Weibo is muzzling users for discussing a landmark #MeToo case

A number of accounts have been suspended, even deleted, after voicing support for the plaintiff.

Weibo is muzzling users for discussing a landmark #MeToo case
Photo: Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

As a Beijing court dismissed China's landmark sexual harassment case on Tuesday, Weibo censors acted to muzzle a number of accounts that voiced support for the accuser, or even simply discussed the trial beforehand.

In 2018, the plaintiff Zhou Xiaoxuan, better known by the nickname Xianzi, filed a high-profile #MeToo case against Zhu Jun, a renowned state broadcast show host. Zhou claimed that Zhu sexually harassed her while she was an intern on Zhu's show in 2014. Chinese web users have closely followed the civil suit, which has also drawn international media attention.

The Tuesday trial was closed to outside observers, and tech companies like Weibo are now actively blocking public discussions of the court ruling. Shortly after the trial, Weibo users (including this author) started receiving messages from platform administrators that notified them of account suspensions due to recent posts that "violated relevant national laws and regulations," which is the language most frequently used to identify politically disfavored online speech. The suspension windows range between seven days and 30 days. During their suspensions, users cannot comment or share. Some users with large followings even saw their accounts deleted for good.

The attempts to erase the footprints of Xianzi's case didn't stop there. According to the China Digital Times, a U.S.-based nonprofit that tracks Chinese censorship, a directive came down from China's internet regulators ordering an unidentified website to ban coverage of the case as well as to filter all content that mentions the court ruling.

The Beijing Haidian People's Court, in a statement posted late Tuesday on Weibo, cited a lack of evidence to support its dismissal of Xianzi's sexual misconduct allegation. But Xianzi tried to offer a counter-narrative, claiming the court refused to admit some evidence, including surveillance footage outside the room where the alleged incident happened. Those posts, which appeared via third-party accounts — Xianzi was barred from posting to her 340,000 Weibo followers for a year starting in July — were also quickly censored.

The censorship initiative went wide and deep. One Weibo user wrote in a post that at least 20 of their Weibo friends who shared posts about the Tuesday trial had been muzzled; they had only a few dozen friends on Weibo.

"Today's Weibo looks like a graveyard," one user posted on Tuesday, adding their feed was "full of posts about friends whose accounts were suspended, deleted or who are 'reborn' with new accounts."

"Not everyone will remember the past, but some will," the user continued. "And these people will not give up just because they are muzzled."

The latest wave of account suspensions and deletions is just an extension of Weibo's ongoing tightening of its grip on users, numbering nearly 566 million. As Chinese authorities have ramped up a crackdown on freedom of speech in the past five years, account deletion, one of the more severe penalties, has become increasingly common. In April alone, Weibo deleted over a dozen accounts that belonged to feminist activists after ultranationalists launched hate campaigns against the women. Weibo, a Nasdaq-listed company, didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment. In an attempt to remedy what the Party sees as toxic celebrity and fan cultures, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), China's cyberspace watchdog and central internet censor, earlier this summer launched a campaign to "cleanse" the internet, including erasing from the web the presence of several pop stars whose actions weren't in line with Party ideology.

More censorship coming

Restrictions on freedom of online expression in China will likely continue to proliferate as cyberspace authorities hand down more internet regulations. Coincidentally, on the day of the sexual-misconduct court hearing, the Central Committee General Office and the State Council General Office released a set of new policy guidelines that called for "strengthening online civilization construction." Of the eight sections, one mandates further standardization of "online content production, information release and the dissemination process," and the building of a national mechanism debunking disinformation based on the existing national Internet Rumor-Refuting Platform.

On Wednesday, a day after the court ruling, the CAC rolled out another set of policy guidelines to step up its control over online expression. The policy document aims to reinforce tech companies' responsibility to moderate content. It mandates firms tighten user supervision, especially certain accounts that "require attention," and establish a database of "blacklisted accounts." The new rules also require social media platforms to prevent the so-called "reincarnation of illegal and irregular accounts." This means that social media users who get kicked off from Weibo can no longer get back on by creating a new account. Companies are also required to beef up in-house content moderation staff in order to improve their censorship system and "further expand the scope" of content moderation.

In August, the CAC released draft regulations to limit tech companies' usage of algorithmic recommendations. The draft rules require companies to build mechanisms that allow humans to manually curate popular search terms, trending topic charts and pop-up windows to "vigorously present information content that conforms to mainstream values."

The treatment of this latest phase of Xianzi's #MeToo case is a departure from, and likely response to, the viral nature of its opening. Last December, when a Beijing court first heard Xianzi's civil suit against Zhu, hundreds of people gathered outside in support of the plaintiff. Live videos and photos circulated widely on Chinese social media as the hearing was in session, and at one point "Xianzi" topped Weibo's trending chart. By contrast, this week, the crowd was far smaller, and one participant said authorities blocked cellular signals outside the court to prevent supporters from communicating via social media. With this censorship operation in full swing, "Xianzi" has not appeared anywhere on Weibo's trending chart. Instead, the top item on the chart on Wednesday was Beijing's new policy guidelines calling for "strengthening online civilization construction."

But these moves haven't deterred web users who have been vocally supporting Xianzi. "Eyes that are open cannot pretend that they can't see what's going on," wrote another Weibo user. "This fight continues, and we will each do our part."


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories