yesBradley TuskNone

Get access to Protocol

Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber

Why Joe Biden might kill the DOJ's case against Google

Google has the resources to pressure a new administration to change course — and Trump has given Biden an excuse to do just that.

Why Joe Biden might kill the DOJ's case against Google

If Biden wins in November, the DOJ could have an uphill battle convincing the administration to follow through on the federal antitrust suit.

Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

There's an old adage in the political world: Don't pick battles with people who buy ink by the barrel. Imagine what it'd take to apply that saying to the United States Department of Justice: Don't pick fights with people who file prosecutions by the millions? There's no legal entity in the world with more resources, sophistication, talent and power than the Justice Department. And yet, in its coming antitrust battle with Google, DOJ may meet its match.

Google is valued at a little over $1 trillion. The federal antitrust suit alleges that Google's control of search is monopolistic and cannot continue. That's an existential threat to Google's future, meaning there's literally no amount of money Google shouldn't spend to win in court and to make its case in public. That doesn't just mean tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars budgeted for the legal fight. It could mean billions or even tens of billions of dollars.

At the same time, the Justice Department has suffered a major talent drain since the Trump administration began dismantling the checks and balances that usually separate the political needs of the White House from the daily to-do list of the attorney general. If the current polls hold, Joe Biden is likely to win in November and present a new attorney general for Senate confirmation in January. While dropping a federal lawsuit just because of regime change isn't normal, in this case, team Biden could easily say "Trump and Barr pushed this through for political purposes, just like they did with everything else. Prosecuting Google may absolutely be the right thing to do, but we'll determine that on the merits and the facts, not on the politics. Stand by."

At the very least, that means that the current antitrust team at DOJ working on the case will have to convince their new bosses that this single prosecution, against a foe essentially just as rich and well-resourced as they are, is worth the political cost. What happens if Google starts running negative advertising against Biden across the country? What if they go after House and Senate Democrats? How many points do they have to take off of an incumbent's approval rating before the White House is flooded with calls from anxious politicians who want the advertising onslaught to stop, regardless of what it means for antitrust policy?

It's clear that the Justice Department has been concerned about monopolistic behavior by Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple for a long time. And it's clear that DOJ has studied the case against each tech giant carefully. But whether the choice to target Google is based on the highest odds of success, the greatest good for innovation and competition, or if it represents the political agenda of an extremely paranoid president and attorney general is unclear at best. And if Google flexes its muscles enough, it may be able to convince the incoming administration to first figure out exactly why Trump and Barr chose Google before pursuing litigation that will consume the agency for years to come.

Maybe upon further examination, it's clear that Google is the right antitrust target and the case proceeds as planned. Or maybe it's clear instead that having Google as a mortal enemy isn't worth the cost, especially when you can pin the blame on the previous administration. Or maybe Biden's supporters like Elizabeth Warren on the far left who favor antitrust prosecutions, new privacy regulations, peeling back the protections of Section 230 and more prefer taking on Facebook instead (especially after Mark Zuckerberg's long courting of Jared Kushner).

The case against Google may be winnable. It may be the right thing to do. But coming at the very end of a term from the most controversial administration ever means that Team Biden has the excuse to set the case aside, if they so choose. And it means that this fight not only is far from over, it may never even get started.

Protocol | Fintech

Plaid’s COO is riding fintech’s choppy waves

He's a striking presence on the beach. If he navigates Plaid's data challenges, Eric Sager will loom large in the financial world as well.

Plaid COO Eric Sager is an avid surfer.

Photo: Plaid

Eric Sager is an avid surfer. It's a fitting passion for the No. 2 executive at Plaid, a startup that's riding fintech's rough waters — including a rogue wave on the horizon that could cause a wipeout.

As Plaid's chief operating officer, Sager has been helping the startup navigate that choppiness, from an abandoned merger with Visa to a harsh critique by the CEO of a top Wall Street bank.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Sponsored Content

The future of computing at the edge: an interview with Intel’s Tom Lantzsch

An interview with Tom Lantzsch, SVP and GM, Internet of Things Group at Intel

An interview with Tom Lantzsch

Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Internet of Things Group (IoT) at Intel Corporation

Edge computing had been on the rise in the last 18 months – and accelerated amid the need for new applications to solve challenges created by the Covid-19 pandemic. Tom Lantzsch, Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Internet of Things Group (IoT) at Intel Corp., thinks there are more innovations to come – and wants technology leaders to think equally about data and the algorithms as critical differentiators.

In his role at Intel, Lantzsch leads the worldwide group of solutions architects across IoT market segments, including retail, banking, hospitality, education, industrial, transportation, smart cities and healthcare. And he's seen first-hand how artificial intelligence run at the edge can have a big impact on customers' success.

Protocol sat down with Lantzsch to talk about the challenges faced by companies seeking to move from the cloud to the edge; some of the surprising ways that Intel has found to help customers and the next big breakthrough in this space.

What are the biggest trends you are seeing with edge computing and IoT?

A few years ago, there was a notion that the edge was going to be a simplistic model, where we were going to have everything connected up into the cloud and all the compute was going to happen in the cloud. At Intel, we had a bit of a contrarian view. We thought much of the interesting compute was going to happen closer to where data was created. And we believed, at that time, that camera technology was going to be the driving force – that just the sheer amount of content that was created would be overwhelming to ship to the cloud – so we'd have to do compute at the edge. A few years later – that hypothesis is in action and we're seeing edge compute happen in a big way.

Keep Reading Show less
Saul Hudson
Saul Hudson has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, especially in understanding and targeting messages in cutting-edge technologies. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, in helping companies to build passionate audiences and accelerate their growth. Hudson has reported from more than 30 countries, from war zones to boardrooms to presidential palaces. He has led multinational, multi-lingual teams and managed operations for hundreds of journalists. Hudson is a Managing Partner at Angle42, a strategic communications consultancy.

Don't sacrifice security for performance when computing at the edge

Companies must look at security in tandem with networking.

Federal IT managers and security analysts need to weigh the risk and reward of each upgrade or improvement to minimize new risk, writes Jim Richberg.

Image: Florian Olivo/Unsplash

Jim Richberg is the Public Sector Field CISO at Fortinet.

As federal agencies increasingly push for improved performance and agility through their networks and devices, they must also consider the lack of visibility that comes with deploying cutting-edge technology. Centralized visibility and unified controls are sometimes being sacrificed in favor of performance and agility through smart devices collecting and processing data at the edge.

Keep Reading Show less
Transforming 2021

Blockchain, QR codes and your phone: the race to build vaccine passports

Digital verification systems could give people the freedom to work and travel. Here's how they could actually happen.

One day, you might not need to carry that physical passport around, either.

Photo: CommonPass

There will come a time, hopefully in the near future, when you'll feel comfortable getting on a plane again. You might even stop at the lounge at the airport, head to the regional office when you land and maybe even see a concert that evening. This seemingly distant reality will depend upon vaccine rollouts continuing on schedule, an open-sourced digital verification system and, amazingly, the blockchain.

Several countries around the world have begun to prepare for what comes after vaccinations. Swaths of the population will be vaccinated before others, but that hasn't stopped industries decimated by the pandemic from pioneering ways to get some people back to work and play. One of the most promising efforts is the idea of a "vaccine passport," which would allow individuals to show proof that they've been vaccinated against COVID-19 in a way that could be verified by businesses to allow them to travel, work or relax in public without a great fear of spreading the virus.

Keep Reading Show less
Mike Murphy

Mike Murphy ( @mcwm) is the director of special projects at Protocol, focusing on the industries being rapidly upended by technology and the companies disrupting incumbents. Previously, Mike was the technology editor at Quartz, where he frequently wrote on robotics, artificial intelligence, and consumer electronics.


Google wants to help you get a life

Digital car windows, curved AR glasses, automatic presentations and other patents from Big Tech.

A new patent from Google offers a few suggestions.

Image: USPTO

Another week has come to pass, meaning it's time again for Big Tech patents! You've hopefully been busy reading all the new Manual Series stories that have come out this week and are now looking forward to hearing what comes after what comes next. Google wants to get rid of your double-chin selfie videos and find things for you as you sit bored at home; Apple wants to bring translucent displays to car windows; and Microsoft is exploring how much you can stress out a virtual assistant.

And remember: The big tech companies file all kinds of crazy patents for things, and though most never amount to anything, some end up defining the future.

Keep Reading Show less
Mike Murphy

Mike Murphy ( @mcwm) is the director of special projects at Protocol, focusing on the industries being rapidly upended by technology and the companies disrupting incumbents. Previously, Mike was the technology editor at Quartz, where he frequently wrote on robotics, artificial intelligence, and consumer electronics.

Latest Stories