Protocol | China

China’s Big Tech legal teams are unbeatable on their home courts, literally

Opponents fear to sue teams like Tencent's "Nanshan Indominables" and Huawei's "Longgang Invincibles."

China’s Big Tech legal teams are unbeatable on their home courts, literally

It's clear Tencent prefers local courts.

Photo: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In late March, TikTok's parent company ByteDance dropped an unfair competition lawsuit against Tencent. Upon Tencent's request, the matter had been relocated to a court in Shenzhen, the tech-intensive southern metropolis where Tencent has its headquarters.

Many on the internet speculated that Douyin knew it had a slim chance of winning. After all, it was facing a suit on defendant Tencent's home court, where its proclivity to win has earned its legal team the nickname "Nanshan Indominables" (南山必胜客) on China's web, named after the district where Tencent's offices are based. Douyin, which disputed the change of venue, ultimately dropped its suit.

Small wonder. A data analysis of public court rulings by the Chinese newspaper Dahe Daily found that between 2018 and 2020, out of a total 564 matters involving Tencent as either the plaintiff or the defendant, Tencent won 95% of those litigated in Shenzhen courts. By contrast, the newspaper found Tencent's win rate in Beijing courts to be 54%. The analysis didn't track suits that settled. Tencent declined to comment.

Douyin filed its suit in the coastal city of Fuzhou, a large city in Fujian province, in September 2019. It alleged Tencent had violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law by banning Douyin links shared on Tencent's social media platforms QQ and WeChat. Douyin requested a preliminary injunction and compensation of $13.9 million.

Protocol was unable to verify the Dahe Daily data, but Mark Cohen, a senior fellow and director of the Asia IP Project at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, told Protocol that local protectionism is often apparent in Chinese court rulings. In China, judges are generally locally appointed. An academic study found that the stronger party — the party with greater resources, more experience or in a better strategic position — in a legal tussle tends to prevail in Chinese litigation. And in a case involving local and out-of-town parties, the local one, especially a bread-and-butter institution, often comes out ahead, as the government and the business can both influence the outcome through back channels

Generally, in an IP dispute, "if you're a foreigner, or you're from out of town, and there's not a huge local interest, you'll probably get fair treatment," Cohen said. "But it's when other economic or national policy interests are implicated that you start seeing the scales of justice get unbalanced."

Tencent is not the only company known for triumphing at a high win rate in local courts. ByteDance, for instance, is sometimes called the "Haidian Roly-Polys" (海淀不倒翁) in the Haidian District of Beijing, where its headquarters are based, presumably because it can't be knocked over. Huawei, headquartered in the Longgang District of Shenzhen, is the "Longgang Invincibles" (龙岗无敌手). Cohen said he had looked into Huawei's legal outcomes in the past, and what he found validates Huawei's reputation. "I heard from many companies who have gotten in fights of various kinds with Huawei," Cohen said, "that the last place they want to go is Shenzhen."

It's clear Tencent prefers local courts. In February, Douyin filed a separate case against Tencent in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, alleging Tencent violated antitrust rules by blocking the sharing of Douyin content on its messaging apps. A month later, Tencent played the same game, requesting the Beijing court transfer the matter to Shenzhen. (The suit is ongoing.)

These days, antitrust cases can have very serious outcomes. Ecommerce titan Alibaba was slapped with a record $2.75 billion fine by China's antitrust regulators earlier this month amid a broad and harsh crackdown on anticompetitive practices by Big Tech.

China's legal system is not precedent based like the U.S. or U.K. systems — where a judge's decision is binding on future ones — but judges do strive to be consistent with their decisions. The last high-profile antitrust case Tencent was involved in was years ago, when the cybersecurity firm Qihoo 360 and Tencent sued one another for unfair competition. In 2014, the Supreme People's Court issued a landmark ruling on the dispute, dismissing Qihoo 360's claims against Tencent. Angela Zhang, associate professor of law at the University of Hong Kong, said that matter essentially set precedent for other courts, making it harder for plaintiffs to challenge Tencent's dominance.

The general perception of local protectionism is broadly accurate, but doesn't make for slam dunks. "Chinese judges, especially those from developed regions such as Guangdong, have become very professional after rounds of judicial reform," Zhang said. "Blatant corruption in those highly professionalized courts is uncommon these days."

And local businesses worldwide prefer to have local courts handle their legal disputes. "[Local companies] simply know the judges in their home jurisdiction better, not necessarily in person, but also in understanding their preference and belief," Zhang said. "This information advantage helps local firms better frame their arguments and present them in court."

Protocol | Policy

Tech giants want to hire Afghan refugees. The system’s in the way.

Amazon, Facebook and Uber have all committed to hiring and training Afghan evacuees. But executing on that promise is another story.

"They're authorized to work, but their authorization has an expiration date."

Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Late last month, Amazon, Facebook and Uber joined dozens of other companies in publicly committing to hire and train some of the 95,000 Afghan refugees who are expected to be resettled in the United States over the next year, about half of whom are already here.

But nearly two months since U.S. evacuations from Kabul ended and one month since the companies' public commitments, efforts to follow through with those promised jobs remain stalled. That, experts say, is partly to do with the fact that the vast majority of Afghan arrivals are still being held at military bases, partly to do with their legal classification and partly to do with a refugee resettlement system that was systematically dismantled by the Trump administration.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | Fintech

How European fintech startup N26 is preparing for U.S. regulations

"There's a lot more scrutiny being placed on fintech. We are definitely mindful of it."

In an interview with Protocol, Stephanie Balint, N26's U.S. general manager, discussed the company's approach to regulations in the U.S.

Photo: N26

N26's monster $900 million funding round announced Monday underlined the German startup's momentum in the digital banking market.

Stephanie Balint, N26's U.S. general manager, said the funding will be used for expansion and also to improve "our core offering to make this the most reliable bank that our customers can trust," she told Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Apple’s new MacBooks are the future — and the past

After years of reinventing the wheel, Apple's back to just building really good ones.

Apple brought back the ports.

Photo: Apple

The 2015 Pro was, by most accounts, one of the best laptops Apple ever made. It was fast and functional, and it had a great screen, a MagSafe charger, plenty of ports, a great keyboard and solid battery life. If you walked around practically any office in Silicon Valley, you'd see Pros everywhere.

Many of those users have been holding on to their increasingly old and dusty 2015 Pros, too, because right about when that computer came out was when Apple seemed to lose its way in the laptop market. It released the 12-inch MacBook, an incredibly thin and light computer that made a bunch of changes — a new keyboard and trackpad design chief among them — that eventually made their way around the rest of the MacBook lineup. Then came the Touch Bar, Apple's attempt to build an entirely new user interface into a laptop.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Imagine a company where there are no meetings — just time for deep, focused work punctuated by short conversations on Slack and project updates on Trello.

Now imagine a company where the no-meeting ethos is so ingrained that it's possible to work there for 10 years without ever speaking face-to-face with a single coworker, and for your boss to not even recognize the sound of your voice.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Latest Stories