Protocol | China

I'm a delivery worker in China. My job is better than you think.

I make good money, and sometimes I ride along Xiamen's seaside road as the sun sets. It's breathtaking.

I'm a delivery worker in China. My job is better than you think.

"People think of food delivery as an inhumane, exploitative job. I disagree. I am like a bee, riding across the city performing my task, all day, every day," writes Xiao Wu, a pseudonymous driver, as told to Protocol's Shen Lu.

Photo: Su Dong/VCG via Getty Images

This is the story of Xiao Wu, a pseudonymous food courier, as told to Protocol's Shen Lu.

Last spring, I moved away from my hometown, Foshan, a city in central Guangdong province, and headed to Xiamen, a port city on China's southeast coast, to become a full-time rider.

People think of food delivery as an inhumane, exploitative job. I disagree. I am like a bee, riding across the city performing my task, all day, every day. My honey harvesting begins the minute I open my eyes. Sometimes I am so busy I skip breakfast and even lunch. It's a tough job, but for experienced riders, it's actually not that hard. And it pays well. I can easily earn 400 yuan ($63) on any given day. [Editor's note: In the first quarter of 2021, China's median monthly disposable income was $418 per person.]

Before moving to Xiamen, I worked at my family's hardware shop. My father didn't pay me well, and I was shop-bound all day. I'm a few months shy of 24 years old, and I only have a middle school diploma, which doesn't leave me many choices. Delivering food on my electric bike is a much easier job compared to manual factory work. And it comes with perks: I get to travel around the beautiful city while I work. I moved to Xiamen because I love the sea. Sometimes, on a delivery trip, I ride along the island's seaside road as the sun sets. It's just breathtaking.

My first delivery job was with Meituan. I was a so-called "special delivery rider" (专送骑手), which is different from my current status as a "crowdsourced rider" (more on that later). Special delivery riders work solely for a Meituan subcontractor, which has quotas to fill. I signed a dispatch contract with the subcontractor, delivering meals within 4 kilometers of my dispatch center. I got paid monthly by the number of orders I delivered.

When I started delivering Meituan's orders, I made 5.25 yuan (82 cents) per order. They'd raise your delivery fee as you got faster and more efficient. I was making 5.8 yuan (91 cents) per order when I left. Additionally, my employer gave us subsidies to cover cell phone bills and bike maintenance fees. And if you maintain good ratings, you get some extra money.

Back then, I had to clock over 10 hours every day to make 8,000 yuan ($1,252) per month. During peak hours, Meituan's system allowed me to take up to eight orders at a time. I just needed to deliver them all within 30 minutes. On a busy day, I'd deliver up to 80 orders a day.

I wouldn't get my pay docked for late deliveries, but occasionally I got yelled at by impatient customers. You just had to suck it up. After the unpleasantries, I'd smoke a cigarette downstairs before dashing out to the next destination. What else could I do? If I argued, I'd risk being reported on. Then Meituan would fine me 500 yuan ($78). If the customer gave me a bad rating instead, the fine would be only 50 yuan ($8).

Sometimes when I felt exhausted, I took little breaks. I learned that as long as I was located outside my delivery radius, the system wouldn't find me, and so it would stop assigning orders to me. I'd sneak out of my delivery zone, to get a bubble tea and chill a little. After I got paid every month, I took a few days off to travel. I've been to Shanghai, Inner Mongolia and Guangxi. I'd love to visit Tibet, but I'm keeping that trip to share with my future girlfriend.

The riders working for the same dispatch center had our own WeChat group. We'd report to the group whenever anyone was stuck in traffic or when they saw traffic police fining bike riders without helmets. I haven't heard of "Mengzhu." [Editor's note: "Mengzhu" is a well-known food delivery worker activist. He was detained by Beijing police in February.] But I've heard of riders elsewhere who had collectively protested docked paychecks by not logging onto the delivery apps. That hasn't happened in our group. In the protestors' minds, they probably thought they were mistreated. But I was content as long as I was making money.

Every month, 200 yuan ($31) was deducted from my paycheck to pay for insurance, which would only cover accidents when I was riding my ebike. There were no benefits whatsoever. But what did I care? I was young.

Earlier this year, I left Meituan to become a crowdsourced rider (众包骑手) for Ele.me. I left without a two-month notice, so I didn't get my last month's paycheck. But that was fine. I was tired of Meituan's various requirements; I wanted more flexibility and autonomy.

Being a crowdsourced rider means I am my own boss. I register for work through an app, and I can control my own schedule. I'm actually working less and earning more these days because I get paid by the kilometer. The farther out I go, the more I earn.

My day goes like this: The minute I wake up, I log onto the Ele.me app. Orders will flood in immediately. I hit the road around 10 a.m. Sometimes I gobble down breakfast — usually two pork buns — while riding. I'll be on the road nonstop until 4 p.m., when I log off. Then I'll eat my lunch/dinner.

I like bad weather. People may think it's miserable delivering food in the pouring rain. But riders actually wish it rained even harder because the money gets a lot better. On a rainy day, the platform will raise our delivery fee to double digits, and I can earn 800 yuan ($125) easily that day. I don't feel pathetic at all; it's just my job.

With my Meituan training, I can now take 11 orders at a time and get them delivered within an hour. When you are a crowdsourced rider, you get fined if you are late. I have to pay for half the price of the meal every time there's a 10-minute delay. It's not a big deal. I can easily make that up by delivering a few more orders.

I know the platforms are being criticized for being unreasonable and exploitative, but they do offer flexible jobs to people like me. Instead of sitting for 12 hours at a factory assembly line, you log on and off whenever you feel like it. The minute I book 300 yuan ($47) in income, I usually call it a day. Once I log out of the app, the system cannot track me anymore. After work, if I don't party with friends, I'll play video games or watch thriller dramas in my apartment.

I like my current job. Anyone can be a crowdsourced rider. These days, when I pick up orders at restaurants, I often bump into college students who are doing this to make extra money. But I would not recommend my friends do this. I have not had any accidents myself, but if my friends got into a car accident one day and they lost an arm or leg somehow, I'd feel bad.

I won't do this forever; I am saving for my future. Every day, I send my mother 250 yuan ($39); she's saving it for me. I keep the remaining 50 yuan ($8) for food. My goal is to save enough for a down payment on a Honda Accord; I'm not far from it. Once I hit my savings goal, I'll quit delivering and return home. As much as I love Xiamen, I know I won't be able to settle down in this city as just a rider.

Protocol | China

Beijing meets an unstoppable force: Chinese parents and their children

Live-in tutors disguised as nannies, weekday online tutoring classes and adult gaming accounts for rent. Here's how citizens are finding ways to skirt Beijing's diktats.

Citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies.

Photo: Liu Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images

During the summer break, Beijing handed down a parade of new regulations designed to intervene in youth education and entertainment, including a strike against private tutoring, a campaign to "cleanse" the internet and a strict limit on online game playing time for children. But so far, these seemingly iron-clad rules have met their match, with students and their parents quickly finding workarounds.

Grassroots citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies. Authorities then have to play defense, amending holes in their initial rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.


Keep Reading Show less
Nasdaq
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Policy

Google and Microsoft are at it again, now over government software

The on-again, off-again battle between the two companies flared up again when Google commissioned a study on how much the U.S. government relies on Microsoft software.

Google and Microsoft are in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Photo: Jens Tandler/EyeEm/Getty Images

According to a new report commissioned by Google, Microsoft has an overwhelming "share in the U.S. government office productivity software market," potentially leading to security risks for local, state and federal governments.

The five-page document, released Tuesday by a trade group that counts Google as a member, represents the latest escalation between the two companies in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

People

Facebook wants to kill the family iPad

Facebook has built the first portable smart display, and is introducing a new household mode that makes it easier to separate work from play.

Facebook's new Portal Go device will go on sale for $199 in October.

Photo: Facebook

Facebook is coming for the coffee table tablet: The company on Tuesday introduced a new portable version of its smart display called Portal Go, which promises to be a better communal device for video calls, media consumption and many of the other things families use iPads for.

Facebook also announced a revamped version of its Portal Pro device Tuesday, and introduced a new household mode to Portals that will make it easier to share these devices with everyone in a home without having to compromise on working-from-home habits. Taken together, these announcements show that there may be an opening for consumer electronics companies to meet this late-pandemic moment with new device categories.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

The techlash is threatening human rights around the world

Some 48 countries introduced laws to regulate tech last year. But researchers say many of those laws are just attempts at censorship and surveillance.

In its latest report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said, "We really see free expression and privacy as under unprecedented strain."

Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Governments around the world are seizing on widespread frustrations with Big Tech as justification for a spate of increasingly restrictive laws governing online speech, a new report finds, a trend that researchers say puts both free expression and the fate of tech companies' overseas employees at risk.

Over the last year alone, some 48 countries worldwide introduced — and in some cases, passed — laws to regulate tech companies, according to the latest report by Freedom House, a nonprofit that publishes an annual survey on internet freedoms in 70 countries. While those laws have often been passed in the name of promoting competition, protecting people's data and moderating offensive content, the report's authors say that, in many cases, these laws are merely thinly veiled attempts to force companies into censorship and surveillance.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories