The CFPB’s post-sandbox fintech approach

The first company to receive a no-action letter from the CFPB pulled out of the program after the agency declared it ineffective.

A "CFPB" sign next to an American flag

The AI lender Upstart has split from the CFPB immunity program.

Photo: Getty Images

The mutual split between AI-driven lender Upstart and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau offers a look inside the agency's fast-evolving approach to fintech.

The CFPB last week revoked a no-action letter granting limited regulatory immunity to Upstart, a publicly traded fintech company whose AI-driven underwriting in 2021 helped originate nearly $12 billion in loans through lending partners, according to the CFPB. CFPB Director Rohit Chopra had recently declared no-action letters and the agency’s related fintech sandbox program “ineffective.”

Upstart said it requested the letter’s termination in response to “changing priorities” at the agency, as well as the “need to keep our risk models accurate and up-to-date during a period of significant economic change,” Nat Hoopes, Upstart’s vice president and head of public policy and regulatory affairs, said in a company blog post.

Rigorous evaluation

The CFPB under the Trump administration planned to help bring new products to market by issuing no-action letters to certain businesses and by launching a regulatory sandbox within the agency’s innovation office. In May, Chopra, who was nominated to the agency by President Joe Biden, said the CFPB would reorganize that office and shift away from efforts that place "special regulatory treatment on individual companies.”

Upstart was granted the agency’s first-ever no-action letter in 2017 and had it extended for three years in 2020. The letter provided assurance that the CFPB would not pursue a fair-lending action against the company during that time.

Weeks before that announcement, Upstart had notified the CFPB that it planned to add new variables to its underwriting and pricing model—notice the company was required to give under the terms of the letter. The CFPB said it needed time to “rigorously evaluate" those changes. Part of the regulator’s concern was how the no-action letter could be seen by the public.

"In light of the risk that the [no-action letter] is misconstrued as an endorsement, the CFPB would need to perform more rigorous monitoring and assessment of Upstart’s model and any changes to the model," according to a notice of termination signed by Chopra.

Upstart "correctly identified" that this review would prevent the company from making quick business decisions, the notice added. On May 27, Upstart asked to have its no-action letter expiration moved up by 18 months, from Nov. 30, 2023 to the end of May.

The CFPB under its prior leadership had promoted the results of the sandbox program. In 2019, the agency’s blog re-published results from an Upstart-run analysis — which was required for the no-action letter — that found its lending model expanded access to credit when compared to traditional lending, though the CFPB made clear it had not replicated the results and does not promote the product.

The next sandbox

While the CFPB is still taking applications for the sandbox and no-action letter programs, it is encouraging companies to instead file formal rule-making petitions when seeking regulatory clarity. The CFPB's sandbox was not widely used — only four other companies received a no-action letter — but it was the most prominent effort on the federal level. There are 11 states with some form of regulatory sandboxes, a concept first tested in the U.K.

The recently proposed cryptocurrency regulation bill from Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand calls for a federal regulatory sandbox, which would allow crypto companies to test new products across state lines. Lummis hopes the sandbox will help innovation “flourish in its early stages.”

Proponents of sandboxes, including Republicans on the House Committee on Financial Services, say the CFPB's move will make it harder to bring new products to market. But consumer watchdog groups, which widely opposed the CFPB's sandbox when it was first proposed, say the agency is right to shift away from the effort.

"Regulatory processes already allow for all stakeholders to 'kick the tires' of new proposed rules to ensure they are fit for purpose," said Mark Hays, a senior policy analyst on fintech at Americans for Financial Reform.

Widespread state-level sandbox programs, such as the one proposed in the crypto bill, “could simply create a race to the bottom,” Hays added.

Fintech focus

Along with reorganizing the innovation office, Chopra’s CFPB has pushed to expand its oversight authority over non-bank institutions, including technology providers for the financial industry. The agency has announced probes of employer-driven debt and “buy now, pay later” companies while warning about the risks of bias from algorithms used by financial institutions.

"Tech, fintech and the use of data more generally are a clear priority of the bureau, based not only on the experience at the FTC that Rohit Chopra has, but it's very timely [with] the growth of fintech," Michael Gordon, an attorney with Ballard Spahr and former top CFPB official, said on a podcast analyzing Chopra's first six months in office. That interest will likely involve the agency bringing more enforcement actions, he added.

Upstart declined to comment about what the absence of a no-action letter means for its business, but the firm cited the loss of the letter among risk factors for investors in its most recent earnings report. The company said it will “continue to rigorously test" its loan applications for fairness and hopes to work closely with the CFPB’s new Office of Competition and Innovation.

“Effective cooperation between the government and financial technology innovators remains critical to improving financial access for the millions of borrowers left behind by America’s current credit system,” wrote Hoopes.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories