DiDi’s delisting is China’s new normal

DiDi may be a guinea pig in a transition to tougher data security oversight.

DiDi logo

Some experts believe DiDi will be forced to restructure its company to address cybersecurity concerns, including adding a government stakeholder.

Image: DiDi

Chinese ride-sharing giant DiDi has been caught in Chinese regulators’ crosshairs since it launched its starcrossed $4.4 billion U.S. IPO in June. DiDi finally announced last Friday its plans to delist from the New York Stock Exchange and relist in Hong Kong. The company’s departure from the U.S. could make it the test case in a transition to a tougher data security oversight regime that could shape how Chinese tech giants conduct their businesses in the future.

Though DiDi didn’t specify the reason for its delisting, tech analysts widely believe the company was under immense political pressure to withdraw its U.S. offering, which, the public learned in retrospect, never received a full green light from Beijing. Just two days after DiDi executives rang the bell at the New York Stock Exchange, on July 2, China’s powerful cyberspace watchdog launched a cybersecurity probe into the company’s data infrastructure.

Since then, DiDi has heightened regulatory concerns and catalyzed public discussion about two areas in which both Beijing and Washington have taken a keen interest: cybersecurity and Chinese tech firms’ U.S. listings.

“DiDi might not be driving trends by setting precedent, but rather it might be a guinea pig in a bigger transition,” Graham Webster, a research scholar and editor in chief of the DigiChina Project at Stanford University, told Protocol.

Beijing passed the Data Security Law and the Personal Information Protection Law this year to rein in tech companies and restrict data transfer to foreign countries. Beijing also reportedly plans to ban domestic companies handling sensitive data from listing abroad through so-called variable interest entities (VIEs), which DiDi and most other tech heavyweights used for the past two decades to bypass foreign investment restrictions on overseas listings.

Meanwhile, DiDi is caught in a years-long auditing deadlock between Beijing and Washington. The SEC last week finalized revised rules that can now allow the American regulator to force all Chinese companies to delist from American exchanges if they don't comply with U.S. auditing requirements. And the U.S. securities regulator is also looking to clamp down on Chinese VIEs.

“In the grand scheme of things, this development will [have] a chilling effect on the market and a damper on the animal spirits of the domestic platform industry,” Xiaomeng Lu, a director in Eurasia Group's geo-technology practice, told Protocol. “Entrepreneurs would be very hesitant to ruffle the feathers of regulators for a while.”

A chilling effect

The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC)’s investigation into DiDi’s data infrastructure is still ongoing, long past the date by which the regulator said it would reach a conclusion. Analysts at political risk consultancy Eurasia Group believe the CAC has possibly reached “a key milestone” in its probe into DiDi, and might have pushed DiDi to delist from the U.S. behind the scene. So DiDi is hitching itself to Hong Kong, which the mobility company once shunned because of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s more stringent listing requirements.

DiDi’s plight, against the backdrop of new regulatory moves in both China and the U.S., will likely prompt other Chinese tech firms to wind down their U.S. listings. And Chinese tech unicorns will raise funds through other channels, including going public in Hong Kong.

Cybersecurity reviews will be another part of the new normal for Chinese tech unicorns. Not only is DiDi itself subject to a prolonged cybersecurity review, but its defiant IPO — in Beijing’s eyes — has also provoked the CAC to establish a cybersecurity review regime this past summer, now likely to be applicable to Hong Kong listings.

“Didi's case definitely made one thing clear for Chinese tech companies, if it wasn't clear already: If you've got lots of user data you're going to be more tightly regulated — and that goes doubly for your overseas activity,” said Taylor Loeb, an analyst at Trivium China, a China policy research group.

What’s next?

Now that DiDi has ticked off Chinese authorities and will have to withdraw its New York listing, analysts at Eurasia Group believe that DiDi will be forced to restructure the company to address the Chinese government’s data security and national security concerns, following the steps of Ant Group, another tech unicorn that has fallen from Beijing’s grace and has agreed to share its troves of consumer data with a state-backed credit-scoring agency.

One possible outcome of the cybersecurity review is to introduce state shareholders to DiDi’s governance structure. “Didi will end up in a worse place than Ant [Group] on the restructuring front,” Lu of Eurasia Group told Protocol.

Lu believes DiDi’s cybersecurity review outcomes could set precedent for other Chinese tech unicorns, which could allow regulators to tighten their grip over Chinese tech companies seeking to list overseas. A partial state partnership “would open a new front of China's ongoing rectification campaign, expanding on existing effort in the areas of fintech regulation, antitrust reform, content policing, algorithm supervision and labor condition improvement,” Lu and other Eurasia analysts wrote in a report.

A few Chinese tech companies have already introduced state shareholders into their corporate governance. For example, back in August, a state-backed company, Wangtouzhongwen Technology, bought a 1% stake in TikTok’s parent company ByteDance. Wangtouzhongwen Technology is owned by several state-backed entities, including a fund backed by the CAC.

To be sure, analysts are reluctant to extrapolate too much from DiDi’s fiasco, noting that DiDi’s situation is unique. “The regulatory assault on DiDi stands apart from the general industry situation because the company was perceived as brazenly defying the government,” Webster said. “There’s a broader effort to exert control over data-intensive industries, but to assess it one should look at companies that have not just especially ticked off the government, such as DiDi or Ant Financial.”


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories