom and longtime Apple observers on Wednesday when he testified that the macOS operating system had a level of malware that was "not acceptable," effectively implying the Mac is unsafe when compared to the level of security enjoyed by iPhone owners. That's because on the Mac, users are allowed to download software from unauthorized third-party sources on the internet.

The goal of Federighi's testimony was to ensure Epic's legal team could not argue the iPhone be opened up just like the Mac, which has an Apple-operated App Store but allows users the freedom to download unvetted software of their choosing. Federighi used a car metaphor, saying that cars are designed to be more capable but that the freedom of a car also makes them dangerous if driven recklessly. "If operated correctly, much like that car, if you know how to operate a car and obey the rules of the road and are very cautious, yes," Federighi said when asked whether the macOS platform is safe. "If not, I've had a couple of family members who have gotten some malware on their Macs."

Crypto crackdowns and fintech super apps

Plus, the Coinbase/Robinhood competition heats up.

Photo: Dmitry Demidko /Unsplash

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Ben Pimentel joins the show to discuss China's aggressive moves against the crypto industry, Robinhood and Coinbase's battle for crypto supremacy, and PayPal's new financial super app. Then Tomio Geron explains what's going on at Binance, and why the largest crypto exchange in the world is under so much regulatory scrutiny.

For more on the topics discussed in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editor at large. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.

Theranos 'valued PR' over patients, an ex-employee says

Adam Rosendorff said he felt pressured to vouch for tests he did not have confidence in. His testimony appeared to tie Holmes more closely to the lab's failures.

Elizabeth Holmes leaves the San Jose courthouse where her fraud trial is underway.

Photo: Jane Tyska/Digital First Media/The Mercury News via Getty Images

Former Theranos lab director Adam Rosendorff testified Friday that he repeatedly raised the alarm about bad blood tests to then-CEO Elizabeth Holmes, ultimately concluding that the company valued press and funding more than the patients.

"I was very enthusiastic working at Theranos in the beginning. Over time, I came to realize that the company really valued PR and fundraising above patient care, and I became very disillusioned," Rosendorff said on the witness stand inside the San Jose courtroom where Holmes' trial on fraud charges began this month.

Keep Reading Show less
Biz Carson

Biz Carson ( @bizcarson) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering Silicon Valley with a focus on startups and venture capital. Previously, she reported for Forbes and was co-editor of Forbes Next Billion-Dollar Startups list. Before that, she worked for Business Insider, Gigaom, and Wired and started her career as a newspaper designer for Gannett.

Protocol | China

Can NFTs happen in a crypto-less China? Amazingly, yes.

Using clever workarounds, Chinese NFT players are managing to weather a regulatory ban on cryptocurrency.

No matter what workarounds Chinese NFT marketplaces choose, the result is that most NFT transactions in China feel detached from cryptocurrency.

Image: Yu Chun Christopher Wong/S3studio/Getty Images

The NFT craze has come to China, but you can hardly see any trace of crypto in it.

In the past two months, Chinese social media and gaming giant Tencent has built an NFT purchase and collection app, ecommerce platform Alibaba sold 50 NFT mooncakes in a stunt to promote a metaverse product and half a dozen startups are competing to be the winner of the localized non-fungible token trading market in China.

Keep Reading Show less
Zeyi Yang
Zeyi Yang is a reporter with Protocol | China. Previously, he worked as a reporting fellow for the digital magazine Rest of World, covering the intersection of technology and culture in China and neighboring countries. He has also contributed to the South China Morning Post, Nikkei Asia, Columbia Journalism Review, among other publications. In his spare time, Zeyi co-founded a Mandarin podcast that tells LGBTQ stories in China. He has been playing Pokemon for 14 years and has a weird favorite pick.
Protocol | China

A Chinese ‘game companion’ platform’s phantom shutdown

Bixin said it would shutter its game companion business to keep regulators happy. It looks a lot like business as usual.

China's game companions are becoming even more vulnerable as a result of regulatory scrutiny.

Photo: Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images

In a clear response to regulatory scrutiny, Bixin, China's leading online marketplace for game companions, or peiwan, announced on Sept. 10 that it would "permanently shutter" its controversial peiwan business. But its internal announcement shared with Protocol seems to contradict its public declarations.

This past summer, Chinese authorities issued a slew of regulations aimed at addressing what Beijing considers toxic subcultures and practices that harm the country's minors. Bixin, an app developed by Shanghai Yitan Network Technology Company with 6 million registered game companions, also received its own share of regulatory pressure. Yitan was founded in 2014 and is backed by IDG Capital.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at

Latest Stories