Does AI need EQ?

The CEO of Chinese company Xiaoice thinks emotion and opinion are the future of artificial intelligence.

Does AI need EQ?

Li Di, Xiaoice's CEO.

Photo provided by Xiaoice

Hey, Siri and Alexa: Your Chinese competitors are developing something you don't have. Opinions.

Xiaoice, a Chinese chatbot developed by Microsoft in 2014, is different from other AI assistants. Its makers imbued it with a distinct personality: an 18-year-old girl who can sing, dance, write poetry and paint. The team behind Xiaoice has often said it's an AI with emotional intelligence.

But since becoming independent from Microsoft in July 2020, the company, also called Xiaoice, is aiming at much more than that. With Xiaoice integrated in almost all Chinese-brand smartphones, the company is training its algorithms on data from 758 million online users. Its AI framework has enabled users to create over 6 million "virtual boyfriends/girlfriends" — customized "AI beings" that can have completely different personalities from the original Xiaoice. The company also said its annual revenue had exceeded $15 million, mostly from Xiaoice's enterprise products, like in-car assistants and financial news-gathering services.

In an interview with Protocol, Li Di, CEO of Xiaoice and former deputy director of Microsoft's Search Technology Center Asia, talked about why it's important for AI beings to have opinions, what advantages Chinese companies enjoy relative to American peers and why he doesn't think government should regulate his industry.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Xiaoice was developed mainly in China. What advantages do Chinese AI companies have that their American counterparts don't?

Chinese companies are really good at finding new business models and operating models. That's because China has a great [market]. It's got depth — from top-tier cities to sixth-tier cities, there are vertical differences between these scenarios. It also has a large sheer volume [of people]. So usually, as long as you are going in the right direction and going fast enough, it's not hard to find a business model that works well.

But sometimes, because it's so easy, you don't have enough motivation to keep innovating. Why do I need to be original? Why don't I just get on the streets and ask everyone to sign up for our services? Xiaoice is a Chinese company now, but in this sense we are still keeping our old culture. We want to do original things.

Xiaoice is operating in overseas markets as well, like in Indonesia and Japan. Has Xiaoice ever felt any geopolitical pressure?

Not really. We have good relationships with the markets we are in. For the concerns about data security, it doesn't only happen between China and the United States. China and Japan also have different views on that. But it's not a problem for us because we've been working on localization from the get-go.

Why do you think AI assistants need to have high "emotional intelligence"?

We've always said chatbots need to have EQ, but that's the romantic way of saying it. From the technological perspective, the difference is whether it focuses on handling a fragment of the conversation [like one question], or the whole session of the conversation.

When human beings are interacting with AI beings, they aren't just talking about facts, but also opinions.

What are facts? Facts are when I ask [the chatbot] how tall the Himalayas are, or can you get me a Uber. But when I ask it whether it likes Donald Trump, that's an opinion. Do you like this song by Taylor Swift? That's also an opinion. An AI being has to have opinions. It can't both like and dislike it.

Opinions about a Taylor Swift song probably won't impact whether I want to continue talking with the person or not, but for people with strong political beliefs, opinions about, say, Donald Trump can make or break a conversation. What can Xiaoice do if users dislike her opinions?

When you realize this AI being has different opinions from you, you turn around and find another AI being that thinks the same as you. Just like in real life. All these AI beings can be created with this [Xiaoice] framework.

Xiaoice also has many enterprise products now, like news briefs about the financial market or clothing-pattern generators. Isn't there a tension between those non-human services and the personality of Xiaoice?

There's no tension. Enterprise products also need personalities. Yes, it isn't mandatory for providing services, but the more personality, the better.

How do you know Xiaoice won't develop to a point where the technology could go wrong, like in the "Black Mirror" episode where the character made an AI clone of her deceased boyfriend?

We've always had this technology that, with audio materials of several dozen sentences, we can make a voice replicate of you. But we insisted not to make public the access to this technology. Why? Because if you open it up to everyone, one day an AI bot will call your mother and say you were taken away by the police [Editor's note: This is a common type of telephone scam in China.] The only way to reduce the risk is for us to foresee the ethical border of technologies and not go there at all.

Frankly speaking, as AI technologies continue to improve and get increasingly deceptive, I'm not very optimistic about the future. The industry doesn't have enough self-discipline.

Is self-regulation the only solution?

As a private company, that's the only solution, from my perspective. Of course you can call for more regulation, but will more regulation bring about a better result than self-discipline? I'm skeptical about that. Regulations coming from any government or any industry associations tend to be overly restrictive. They tend to tell you not to develop this and not to cause trouble, instead of how you can do it the right way.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories