Source Code: Your daily look at what matters in tech.

chinachinaauthorDave YinNoneDavid Wertime and our data-obsessed China team analyze China tech for you. Every Wednesday, with alerts on key stories and research.9338dd5bb5

Get access to Protocol

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber
Protocol | China

Beijing's costly plans for cybersecurity 'self-sufficiency'

A new government initiative means potentially quadrupling multibillion-dollar domestic spend.

Workers in a Chinese office.

Workers in a Chinese office.

Photo: Getty Images

Amid China's multipronged efforts to command and secure its wealth of data, as well as hacking allegations being flung between the country and an alliance of Western nations and bodies including the U.S., the EU, Japan and NATO, Chinese regulators have announced plans to grow the country's cybersecurity industry as much as fourfold within less than three years.

The draft plan, published July 12 by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, aims to grow the industry to 250 billion yuan ($38.7 billion) by 2023, citing growing demand from emerging technologies including 5G, IoT, the industrial internet, smart vehicles and cities, cloud and AI, as well as sectors including manufacturing, natural resources, health care, consumer products, finance, transportation, education and more.

Strengthening China's cybersecurity industry would support the country's 2017 Cyber Security Law and last month's Data Security Law, as well as the 14th Five-Year Plan released in March, an economic blueprint that dedicated an entire section on digitizing the nation and making everything from factories to cities "smart."

An ambitious goal

According to the draft industry plan, by 2023 telecom and other "crucial sectors" must also dedicate at least 10% of their IT budgets to cybersecurity investments. While the MIIT did not disclose its valuation of the existing market, it said the target would be achieved with a compound annual growth rate of "more than 15%," suggesting its estimate of the industry at present is around $29 billion.

But MIIT statements contrast starkly with analyst projections. According to figures released in May by the IDC, China's domestic cybersecurity market is worth only $10.2 billion in 2021. By comparison, the U.S.'s is worth $65 billion this year. While the market research firm predicts a high average compound growth rate of 16.8% for China's sector, it would still reach just $14.4 billion by 2023, less than half of what MIIT is expecting.

According to Samm Sacks, a cyber policy fellow at think tank New America, the MIIT sometimes sets overly ambitious goals, especially if, as in this case, it's able to influence both supply and demand.

"The growth of the digital economy has driven demand for cyber security," she told Protocol. "On demand, the spate of cybersecurity regulations and standards mean companies need to buy products and services to be compliant and keep up with best practices. On the supply side, state R&D subsidies and tax breaks create incentives for new entrants."

Already, cybersecurity startups have sprung up in response to a combination of venture capital and state support, with some looking to unseat industry incumbents such as Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. and Kingsoft, Sacks added.

While the plan does not include additional concrete measures for achieving growth, it outlines the need to ramp up education, funding and industrial incentives on both the national and local levels. For example, the draft plan says, funds earmarked for upgrades in the manufacturing sector could be used to purchase cybersecurity products. MIIT is also tasking local governments with facilitating the creation of pilot zones and asking companies to invest and pool their resources, such as via industry consolidation.

The plan's brief mention of promoting international cooperation focuses on the establishment of overseas research centers, joint laboratories and conferences.

"In other words, the plan refers more to the absorption of technology by Chinese entities from overseas sources rather than welcoming foreign companies to become players … in China," said Lester Ross, a partner and head of the Beijing office of WilmerHale, an international law firm. "China is indeed intent upon the pursuit of self-sufficiency in this industry which it regards as intimately linked to national security."

The bigger picture

On Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian hit back against the U.S., calling it "the world's largest source of cyber attacks" after the Biden administration and allies including the EU, Australia, the U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Japan and NATO jointly accused China of being behind a massive hack of Microsoft Exchange email servers.

Meanwhile, China's public, private and foreign sectors are grappling with an emerging national data governance regime that has seen the country's tech giants in the crosshairs of regulators for alleged misuse of data.

Earlier this month, just days after ride-hailing giant DiDi's $4.4 billion U.S. IPO, Chinese authorities announced a probe into the company over its collection and use of personal data, pulling dozens of its apps from app stores, fueling speculation that the company had transferred sensitive information to the U.S. despite a lack of clear charges and evidence. Sources close to DiDi have denied wrongdoing.

In the days that followed, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the country's internet regulator, ordered so-called "cybersecurity reviews" for any company with 1 million users or more that wants to list overseas, something some observers say is motivated by concerns over national security risks posed by firms offering IT products and services.

And according to a June report by the Wall Street Journal, Ant Group is in discussions with state-owned firms to create a credit-scoring company, effectively conceding its vast troves of consumer data to regulators after years of resistance.

These developments underline a recent seismic shift in the government's approach to data, which it now considers an essential economic resource to be tapped as well as protected.


Google wants to (try to) make Google Glass cool again

Also this week: savvy virtual assistants, surveillance without violating people's privacy, and more patents from Big Tech.

Is making these cool even possible?

Image: Google

This week was so full of fun patent applications that I didn't know where to start. We've got a throwback to 2013, a virtual assistant that knows when I've stopped talking, and headphones that can determine a user's hearing abilities.

But as always, remember that the big tech companies file all kinds of crazy patents for things, and though most never amount to anything, some end up defining the future

Keep Reading Show less
Karyne Levy

Karyne Levy ( @karynelevy) is the West Coast editor at Protocol. Before joining Protocol, Karyne was a senior producer at Scribd, helping to create the original content program. Prior to that she was an assigning editor at NerdWallet, a senior tech editor at Business Insider, and the assistant managing editor at CNET, where she also hosted Rumor Has It for CNET TV. She lives outside San Francisco with her wife, son and lots of pets.

As President of Alibaba Group, I am often asked, "What is Alibaba doing in the U.S.?"

In fact, most people are not aware we have a business in the U.S. because we are not a U.S. consumer-facing service that people use every day – nor do we want to be. Our consumers – nearly 900 million of them – are located in China.

Keep Reading Show less
J. Michael Evans
Michael Evans leads and executes Alibaba Group's international strategy for globalizing the company and expanding its businesses outside of China.

Does Elon Musk make Tesla tech?

Between the massive valuation and the self-driving software, Tesla isn't hard to sell as a tech company. But does that mean that, in 10 years, every car will be tech?

You know what's not tech and is a car company? Volkswagen.

Image: Tesla/Protocol

From disagreements about what "Autopilot" should mean and SolarCity lawsuits to space colonization and Boring Company tunnels, extremely online Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his company stay firmly in the news, giving us all plenty of opportunities to consider whether the company that made electric cars cool counts as tech.

The massive valuation definitely screams tech, as does the company's investment in self-driving software and battery development. But at the end of the day, this might not be enough to convince skeptics that Tesla is anything other than a car company that uses tech. It also raises questions about the role that timeliness plays in calling something tech. In a potential future where EVs are the norm and many run on Tesla's own software — which is well within the realm of possibility — will Tesla lose its claim to a tech pedigree?

Keep Reading Show less
Becca Evans
Becca Evans is a copy editor and producer at Protocol. Previously she edited Carrie Ann Conversations, a wellness and lifestyle publication founded by Carrie Ann Inaba. She's also written for STYLECASTER. Becca lives in Los Angeles.
Protocol | Workplace

Apple isn’t the only tech company spooked by the delta variant

Spooked by rising cases of COVID-19, many tech companies delay their office reopening.

Apple and at least two other Silicon Valley companies have decided to delay their reopenings in response to rising COVID-19 case counts.

Photo: Luis Alvarez via Getty

Apple grabbed headlines this week when it told employees it would delay its office reopening until October or later. But the iPhone maker wasn't alone: At least two other Silicon Valley companies decided to delay their reopenings last week in response to rising COVID-19 case counts.

Both ServiceNow and Pure Storage opted to push back their September return-to-office dates last week, telling employees they can work remotely until at least the end of the year. Other companies may decide to exercise more caution given the current trends.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Protocol | Workplace

Half of working parents have felt discriminated against during COVID

A new survey found that working parents at the VP level are more likely to say they've faced discrimination at work than their lower-level counterparts.

A new survey looks at discrimination faced by working parents during the pandemic.

Photo: d3sign/Getty Images

The toll COVID-19 has taken on working parents — particularly working moms — is, by now, well-documented. The impact for parents in low-wage jobs has been particularly devastating.

But a new survey, shared exclusively with Protocol, finds that among parents who kept their jobs through the pandemic, people who hold more senior positions are actually more likely to say they faced discrimination at work than their lower-level colleagues.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories