The most popular — and most canceled — subscriptions will surprise you

The best subscriptions are ones that offer more value than they cost, even if people don’t hold onto them forever.

Illustration with logos of subscription services

The subscriptions people actually keep are ones that offer the most bang for their buck.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Click banner image for more Subscription Week 2022 coverage

Shampoo, toothpaste, signed autographs, toilet paper, letters from dead people and weed have more in common than you think. You can get them delivered to your front door (or phone) every month for a subscription fee. But only some of them are actually useful.

The subscriptions people actually keep are ones that offer the most bang for their buck on a regular basis — otherwise, why keep paying? Yahya Mokhtarzada, chief revenue officer of subscription management company Truebill, said his own subscriptions range from weird (socks) to useful (razors), but what they have in common is their value to him.

“It's a little bit embarrassing to admit, but I watch Netflix probably at least every other day,” Mokhtarzada told Protocol. “It’s not only about how often you use [subscriptions], it's more so how often it gives you value.”

Truebill ran the numbers on the subscriptions that people cancel the most, the ones they keep and the weirdest subscriptions you’ve never heard of. Let’s dive in.

The subscriptions people cancel

Subscriptions for Audible, Time, Amazon Kindle, The New York Times and BeenVerified — in that order — have the highest cancellation rates, Truebill found based on the percentage of users who have a subscription and canceled last month. All of those subscriptions have cancellation rates above 15%, with Audible’s rate sitting about 18% (that’s nearly $15 per month for audiobooks you can get at a free public library, by the way).

Mokhtarzada said high cancellation rates aren’t always the sign of a bad product. Audible, for instance, has a massive user base. As of 2020, Audible Plus had about 300 million monthly active users.

“That's actually a positive reflection of just how good Amazon has done at spreading the word,” he said. “You want people to try it, experience it and then decide if it's for them or not.”

Audible aside, Mokhtarzada said subscriptions with higher cancellation rates tend to fall in two buckets. People may have signed up for an “aspirational” subscription, which might involve a gym or audiobook membership, with the hope that they’d finally find time to listen to books or work out at the gym. He said sign-ups for these subscriptions spike around New Year’s, and cancellations for them rise around March.

“People sign up to the subscription, almost hoping that it gets them into the habit or forces the habit on them,” he said. “And then when that falls through, they end up canceling it.”

On the other hand, people may have caught themselves in what Mokhtarzada calls a “sneaky” subscription, which might involve a fashion subscription or in-flight Wi-Fi. “It’s not all of them, but there are some bad actors there,” Mokhtarzada said.

The subscriptions people keep

The least-canceled subscriptions include productivity services like Wix, Squarespace, Dropbox and Zoom; streaming and entertainment services like Twitch, Xbox Game Pass and Blizzard Entertainment; and financial subscriptions like Stash and Wealthfront, Truebill found. All of those services have cancellation rates of 1% to 2%.

Although Netflix doesn’t have the highest retention rate, Mokhtarzada pointed to the streaming platform as a “gold standard” in terms of retention because it’s both easy to sign up for and cancel. He said lots of companies try to grow their businesses by sneaking people in or making the cancellation process a headache, but Netflix does the opposite. Customers can cancel or pause their subscription at any point, and its retention rate sits around 4%.

“And the way they grow their business is just by providing a great product, and their product is so good that you feel like you're missing out if you don't have it,” he said.

Amazon Prime is another example of a subscription that sticks. It offers so many benefits that they start to outweigh the cost of the subscription itself. “They're constantly adding new perks and benefits to it that just make it a no-brainer to have,” he said.

The weirdest subscriptions you can buy

Here’s the moment you’ve all been waiting for: The subscriptions you didn’t know people have (or need).

Unfortunately, it’s not all laughs. Mokhtarzada said the amount of money people spend on credit repair and identity protection services is “shockingly high,” and the products themselves are relatively expensive. Ironic, isn’t it? The monthly cost for’s most basic package, for instance, is almost $70.

“It's unfortunate, because if you're talking about credit repair, we’re generally speaking of the people that are most stretched financially,” he said. “It's just a bummer.”

Sorry for that depressing bit of data. But on a lighter note, Truebill’s data also shows that there are a never-ending number of “subscription boxes” out there. There’s a box for just about everything, from a Japanese food subscription service to niche dating (just discovered there’s a service specifically for music lovers, if that’s your thing).

Mokhtarzada said he likes popular boxes like The Farmer’s Dog for pet food, sock boxes (did you know there’s a sock-of-the-month Club?!) and Imperfect Foods, which delivers a weekly staple of fruits and vegetables that would otherwise be thrown away.

People may not hold onto their box subscriptions for long, and Mokhtarzada said that’s OK. It would be considered a win for you to drop your dating subscription, because it may mean you’ve found what you’re looking for. And how long do you really need a monthly toothpaste supply before your bathroom cabinets are filled with tubes? Mokhtarzada said a subscription works if people find value in it for a period of time and don’t feel conned into subscribing.

“You can either make a one-time purchase or sign up as a subscription, and that works,” Mokhtarzada said. “But what’s not good for people is when you go in for a one-time purchase, and the language isn't super clear that you are ending up into a recurring billing subscription.”


To clear the FTC, Microsoft’s Activision deal might require compromise

The FTC is in the process of reviewing the biggest-ever gaming acquisition. Here’s how it could change the Xbox business.

Will the Microsoft acquisition of Activision get through the FTC?

Image: Microsoft; Protocol

Microsoft’s planned acquisition of Activision Blizzard is the largest-ever deal in the video game market by a mile. With a sale price of $68.7 billion, the deal is nearly 450% larger than Grand Theft Auto publisher Take-Two Interactive’s acquisition of Zynga in January, the next-largest game acquisition ever recorded.

The eye-popping price underlines the scale and scope of Microsoft’s ambitions for its gaming business: If the deal is approved, Microsoft would own — alongside its current major properties, such as Halo and Minecraft — Warcraft, Overwatch and Call of Duty, to name just a few. In turn, the deal has invited a rare level of scrutiny and attention from lawmakers and policy professionals now turning their sights on an industry that’s flown under the regulatory radar for the last several decades of its existence.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


Okta CEO: 'We should have done a better job' with the Lapsus$ breach

In an interview with Protocol, Okta CEO Todd McKinnon said the cybersecurity firm could’ve done a lot of things better after the Lapsus$ breach of a third-party support provider earlier this year.

From talking to hundreds of customers, “I've had a good sense of the sentiment and the frustrations,” McKinnon said.

Photo: David Paul Morris via Getty Images

Okta co-founder and CEO Todd McKinnon agrees with you: Disclosing a breach that impacts customer data should not take months.

“If that happens in January, customers can't be finding out about it in March,” McKinnon said in an interview with Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Ethereum's co-founder thinks the blockchain can fix social media

But before the blockchain can fix social media, someone has to fix the blockchain. Frank McCourt, who’s put serious money behind his vision of a decentralized social media future, thinks Gavin Wood may be the key.

Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum and creator of Polkadot, is helping Frank McCourt's decentralized social media initiative.

Photo: Jason Crowley

Frank McCourt, the billionaire mogul who is donating $100 million to help build decentralized alternatives to the social media giants, has picked a partner to make the blockchain work at Facebook scale: Ethereum co-founder Gavin Wood.

McCourt’s Project Liberty will work with the Web3 Foundation’s Polkadot project, it said Tuesday. Wood launched Polkadot in 2020 after leaving Ethereum. Project Liberty has a technical proposal to allow users to retain their data on a blockchain as they move among future social media services. Wood’s involvement is to give the idea a shot at actually working at the size and speed of a popular social network.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories