Is China’s new limit on video games a big deal for its gaming sector?

Not really.

A group of young people in masks playing video games.

In-game spending from Chinese gamers under 18 only captures a fraction of gaming companies' revenue.

Photo: Bertha Wang/AFP via Getty Images

Seemingly every piece of internet regulation the Chinese government has come out with in recent months has become an international headliner. Beijing's recent move to dramatically cut down the amount of time for children to play online games has done the same, and even inspired American parents to institute stricter screen-time control at home. But analysts say the immediate impact is minimal.

On the last day of summer break in China, the country's National Press and Publication Administration declared that those under 18 will only be allowed to play games up to three hours a week — specifically, between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. China's ultra-strict limits on video games came after the recent revisions to the Minors Protection Law went into effect in June, and they synchronize with other rules aimed at preventing Chinese youth internet addiction.

It's all bad news for kids, at least in their eyes. But Chinese gaming powerhouses probably won't miss their underage players a great deal. The new limits aim primarily at free-to-play mobile games whose monetization strategies are based mostly on in-game microtransactions. But in-game spending by players under 18 only comprises a tiny fraction of gaming company revenue in China.

Tencent, the world's largest gaming company by revenue, has revealed in its earnings reports that during the second quarter of 2021, gamers under age 16 contributed just 2.6% to Tencent's in-game revenue (down from 3.2% in Q4 2020), and players under 12 accounted for just 0.3%. NetEase, China's second-largest gaming company, sees less than 1% of its revenue from gamers under 18, CEO and founder William Ding revealed in the company's quarterly earnings call on Tuesday. Across the market, spending by underage gamers only makes up between 1% and 5% of Chinese gaming companies' in-game purchases, according to Daniel Ahmad, senior analyst at Niko Partners, a gaming consultancy focused on Asia.

"They will not have much impact to these companies' ongoing strategy and goals," Daniel Camilo, formerly a business developer for Shenzhen-based game publisher APPTUTTi, told Protocol.

Investors have shrugged off the potential impact of Beijing's new restrictions, evident in the quick rebound of share prices of Tencent and NetEase following the announcement of the new policy. If anything, a rigid rule like this — specifying the exact time slots allowed for minors to play games — precludes gaming companies from going to the trouble of self-regulation based on political speculation, something big tech companies often have to do these days. "Gaming companies now have a clear idea about how to comply going forward," Chundi Zhang, gaming analyst at the London-based research firm Ampere Analysis, told Protocol.

The reason why the share of spending from minors is so small is that China's gaming regulators have been trying since as early as 2005 to get rid of what they believe is the scourge of gaming addiction among minors. In 2019, China's National Press and Publication Administration introduced regulations that already significantly limited the amount of time that gamers under 18 could engage with games.

Though the financial impact from the 2021 time limits on video games is soft, they will likely further diminish the in-game spending from underage players — and gaming companies will likely see engagement numbers dip. China is home to the world's largest gamer population. Official government data shows that 62.5% of minors who have access to the internet, or about 114 million young gamers, often play online. "Even if a game only profits through advertising, the new rule will still affect them," Zhang said. "So the drop of daily or monthly active users will have a direct impact on their advertising revenue."

In the long term, the new time limits for young gamers could affect the future growth of China's gaming industry. When the now-affected young gamers turn 18, their earlier lack of engagement could affect whether they see gaming as a hobby to engage with, and whether they will be able to play complex games that are popular among gamers by then.

But kids being kids, they will ultimately find loopholes to bypass the rules, analysts say. For example, younger parents, who themselves have been gaming for the past 20 years, may let children use their parents' accounts to play games. After all, gaming's not just for kids; China has a $43 billion video games market. It's home to 720 million gamers, almost half its total population. Nine in 10 people ages 25 to 35 play video games in China.

"We're not too concerned about gaming being shut off or just being inaccessible to people once they turn 18 or not being something that they want to engage with," Ahmad said. "The overall trend of China being the largest games market is not really changing."

More uncertain at this point is China's future esports landscape. The new time limit for underage gamers directly undermines the country's stated long-term goal of becoming an esports powerhouse. Many professional esports players and those in the pipeline are under 18. Three hours per week for training would be far from sufficient to prepare for international competitions. Chinese news media reported that esports clubs have been hit hard by Beijing's new rule, and have already stopped underage players from entering professional competitions.

China is the world's largest esports market, registering $15.5 billion in sales in 2020. At the same time that Beijing is trying to eradicate gaming addiction by regulating the content and monetization of video games, national and local governments are also putting forward policies to expand the esports market. Shanghai, for example, is supporting the construction of a $898 million esports arena. And Beijing's municipal government is doling out millions of dollars' worth of subsidies to esports tournaments and teams.

It's unclear now whether future rules will carve out additional time for young esports players to train. But the current state will present a challenge for esports organizations trying to develop talent, and it will be difficult for them to attract players in the future. "Ultimately, the pool will still be very large, so they'll still be able to find players that they can bring on," Ahmad said. "It will just be a smaller pool than before."

Correction, Sept. 3, 2021: In-game spending comprises a tiny fraction of revenue among players under 18 years old.

A visitor plays a game using Microsoft's Xbox controller at a flagship store of SK Telecom in Seoul on November 10, 2020. (Photo by Jung Yeon-je / AFP) (Photo by JUNG YEON-JE/AFP via Getty Images)

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Nick Statt joins the show to discuss Microsoft’s $68.7 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, and what it means for the tech and game industries. Then, Issie Lapowsky talks about a big week in antitrust reform, and whether real progress is being made in the U.S. Finally, Hirsh Chitkara explains why AT&T, Verizon, the FAA and airlines have been fighting for months about 5G coverage.

For more on the topics in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

Congress’ antitrust push has a hate speech problem

Sen. Klobuchar’s antitrust bill is supposed to promote competition. So why are advocates afraid it could also promote extremists?

The bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Photo: Photo by Elizabeth Frantz-Pool/Getty Images

The antitrust bill that passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday and is now headed to the Senate floor is, at its core, an attempt to prevent the likes of Apple, Amazon and Google from boosting their own products and services on the marketplaces and platforms they own.

But upon closer inspection, some experts say, the bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Ask a tech worker: How many of your colleagues have caught omicron?

Millions of workers called in sick in recent weeks. How is tech handling it?

A record number of Americans called in sick with COVID-19 in recent weeks. Even with high vaccination rates, tech companies aren’t immune.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker! For this recurring feature, I’ve been roaming downtown San Francisco at lunchtime to ask tech employees about how the workplace is changing. This week, I caught up with tech workers about what their companies are doing to avoid omicron outbreaks, and whether many of their colleagues had been out sick lately. Got an idea for a future topic? Email me.

Omicron stops for no one, it seems. Between Dec. 29 and Jan. 10, 8.8 million Americans missed work to either recover from COVID-19 or care for someone who was recovering, according to the Census Bureau. That number crushed the previous record of 6.6 million from last January, and tripled the numbers from early last month.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

The fast-growing paychecks of Big Tech’s biggest names

Tech giants had a huge pandemic, and their execs are getting paid.

TIm Cook received $82 million in stock awards on top of his $3 million salary as Apple's CEO.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

Tech leaders are making more than ever.

As tech giants thrive amid the pandemic, companies like Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft have continued to pay their leaders accordingly: Big Tech CEO pay is higher than ever. In the coming months, we’ll begin seeing a lot of companies release their executive compensation from the past year as fiscal 2022 begins.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht
Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.
Latest Stories