Beijing wants to make the internet less annoying

New regulations try to clamp down on the stuff users everywhere hate the most.


Beijing has issued a yearlong wave of internet regulations.

Photo: Zhang Kaiyv/Unsplash

In a year when people can't keep track of how many "tech crackdowns" have already happened in China, it's easy to miss one regulation that came out on Monday: From November to March, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology says it will work on correcting many annoying phenomena that people are familiar with in the internet age, including deceptive cell phone and broadband plans, long and confusing terms and conditions, relentless pop-up ads, overpriced cloud services and more.

More than anything else, this new regulatory manifesto reads like a compilation of complaints from ordinary internet users. The trouble of finding the right "X" on a pop-up ad, the fear of privacy being shredded by invasive apps and endless micro-payments to unlock basic product features — these are the things that make everyday scrolling and tapping ever more insufferable, not only in China but around the world.

To domestic observers, one clause about cloud service providers has stood out the most: The MIIT is asking cloud service companies "to ensure that the file download and upload speed meets users' basic needs even if they haven't paid for premium services."

Weibo users are joking that this clause is targeting Baidu Wangpan without mentioning its name. Wangpan is the leading provider of personal cloud storage and file-sharing services, comparable to Google Drive. But while Google Drive charges extra for storage space, Baidu charges a fee to increase download and upload speed. Downloading a file could take days for an unpaid user, and only minutes for a paid one. Technically, users do have options: They can either be a premium member or a "super member," or just purchase 15-minute-long or daylong speed booster packs.

Chinese tech companies have often been praised for experimenting with new products and business models that Silicon Valley has yet to wrap its head around. But this also means powerful tech companies are quick to find new ways to exploit consumers, or at least inconvenience them enough that they decide to pay. In October, a comedy sketch satirizing over a dozen such sneaky tricks went viral.

The latest regulation by the MIIT shows that Beijing is also learning quickly, evolving its internet governance to match the often annoying innovations of China's private sector.

This is not the only campaign Chinese regulatory bodies have launched that is actually celebrated by the Chinese people. Regulators have vowed to make the internet less deceptive for senior citizens and have banned the common "link-blocking" practice that platforms use to reduce bounce rates. In fact, one of the most high-profile "crackdowns" of this year, targeting video games for underage players, is also welcomed by parents.

But what makes things trickier in China is that these campaigns can serve a mix of different state goals. By introducing more restrictions, Beijing is putting checks on tech companies that are growing out of control, gaining legitimacy by addressing citizens' concerns, and, after all, making the internet less annoying. It's further complicated when there are also regulations that aim to ramp up censorship, increase state influence on private companies or just punish individuals like Jack Ma who had gone beyond the limit.

This is not to say all these shady profit-driven practices on the internet will disappear tomorrow. The MIIT's wording of the latest regulation also left ample room for interpretation and maneuvering. To cite the cloud service provider regulation again, some people on social media questioned what it means that the speed has to meet "users' basic needs." What if tech companies claim that to download a file in 24 hours is enough for basic needs? This kind of vagueness leaves wiggle room for Beijing to pressure tech companies while not killing the industry's business potential.

But it's showing both Chinese people and people around the world that there is a way for governments to be more proactive in making the internet less annoying. There will be lessons for other regulators, both in the positive outcomes and the problems of state power concentration. Maybe U.S. politicians should start to take notes today.


We’ll be here again: How tech companies fail to prevent terrorism

Social media platforms are playing defense to stop mass shootings. Without cooperation and legislation, it’s not working.

The Buffalo attack showed that tech’s best defenses against online hate aren’t sophisticated enough to fight the algorithms designed by those same companies to promote content.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Tech platforms' patchwork approach to content moderation has made them a hotbed for hate speech that can turn deadly, as it did this weekend in Buffalo. The alleged shooter that killed 10 in a historically Black neighborhood used Discord to plan his rampage for months and livestreamed it on Twitch.

The move mirrors what happened in Christchurch, New Zealand, when a white supremacist murdered 51 people in a mosque in 2019. He viewed the killings as a meme. To disseminate that meme, he turned to the same place more than 1 billion other users do: Facebook. This pattern is destined to repeat itself as long as tech companies continue to play defense instead of offense against online hate and fail to work together.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

SAP’s leadership vacuum on display with Hasso Plattner’s last stand

Conflict of interest questions, blowback to the Ukraine response and a sinking stock price hang in the backdrop of Plattner’s last election to the SAP supervisory board.

Plattner will run for a final two-year transition term atop SAP’s supervisory board.

Photo: Soeren Stache/picture alliance via Getty Images

Just one man has been with SAP over its entire 50-year history: co-founder Hasso Plattner. Now, the 78-year-old software visionary is making his last stand.

On Wednesday, Plattner will run for a final two-year transition term atop SAP’s supervisory board, an entity mandated by law in Germany that basically oversees the executive team. Leaders at SAP, for example, report to the supervisory board, not the CEO.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


Why Google Cloud is providing security for AWS and Azure users too

“To just focus on Google Cloud, we wouldn't be serving our customers,” Google Cloud security chief Phil Venables told Protocol.

Google Cloud announced the newest addition to its menu of security offerings.

Photo: G/Unsplash

In August, Google Cloud pledged to invest $10 billion over five years in cybersecurity — a target that looks like it will be easily achieved, thanks to the $5.4 billion deal to acquire Mandiant and reported $500 million acquisition of Siemplify in the first few months of 2022 alone.

But the moves raise questions about Google Cloud’s main goal for its security operation. Does Google want to offer the most secure cloud platform in order to inspire more businesses to run on it — or build a major enterprise cybersecurity products and services business, in whatever environment it’s chosen?

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


The tools that make you pay for not getting stuff done

Some tools let you put your money on the line for productivity. Should you bite?

Commitment contracts are popular in a niche corner of the internet, and the tools have built up loyal followings of people who find the extra motivation effective.

Photoillustration: Anna Shvets/Pexels; Protocol

Danny Reeves, CEO and co-founder of Beeminder, is used to defending his product.

“When people first hear about it, they’re kind of appalled,” Reeves said. “Making money off of people’s failure is how they view it.”

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Latest Stories