Bulletins

FTC vs. Facebook is back on, and it's going deep on mobile stumbles

One of the first major tests for Lina Khan's commission comes in response to a judge's ruling that the FTC's first complaint did too little to measure Facebook's market share.

FTC building exterior

The FTC refiled its complaint against Facebook.

Photo: bpperry/Getty Images

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Thursday took another stab at its massive antitrust lawsuit against Facebook as it filed an amended complaint seeking the company's breakup, following a judge's June dismissal of the government's first attempt.


The FTC filed its original complaint last December, in which it focused on Facebook's allegedly anticompetitive acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Although industry watchers considered the suit to be aggressive, District Judge James Boasberg in a June decision said the FTC had not done enough to measure Facebook's market share. Boasberg also raised questions about how the commission even defined the company's market — a key first step in many competition cases. Boasberg, however, left the commission the opportunity to refile with a complaint that addressed his concerns.

The new filing is an early test for an FTC that has turned dramatically toward tech skepticism with the change in administration. The commission's new 3–2 Democratic majority is led by chair Lina Khan, who helped build a movement advocating for reforming and increasing antitrust enforcement, in part to take on Big Tech.

In the renewed complaint, which runs more than 25 pages longer than the original, the FTC included more details about which other companies, such as Snapchat, it believes are in the same market as Facebook, and how their user bases and the amount of time users spend on their sites compare. The agency cites use information from sources such as Comscore in some cases, and extends its scope even to consider older Facebook competitors such as Google+ and MySpace. The FTC meanwhile said some social services, such as Reddit and TikTok, are not part of the same market segment as Facebook because they don't focus on personal connections from outside the platform — like family and friends.

The amended complaint also includes figures on issues like smartphone adoption rates. Worries about the performance of the original Facebook site and app on mobile phones, for instance, made the company particularly concerned about competitors, including Instagram and WhatsApp, that were native to smartphones and performed well on the go, the FTC contends.

"After failing to compete with new innovators, Facebook illegally bought or buried them when their popularity became an existential threat," Holly Vedova, the acting director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, said in a statement. Vedova said Facebook's action's "degraded the social network experience, subjecting users to lower levels of privacy and data protections and more intrusive ads."

The commission previously approved both Facebook's 2012 Instagram acquisition and its 2014 WhatsApp acquisition, but the complaint includes numerous instances of Facebook leadership, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, positioning the company for those deals explicitly because of concerns they could pose a threat.

Facebook hits back

"The company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp have made the digital landscape less competitive, ultimately harming consumers," Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who chairs a subcommittee on competition law, said in a statement. "Big technology companies like Facebook should not have free [rein] to impose their will on the market, and they must be held accountable when they attempt to do so."

John Newman, an antitrust scholar at the University of Miami School of Law, tweeted that "the relevant market participants appear to be more clearly identified" in the new complaint. Supporters of increased antitrust enforcement also celebrated the refiling, with an official from the consumer group Public Citizen approvingly calling Khan "a new sheriff in town."

Facebook has contended the deals for Instagram and WhatsApp were positive for consumers, as they have created functions users enjoy, and that the apps' success is the result of Facebook's investments rather than a sign that the services would have been formidable competitors if left on their own.

Christine Wilson, a Republican commissioner who voted against issuing both the original and the renewed complaint, said in a statement that the new charges could "undermine the integrity of the premerger notification process" Facebook used to alert the government to the purchases of Instagram and WhatsApp. NetChoice, a trade group that counts Facebook as a member, said the FTC was "refusing to accept the existence of vibrant competition in the social media market."

The new filing comes from an FTC that looks dramatically different than it did when the lawsuit first landed in 2020. In addition to the Democratic majority, Khan has made internal changes that could make it easier for the FTC to go after a broader array of potentially anticompetitive conduct.

Facebook has specifically argued that Khan's record in academia, think tanks and Congress means that she should recuse herself from the matter, claiming she has pre-judged the company's case.

In a statement alongside the filing, the FTC said its Office of General Counsel "carefully reviewed Facebook's petition to recuse" and that the commission's lawyers concluded the judge would provide "the appropriate constitutional due process protections" to Facebook. The FTC dismissed the petition.

During her confirmation process, Khan had said she didn't have the financial conflicts that generally prompt recusals, and defenders have argued her expertise shows she should be in charge of the case rather than made to step away from it.

Court troubles

The FTC has had a chance to refile in this instance, but courts in recent months have handed the FTC several other losses. In April, for example, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the commission had overstated its authority to quickly secure money for consumers, including victims of fraud.

The FTC had actually invoked the same provision, under which the commission claims a variety of powers, in its original Facebook complaint. The first filing also alleged Facebook maintained exclusionary policies toward rivals. Facebook invoked the agency's Supreme Court loss in its petition to have the case dismissed.

Boasberg said in his dismissal that the FTC had erred in trying to challenge Facebook's platform rules under that provision, but added the agency could proceed in challenging the acquisitions. The FTC in its second filing repeated some of the charges against Facebook's platform rules, alleging that its conduct is not in the past but is instead ongoing.

More than 45 states also filed suit against Facebook concurrently with the FTC in 2020. Boasberg in June dismissed the states' complaint, which featured similar allegations to the federal suit. The states are appealing the move.

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,Checkout.com

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at Checkout.com. He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Protocol | Enterprise

How GitHub COO Erica Brescia runs the coding gold mines

GitHub sits at the center of the world's software-development activity, which makes the Microsoft-owned code repository a major target for hackers and a trend-setter in open source software.

GitHub COO Erica Brescia

Photo: GitHub

An astonishing amount of the code that runs the world's software spends at least part of its life in GitHub. COO Erica Brescia is responsible for making sure that's not a disaster in the making.

Brescia joined GitHub after selling Bitnami, the open-source software deployment tool she co-founded, to VMware in 2019. She's responsible for all operational aspects of GitHub, which was acquired by Microsoft in 2018 for $7.5 billion in one of its largest deals to date.

Keep Reading Show less
Tom Krazit

Tom Krazit ( @tomkrazit) is Protocol's enterprise editor, covering cloud computing and enterprise technology out of the Pacific Northwest. He has written and edited stories about the technology industry for almost two decades for publications such as IDG, CNET, paidContent, and GeekWire, and served as executive editor of Gigaom and Structure.

Latest Stories