Protocol | China

Meet China's tiny, adorable Tesla-slayer

The beloved "people's car" from Wuling is cute, cheap and outsells the Model 3 globally. Why won't the Chinese government give it more love?

Wuling Hongguang Mini electric vehicle

Wuling Hongguang Mini electric vehicles, manufactured by SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co.

Photo: Zhe Ji/Getty Images

The Wuling Hongguang Mini EV is a homegrown tiny car that has risen to Chinese social media stardom through a rebranding effort worthy of a business school textbook. It's not just China's best-selling EV; it's also a meme.

For each month following its July 2020 release, Wuling's Mini EV has consistently been the top-selling electric vehicle model in China. In January 2021, it dethroned Tesla's Model 3 as the worldwide best seller, according to the EV industry observer José Pontes. In a later post, Pontes described Wuling as "a disruptive force in urban mobility" and "a true EV for the masses."

By pricing at a fraction of the cost of Tesla and meme-ifying the brand's decades-long popularity as an affordable vehicle maker, Wuling has transformed its image among China's youth from a tacky business vehicle to a cool, economic option for a first car.

But that future is not guaranteed. Tiny cars aren't exactly what China's government wants to show the world when it comes to showcasing their automobile manufacturing. The city of Shanghai is planning for a move to push EV makers to sell more high-end models, and Wuling might be taking the hit. With favorable policies fading away, Wuling's future is uncertain.

Wuling, the memelord

It didn't start with EV. Wuling, a joint venture between General Motors and two long-standing Chinese car makers, has always been in the media spotlight. In May 2010, Forbes Magazine put a Wuling minivan on its cover and called it "the most important car on earth," referring to its globe-leading sales numbers.

Wuling vehicles — mostly minivans — are designed to be affordable, versatile and easy to engineer for specialized uses. In an era when the majority of Chinese people couldn't pay much for cars, Wuling's were the favorite pick among small business owners and farmers who needed a vehicle for both personal and business uses. And because the cars only cost around $5,000 new, owners have less concern using them for heavy-duty work.

At the time of the Forbes cover, 2 million Wuling Zhiguang were running down China's streets. That same year, the company released Wuling Hongguang, an even more popular minivan that would continue to sell hundreds of thousands each year.

Wuling's ubiquity easily translated into social media virality. People started calling Wuling Hongguang "the people's supercar" (国民神车). The brand is so down-to-earth that it has turned cool again. In 2017, luxury car owners around the country started replacing their BMW or Ferrari logos with fake Wuling Hongguang ones just for a quick laugh.

Yet since 2017, Wuling's sales numbers and net profit have been steadily declining. The company has tried different ways to rebrand or diversify its products, but it hasn't seemed to help much. So, when Wuling joined the crowded EV manufacturing race in 2020, the public's expectations and doubts were equally high.

Wuling delivered. The Hongguang Mini EV, looking like a more chiseled Volkswagen Beetle, has kept its traditional appeal. It's priced between $4,500 and $7,000, about one-ninth of what the Tesla's cheapest Model 3 costs in China. Buyers can charge their Wuling at home instead of going to a special charging station. It has sacrificed many functions for the low cost: the cheapest model of Wuling Mini EV doesn't even have an air conditioner, and no model has airbags. But it stayed consistent to its brand image as the "people's car."

And the company knows how to win the hearts of young car buyers, who probably recognize Wuling more for its memes than for its practical value. It released cars in bright, macaron colors and encouraged users to individualize their cars. Across lifestyle sharing platform Xiaohongshu, young buyers have posted photo essays showing how they transformed their Wuling Mini EVs using unorthodox colors, retro decorations and anime stickers. Doing so is sufficiently popular that it's become hard to tell which photos are paid sponsorship and which are spontaneous acts of love.

The numbers suggest Wuling's gamble has paid off. It's selling tens of thousands of this Mini EV each month, more than any other EV model. Over half of Wuling Mini EV's buyers are younger than 30 and over 60% of buyers are women, according to the company.

The flip side of Wuling's low prices is low revenue, at least for now. When parent company Shanghai SAIC Motor released its financials of 2020, it said Wuling's net profit of 2020 shrank 90% compared to 2019, even though that was the year Wuling's Mini EV was supposed to have saved the brand. But the Gen Z love is real, and a textbook example of a successful rebranding.

An industry diverging

China's EV industry has come a long way. From 2010 to 2016, the central government subsidized almost every electric or hybrid vehicle purchase by as much as $10,000; the subsidy amount dwindled after 2016, and many cars, from hybrid vehicles to small-sized ones, were eliminated from the qualified categories. But the policy has achieved its desired effect. Today, not only is every car maker releasing electricity-powered models, but many tech companies are becoming EV companies too. This March, EV sales accounted for over 10% of total auto sales in China for the first time.

Wuling's rise represents one of two diverging trends in the industry. On one hand, high-end cars like Tesla are doing great. Much like in the United States, Tesla ownership is a status symbol.

On the other hand, tiny, cheap cars have found their own markets too. People choose Wuling's Mini EV for their daily commute, not road trips. In fact, prices can go even lower than Wuling if a buyer is willing to accept a tiny, off-brand vehicle that is essentially an electric bike sheathed within a car-like exterior. They dominate China's roads and are especially popular among seniors.

Cheap cars like Wuling have another benefit. In megacities like Shanghai, where license plates are rationed to control traffic congestion, a license plate for a traditional car can cost an average of $14,000. But because these cities are encouraging the purchases of EVs, an EV buyer can get a new license plate for free. Some buy a tiny EV like Wuling's for the sole purpose of getting a new plate.

But the number of electric cars is growing so fast that these policies may come to an end soon. Beijing has already imposed license plate limits on EVs. Shanghai, where 125,460 "new energy cars" were sold last year, is thinking of following suit. Starting in early May, Wuling Mini EV buyers in Shanghai were told they could not register for a new license plate. The rumor, as reported by National Business Daily, is that all EVs shorter than 15 feet and cheaper than $15,666 will soon be disqualified from new plates in China's financial capital.

The majority of Wuling's sales take place in second- or third-tier Chinese cities, so that policy's effect on the company will be limited. But it signals a broader trend toward stricter regulations and less incentives for the growing EV industry.

It also hints at China's bigger problem: the country wants to upgrade its EV industry and gain global market share. An affordable but technically unsophisticated car isn't the kind of success story Beijing wants to tell, even if that car is hip enough to outsell Tesla. While the new rules in Shanghai have not been made public yet, it suggests that authorities are favoring cars that are bigger and more expensive, effectively encouraging car makers to go in that direction.

Protocol | China

Beijing meets an unstoppable force: Chinese parents and their children

Live-in tutors disguised as nannies, weekday online tutoring classes and adult gaming accounts for rent. Here's how citizens are finding ways to skirt Beijing's diktats.

Citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies.

Photo: Liu Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images

During the summer break, Beijing handed down a parade of new regulations designed to intervene in youth education and entertainment, including a strike against private tutoring, a campaign to "cleanse" the internet and a strict limit on online game playing time for children. But so far, these seemingly iron-clad rules have met their match, with students and their parents quickly finding workarounds.

Grassroots citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies. Authorities then have to play defense, amending holes in their initial rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Policy

Google and Microsoft are at it again, now over government software

The on-again, off-again battle between the two companies flared up again when Google commissioned a study on how much the U.S. government relies on Microsoft software.

Google and Microsoft are in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Photo: Jens Tandler/EyeEm/Getty Images

According to a new report commissioned by Google, Microsoft has an overwhelming "share in the U.S. government office productivity software market," potentially leading to security risks for local, state and federal governments.

The five-page document, released Tuesday by a trade group that counts Google as a member, represents the latest escalation between the two companies in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Facebook wants to kill the family iPad

Facebook has built the first portable smart display, and is introducing a new household mode that makes it easier to separate work from play.

Facebook's new Portal Go device will go on sale for $199 in October.

Photo: Facebook

Facebook is coming for the coffee table tablet: The company on Tuesday introduced a new portable version of its smart display called Portal Go, which promises to be a better communal device for video calls, media consumption and many of the other things families use iPads for.

Facebook also announced a revamped version of its Portal Pro device Tuesday, and introduced a new household mode to Portals that will make it easier to share these devices with everyone in a home without having to compromise on working-from-home habits. Taken together, these announcements show that there may be an opening for consumer electronics companies to meet this late-pandemic moment with new device categories.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

The techlash is threatening human rights around the world

Some 48 countries introduced laws to regulate tech last year. But researchers say many of those laws are just attempts at censorship and surveillance.

In its latest report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said, "We really see free expression and privacy as under unprecedented strain."

Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Governments around the world are seizing on widespread frustrations with Big Tech as justification for a spate of increasingly restrictive laws governing online speech, a new report finds, a trend that researchers say puts both free expression and the fate of tech companies' overseas employees at risk.

Over the last year alone, some 48 countries worldwide introduced — and in some cases, passed — laws to regulate tech companies, according to the latest report by Freedom House, a nonprofit that publishes an annual survey on internet freedoms in 70 countries. While those laws have often been passed in the name of promoting competition, protecting people's data and moderating offensive content, the report's authors say that, in many cases, these laws are merely thinly veiled attempts to force companies into censorship and surveillance.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories