Death of a Bilibili censor reignites overwork debates in China

The unexpected death of a content moderation worker at Bilibili brings the plight of Chinese censors into focus.

Bilibili logo

Content moderation is critical to keep platforms running, but the individuals toiling away behind the screens are certainly not treated as essential workers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Content moderation is challenging, largely hidden work all over the globe. China’s tens of thousands of content moderators are no exception: They’re an invisible, overworked workforce who keep social apps from Douyin and WeChat to Bilibili and Weibo running. But unlike other overworked groups, such as gig delivery workers, their plight was nearly unknown to the public until the recent tragic death of a worker at one of China’s leading video platforms.

On Feb. 4, a 25-year-old content moderator for Bilibili died from a brain bleed. Screenshots floating online that his colleagues at Bilibili leaked to a tech blogger showed that he was asked to work extra shifts during the Lunar New Year, when almost the entire country’s workforce was on holiday. But Bilibili denied in an internal email he had worked overtime before his death, emphasizing he only worked regular eight-hour shifts the previous week.

Bilibili’s response to the unexpected death and ensuing public criticism was to hire 1,000 additional moderators to reduce individuals’ workloads, and to offer additional health screening and mental health counseling to the existing censorship workers.

The tragic death startled tens of millions of Chinese web users, sparking heated online discussions about the demanding nature of low-level work in Chinese tech companies, as well as the pervasiveness of censorship in China. The incident also prompted many former and current censors for various Chinese internet platforms to come out and talk about their own grueling experiences.

Content moderation is critical to keep platforms running, but the individuals toiling away behind the screens are certainly not treated as essential workers. One former Bilibili content moderator, using the pseudonym Chen Rou, told Chinese news aggregator Sohu that cameras are installed throughout the office to monitor them 24/7, and team leaders micromanage workers’ lunch breaks. The worst part, they added, is the endless overtime and performance assessments: If a content moderator wishes to pass monthly assessments, they must spend no more than 24 seconds screening each video clip, and must screen at least 1,500 clips per day. If a new hire missed the target too often, they’d be fired during their six-month probation period. “To save their jobs, new hires often have to clock in voluntary hours to make up for the set quota,” the worker said.

The salaries don’t match the stress of the job, Chen added, telling Sohu that a front-line content moderator’s monthly take-home pay after taxes is about 4,000 RMB ($631). In comparison, the 2021 average monthly base salary for private sector workers in Shanghai was 8,528 RMB ($1,348). And if someone fails the monthly exam, they’ll only get half that pay, another pseudonymous former Bilibili content moderator, Zhou Zhuo, said. This wage has barely budged from what a content moderator was paid 10 years ago, according to Liu Lipeng, who worked as an internet censor and a content quality manager at several Chinese tech companies for nearly 10 years.

Just like other tech jobs in China, logging in overtime is commonplace. White-collar tech workers are theoretically no longer held to the so-called “996” schedule, but content moderators face an even more exhausting schedule. According to the former Bilibili censorship workers, they had to work a 12-hour shift every other day. On top of that, they were required to provide support from home during their off hours, and if their shifts ran long by less than two hours, there was no overtime pay for them. “To meet their KPIs, some people might log in an extra six to eight hours,” Zhou told Sohu.

Moderation and censorship

Content moderation jobs are some of the most labor-intensive at any social platform in any country. Censorship workers at Chinese companies describe an unforgiving work environment much similar to what their peers at U.S. firms such as Facebook have reported: It’s an overly taxing, yet low-paying, job that leaves them barely any breaks throughout a long shift. The workers are heavily exposed to spam, crime, abuse, violence and more. In the U.S., a former content moderator in 2018 sued Meta (then Facebook), alleging that she developed PTSD on the job, resulting in Facebook paying $52 million in a class-action settlement.

But in China, the stakes are much higher. Not only do moderators have to handle objectionable content, but also they have to contend with outsized demand for political censorship. Workplace trauma is rarely discussed in public, even though Chinese content moderators arguably work under more extreme circumstances than their peers globally. In the U.S., censors missing something major could result in a bad PR cycle and maybe a Congressional hearing. In China, the consequences are more grave: The entire platform could be immediately shut down.

Even though many Chinese web users self-censor, and political speech comprises only a tiny part of deleted online content, “company executives are always on edge,” a former ByteDance tech worker told Protocol.

To mitigate risk, social platforms have developed AI-powered tools to make content moderators’ work more efficient. Still, they rely heavily on armies of censors to manually screen everything that’s posted online and, in the case of videos, before it goes live.

TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, employs the biggest number of content moderators among Chinese tech companies by far: It has about 20,000 contract and in-house censors.

Not every Chinese tech company is as deep-pocketed as ByteDance, for sure. Bilibili, the firm at the center of the current controversy, revealed in a prospectus submitted to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange that by the end of 2020, it employed 2,413 moderators. That was 28% of its total workforce at the time. In comparison, Meta has more than 15,000 content moderators handling content on its platforms, though many are employed by contracting firms.

Like Meta and other U.S. social media platforms, Chinese tech companies also are increasingly outsourcing their content moderator workers to lower costs. Contract content moderation firms in the past five years have sprung up in second- or third-tier Chinese cities such as Jinan, Tianjin, Chengdu and Xi’an. To help expand their content moderation forces, the companies also lowered the education requirement for the workers. Liu told Protocol that when he was first hired as a content moderator for Weibo in 2011, all the new hires had college degrees. Today, it’s common for graduates of vocational schools or even high schools to get those jobs, he said.

“To some degree, a Chinese tech company's censorship mechanism determines the kind of social media product they can offer,” said Liu. “ByteDance is able to achieve a host of features in their products because of the size of their content moderation team.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories