Who should be scared of China’s big, bad digital yuan?

Hint: It's the payment platforms, not their users.

Close-up of Mao Zedong's portrait on 5 Yuan RMB,10 Yuan RMB,100 Yuan RMB (China Currency).

The implementation of e-CNY has some concerned about security and surveillance.

Image: hudiemm/Getty Images

Every step China takes with its centrally-backed digital currency — the e-CNY, also known as digital yuan or the Digital Currency Electronic Payment project — is closely watched. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what some fear the Chinese government will do to the e-CNY's users.

Last Monday, three U.S. Republican senators called for a ban on American athletes using e-CNY during the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing. They say they are concerned with how the currency can be used as a tool to surveil its users.

It sounds scary, but it's probably not as significant as the senators make it sound.

With the recent release of a digital yuan white paper by People's Bank of China, named "Progress of Research & Development of E-CNY in China," observers are finally getting some long-anticipated details on the project. Protocol talked to several e-CNY researchers about what the document tells us, especially who should really be concerned about the new digital currency. The skinny: It's private payment companies, not individual users, who should worry most about their data being snatched by the state.

How anonymous is it, really?

From the very beginning, the PBOC has emphasized that the e-CNY will enable a certain level of anonymity to simulate the experience of using physical cash, a concept they call "controllable anonymity" (可控匿名).

In June, Mu Changchun, director-general of the Digital Currency Institute at the PBOC, said publicly that it will be possible for users to set up an anonymous account as long as their deposits do not exceed 10,000 RMB (or $1,540). The only thing needed will be a valid phone number.

In reality, the system is likely more "pseudonymous" than anonymous, Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told Protocol. It's not like cash or the prepaid debit card people can buy anonymously at a local convenience store. Instead, every digital yuan wallet, physical or virtual, will be associated with a valid phone number. That means any e-CNY transaction will be traceable back to a number, which in China is tied to an individual via their ID.

Mu, the director-general, has said that telecom companies cannot provide identity data to institutions like the central bank. But telecoms are still legally obliged to surrender any data to police or court requests in China.

Theoretically, this means the government will have more insight into individual transactions if they happen in the form of e-CNY instead of cash. This has raised surveillance concerns from outside observers, including from Jerome Powell, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, who said, "It's one that really allows the government to see every payment for which it is used in real time."

But that worry can be overblown, researchers told Protocol, since the e-CNY doesn't give the Chinese government much more power to surveil financial activities than it already enjoys. Records of financial activities, whether via the popular payment platforms Alipay and WeChat or via commercial bank-issued credit cards, can also be seized by the government if it wishes.

From the individual user's perspective, they can still opt for cash if they want to keep a transaction secret, since physical cash is guaranteed to co-exist with its digital alternative for a long time to come.

"It's very scary in general, but if you consider how surveilled financial transactions already are in China, I just think it's not significantly more scary," said Chorzempa.

Data as an asset

Instead of fixating on individual activities, the Chinese government is probably more interested in obtaining the troves of aggregated transaction data that a centrally-backed digital currency will generate.

"Setting this up for data is probably the No. 1 [argument for deployment]," said Zennon Kapron, founder of Kapronasia, a Singapore-based fintech consulting service. "When you look at the amount of work that the government puts into setting monetary policies, financial policies [and] capital controls, [the data] just make it much easier."

The white paper has confirmed that the PBOC has "set up a framework for big data analysis, risk monitoring and early warning for the e-CNY." Once the digital yuan is used widely across the nation, it has the potential to generate a massive amount of data that can be useful for financial regulators. They could, for example, monitor how money flows from region to region, analyze consumption activities or detect system risks earlier than they could have otherwise.

The state won't just collect data; it will undercut private companies' ability to do the same. Authorities claim that "the e-CNY system collects less transaction information than traditional electronic payment systems and does not provide information to third parties or other government agencies unless stipulated otherwise in laws and regulations."

This means if someone is using an e-CNY wallet to pay on the Alibaba-owned Alipay app, the digital yuan system will shield some data from Alibaba, like what product the payment is for, or who receives the money.

It's no secret that China's modern-day tech giants rely on massive consumer data to generate insights and income. A user's spending habits on Alipay or WeChat could feed information to the system to determine the targeted ad they receive or the maximum loans they can get. Losing the ability to tailor ads and loans will be a major blow to domestic fintech companies.

But the move fits well with the kind of data security regime China is trying to become: one in which presumptively untrustworthy private companies face strict limits on what they can do with user data, while the presumptively trustworthy state does not. Recent regulations on personal data have drawn up strict rules, comparable to or even beyond Europe's GDPR, when it comes to what private companies can or cannot do with customer data. That part is celebrated by most observers as a move in the right direction. But the state, which can easily leverage state security concerns to collect personal data as it pleases, remains unchecked.

It doesn't mean private tech companies will now get no data at all: Currently, the standalone e-CNY app is not publicly available. To make a payment with digital yuan, users need to open a digital yuan wallet in one of the existing apps, be it Alipay, WeChat or those from commercial banks. That means these payment platforms will still know something about the user even if they are blocked from knowing the entirety of the transaction.

"Obviously [the platforms] would prefer to have more visibility into the data, but if they are only limited to the level 1 data [a category that only includes the amount, date and basic retailer information] that still gives you a lot of information about the individual," which then can be used to provide products and services, said Kapron.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories