Workplace

These 11 tech execs’ pandemic security cost over $46 million

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's security costs alone accounted for half of the titans' total at more than $23 million. Costs rose even as CEOs shifted to home offices.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg leaves the Merrion Hotel in Dublin after a 2019 meeting with politicians. His security costs that year topped $20 million.

Photo: Niall Carson/PA Images via Getty Images

Corporate security programs are used to dealing with a litany of threats from kidnapping to cyberattacks, but 2020 had a new kind of peril: a pandemic. Stay-at-home orders may have cut down on travel expenses, but a Protocol analysis of executive security costs in the tech industry shows that companies like Facebook, Google and Apple all ended up paying more for personal security in 2020 due to the pandemic than in previous years.

"It is 100% my belief that part of our protection is protecting the health of our clients," said World Protection Group's Kent Moyer, who manages security for high net-worth individuals and tech clients. He said his clients faced an increased number of threats in 2020, and believed the pandemic and self-isolation played a role in their rise. "If someone was a little bit wacky, they became a lot wacky," he said.

Facebook said it spent more to protect its executives as a result of new COVID-19 security protocols and for increased security during the election. CEO Mark Zuckerberg's security budget swelled from $20.4 million in 2019 to $23.4 million in 2020, the largest amount spent among major tech executives, according to a Protocol analysis of SEC filings. The social network executive receives a flat $10 million yearly stipend for personal security, and the company spent an additional $13.4 million for his security in 2020. Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg is also one of the most costly to protect at over $7.6 million last year.

With executives working remotely, companies also had to pay more to outfit their home offices to match the security that they would receive at the office. Uber, for example, paid over $120,000 in home office improvements for CEO Dara Khosrowshahi and assigned a security specialist specifically to his home.

Lyft President John Zimmer also climbed the charts and became one of the most costly tech executives to protect. His security now costs the ride-hailing company over $2 million a year, while CEO Logan Green's annual budget is nearly $600,000. (Lyft didn't respond to requests for comment on Zimmer's increased security costs.)



Other companies introduced new security measures. As Zoom's spotlight grew, Zoom paid out over $600,000 in personal security for its CEO Eric Yuan. Amazon's Andy Jassy, who would take over as CEO in 2021, also had security costs listed for the first time: $30,831 for 2020.

Not every company saw a bump in costs. Amazon continues to pay a flat $1.6 million a year for founder Jeff Bezos' security, and he covers the rest. Microsoft doesn't disclose any security costs since its executives pay for their own.

The SEC mandates that companies disclose spending for the personal benefit of their named executive officers — perks like 401(k) matches, health care concierge services and personal security.

"If an executive has a bodyguard, or a chauffeur who acts as a bodyguard who accompanies them when they're out on official company business, that wouldn't tend to get disclosed," said Compensia's Mark Borges. "What happens though is usually the security measures are 24/7, so there's a chunk that is considered a personal expense because it's tied to activities, places or time when the executive supposedly is not on duty or involved in performing their role as executive for the company."

The executive compensation firm found in 2015 that only 7.5% of Bay Area tech companies disclosed protection costs, but Borges said he believes that it's become more commonplace as tech companies become more valuable and the name recognition of CEOs grows. For example, Facebook justifies its security costs for Zuckerberg because of his public recognition. "We believe that Mr. Zuckerberg's role puts him in a unique position: He is synonymous with Facebook and, as a result, negative sentiment regarding our company is directly associated with, and often transferred to, Mr. Zuckerberg," the company says in its filing. (Full disclosure: The author's husband works for Facebook.)

With companies providing at-home security for an executive suite now working from home, Borges thinks the costs may continue to rise.

Stay-at-home orders may have cut some of the costs, as Moyer said his international travel team was effectively grounded as both business and personal travel abroad was halted. But his residential team was active in protecting homes, now that the workplace moved into the living room. His team also spent a lot of time beefing up home security measures against both physical attacks and cyber threats. They installed new home security systems, revamped safe rooms and have a staff of drone pilots to map and protect sprawling estates.

Part of the increase in security costs was also just protecting the executives from the threat of COVID-19 by enforcing protocols. Instead of traveling alongside clients in jets or in cars, some opted to have their protection trail in a "chase car" so that they weren't in enclosed spaces together.

Similar to what was disclosed by the tech companies in filings, Moyer says his firm's revenue went up in the year. It's hard to tell though how much of the increase is a byproduct of the pandemic versus the growing profile (and notoriety) of executives, he said.

"There's a lot of concern that these high-profile executives can be targets of terrorists or kidnappers or other ne'er-do-wells, and the company has a vested interest in protecting them and allowing them to perform their duties without having to worry about their own personal safety," Moyer said.

Fintech

Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories
Bulletins