"Today's social and political waters are especially choppy," Fried wrote in a blog post. "Sensitivities are at 11, and every discussion remotely related to politics, advocacy, or society at large quickly spins away from pleasant. You shouldn't have to wonder if staying out of it means you're complicit, or wading into it means you're a target. These are difficult enough waters to navigate in life, but significantly more so at work. It's become too much. It's a major distraction. It saps our energy, and redirects our dialog towards dark places. It's not healthy, it hasn't served us well. And we're done with it at Basecamp."
In his post, Fried makes it clear that Basecamp is not a social impact company. In Fried's opinion, Basecamp does not need to solve social problems or "chime in publicly whenever the world requests our opinion on the major issues of the day, or get behind one movement or another with time or treasure."
Beyond banning political and social conversations, Basecamp is also getting rid of certain employee benefits, committees, and 360 performance reviews.
On the benefits front, employees will no longer be able to access fitness benefits, a wellness allowance, a farmer's market share or support for continuing education. Fried refers to those as "paternalistic benefits," and said it's none of Basecamp's business what employees do outside of work.
"By providing funds for certain things, we're getting too deep into nudging people's personal, individual choices," he said.
Basecamp, however, said it has already paid out every employee the full cash value of those benefits for this year. Additionally, the company will instead pay employees a 10% profit-share.
Fried did not mention any sort of an exit package, but recognized some employees may not be on board with the changes. Likening the company changes to product changes, Fried said that just how some changes are dealbreakers for customers, some changes may be dealbreakers for employees.
"And when you get to a certain count — customers or employees or both — there's no pleasing everyone," he wrote. "You can't — there are too many unique perspectives, experiences, and individuals."