I lost my job in China’s ed tech crackdown

As a parent myself, I am all for easing the burden on kids. As a worker hurt by the new policy, I feel helpless.

A desk in an empty office.

Beijing's ed tech crackdown has resulted in massive layoffs.

Photo: Con Keyes/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Editor's note: Beijing's sweeping crackdown on China's once-lucrative ed tech and private tutoring industry — which mandates existing disciplinary tutoring companies register as nonprofit organizations and bans them from financing through public listings —has triggered massive layoffs. The author of the story, nicknamed Kele, is one of the tech workers who lost his job following the policy overhaul.

This article is translated and adapted by Protocol's Shen Lu from a recent episode of Story FM, with permission. It has been edited for clarity. Story FM (故事 FM) is one of the most popular Chinese podcasts, featuring personal stories narrated in the first person by ordinary Chinese from the margins to the mainstream. It has 2 million listeners across the world. Listen to the original story in Kele's own voice here (Mandarin).

I worked as a programmer at a large private tutoring company in Beijing. I lost my job on Aug. 13.

That day, my manager called me to a meeting when I was discussing bugs with colleagues from other teams. She started the conversation by beating around the bush. But I knew what might be coming; management had quickly responded to new education rules by restructuring. Some colleagues had been called to meetings that morning; I had expected the worst. So I told her, "Let's cut to the chase."

She explained that even though I had impressive skills, the company now only needed to keep workers for general business operations. She said she was sorry. I said calmly, "I understand." I heard that the layoffs were company wide. My department alone laid off dozens.

I started this job about a year ago. Looking back, it was the heyday of the ed tech industry, when every major player was extensively recruiting and expanding office buildings, and their ads appeared in every elevator and every subway car. My company employed tens of thousands of people across China. On the first day of work, I felt that I was finally working for a decent internet company.

Rumors about a strict crackdown on the education industry started circulating around the Lunar New Year holiday. The actual tightening began in April, which set off the initial wave of panic, and companies started to consider transition plans and responses to forthcoming policies.

The shoe dropped on July 24, when the "double alleviation" policy finally came down. [Editor's note: The stated purpose of Beijing's new rules is to alleviate the burden of homework and after-school tutoring for students. In China, this is known as the "double alleviation" policy.] It was a Saturday. My WeChat Moment feed was flooded with news and discussions about the new rules. Reactions ran the gamut. Messages in the parents groups I joined came in nonstop. Most of those who were against the policy worked in the tutoring industry and were facing layoffs. Some of the more open-minded parents who hated after-school tuition with a passion were very supportive of the policy.

As a parent myself, I am all for easing the burden on kids. Parents should accompany children as they grow, rather than leaving them in the hands of teachers. I think the "double alleviation" policy is a wake-up call for parents, reminding them of their responsibilities.

As a worker impacted by the new policy, I feel helpless. But I'll just have to deal with it. The private tutoring market is indeed distorted. Tutoring is a profit-making tool for companies. Nobody is running a tutoring company as a public service with a sense of mission. So I think in some way, the government strike is inevitable.

I've also seen the ugliness of a big company. So I don't regret leaving it now. Every middle manager was extremely territorial. They were not trying to get things done, but only to build their own turf so no one could threaten their position. A week before the layoffs, the management convened, and they shared a video of their meeting with us. In the meeting, the executives said, "At this stage, we must not take the wind out of the government's sails. At this stage, we must avoid disciplinary education. At this stage, we must not challenge the government's bottom line." The emphasis was on "at this stage." I don't trust tutoring companies; they are capital-driven. And I have zero trust in capital.

After I signed paperwork with HR for employment termination, I went back to my desk, took a deep breath and then texted my wife: "I was laid off." She didn't reply. So I called her. She suggested rather cooly, "Shall we return to our hometown?"

I am from a small town. There aren't many job opportunities there. If we went back, we'd basically be eating into our savings or finding gigs through friends. I was not ready for that. By the end of our call, we were both in a bad mood.

My wife is also in the education industry. Our life in Beijing looks decent, but we are actually only getting by. We are Beijing drifters. We don't have a Beijing Hukou. [Editor's note: The Hukou refers to China's Household Registration System, which determines each person's permanent residence and access to benefits and social services, and often penalizes urban migrants.] Our car doesn't have a local plate. We have a child to put through school and a mortgage to pay off. My severance can only last us for three months, at most.

People think that it'd be easy for a software engineer to find a new job. But not really. There aren't many options for programmers at my age. Companies will hire a 30-year-old software engineer, but not a 30-year-old entry-level software engineer. They will take into account the cost and risk of hiring programmers like me. I am facing a transition in my career. And it'd take me much longer to master a new skill or a new field than it would for the company to get a recent graduate.

Though I acted calm about my layoff, deep down I was devastated. My wife and child were not home that day. So I asked a few former colleagues out for dinner, hoping to see if there might be self-employment opportunities. I had a glass of beer, and it was a little too much. I felt dizzy and sick when I got home. I slept on the couch that night.

At dawn, I woke up. Sitting on the couch and looking at my untidy reflection in the mirror, I felt afraid.


Google is developing a low-end Chromecast with Google TV

The new dongle will run the Google TV interface, but it won’t support 4K streaming.

The Chromecast with Google TV dongle combined 4K streaming with the company’s Google TV interface. Now, Google is looking to launch a cheaper version.

Photo: Google

Google is working on a new streaming device that caters to people with older TV sets: The next Chromecast streaming dongle will run its Google TV interface and ship with a remote control, but it won’t support 4K streaming. The device will instead max out at a resolution of 1080p, Protocol has learned from a source with close knowledge of the company’s plans.

A Google spokesperson declined to comment.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

Why software releases should be quick but 'palatable and realistic'

Modern software developers release updates much more quickly than in the past, which is great for security and adding new capabilities. But Edith Harbaugh thinks business leaders need a little control of that schedule.

LaunchDarkly was founded in 2014 to help companies manage the software release cycle.

Photo: LaunchDarkly

Gone are the days of quarterly or monthly software update release cycles; today’s software development organizations release updates and fixes on a much more frequent basis. Edith Harbaugh just wants to give business leaders a modicum of control over the process.

The CEO of LaunchDarkly, which was founded in 2014 to help companies manage the software release cycle, is trying to reach customers who want to move fast but understand that moving fast and breaking things won’t work for them. Companies that specialize in continuous integration and continuous delivery services have thrived over the last few years as customers look for help shipping at speed, and LaunchDarkly extends those capabilities to smaller features of existing software.

Keep Reading Show less
Tom Krazit

Tom Krazit ( @tomkrazit) is Protocol's enterprise editor, covering cloud computing and enterprise technology out of the Pacific Northwest. He has written and edited stories about the technology industry for almost two decades for publications such as IDG, CNET, paidContent, and GeekWire, and served as executive editor of Gigaom and Structure.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Building an antiracist company: From idea to practice

Twilio’s chief diversity officer says it’s time for a new approach to DEI.

“The most impactful way to prioritize DEI and enable antiracism is to structure your company accordingly,” says Lybra Clemons, chief diversity officer at Twilio.

Photo: Twilio

Lybra Clemons is responsible for guiding and scaling inclusion strategy and diversity initiatives at Twilio.

I’ve been in the corporate diversity, equity and inclusion space for over 15 years. In that time, I’ve seen the field evolve slowly from a “nice-to-have” function of Human Resources to a rising company-wide priority. June 2020 was different. Suddenly my and my peers’ phones started ringing off the hook and DEI leaders became the most sought-after professionals. With so many DEI roles being created and corporate willingness to invest, for a split second it looked like there might be real change on the horizon.

Keep Reading Show less
Lybra Clemons
Lybra S. Clemons is a seasoned C-suite executive with over 15 years of Human Resources, Talent and Diversity & Inclusion experience at Fortune 500 companies. She is responsible for guiding and scaling inclusion strategy and diversity initiatives across Twilio's global workforce. Prior to Twilio, Lybra was global head of Diversity & Inclusion at PayPal, where she managed and oversaw all global diversity initiatives. Lybra has held critical roles in Diversity & Inclusion with Morgan Stanley, The Brunswick Group and American Express. She serves on the board of directors of Makers and How Women Lead Silicon Valley Executive Board of Advisers, and has been recognized by Black Enterprise as one of the Top Corporate Women in Diversity.

Why China is outselling the US in EVs 5 to 1

Electric cars made up 14.8% of Chinese car sales in 2021, compared with 4.1% in the U.S.

Passenger EV sales in China in 2021 jumped 169.1% to nearly 3.3 million from a year ago.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

When Tesla entered China in 2014, the country’s EV market was going through a reset. The Austin, Texas-based automaker created a catfish effect — a strong competitor that compels weaker peers to up their game — in China’s EV market for the past few years. Now, Tesla’s sardine-sized Chinese competitors have grown into big fishes in the tank, gradually weakening Tesla’s own prominence in the field.

2021 was a banner year for China’s EV industry. The latest data from the China Passenger Car Association shows that total passenger EV sales in China in 2021 jumped 169.1% from a year ago to nearly 2.99 million: about half of all EVs sold globally. Out of every 100 passenger cars sold in China last year, almost 15 were so-called "new energy vehicles" (NEVs) — a mix of battery-electric vehicles and hybrids.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Latest Stories