How China’s quasi-carbon market for electric vehicles works

Tesla and Chinese EV brands are making hundreds of millions of dollars just by selling carbon regulation credits.

A Tesla vehicle.

Tesla and BYD have made hundreds of millions, thanks to a three-year-old quasi-carbon market set up to boost EV industry growth.

Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The end of August marked the end of an annual trading window in China: For the past two months, carmakers have been trading their "New Energy Vehicle" credits in the dark. Leading electric vehicle companies like Tesla and BYD were making hundreds of millions, thanks to a three-year-old quasi-carbon market set up to boost the EV industry's growth.

While the United States just started injecting billions of dollars into its EV industry, China is already ahead of the game, with a "dual-credit" policy that Beijing adapted in 2017 from California state law. Over three years into its existence, the "dual-credit" policy, which punishes the production of fossil fuel cars and rewards the production of EVs, has become one of the most successful policies globally in incentivizing EV production. Some Chinese companies are even selling EVs below cost, as long as the revenue from selling carbon credits can make up for the shortfall.

As China gradually phases out its direct subsidy program and moves to a market-based regulation scheme, this carbon credit market is powering China's ascension in the global automobile industry.

The ever-rising price to purchase a NEV credit

Announced in 2017, the "dual-credit" policy has a somewhat complicated design. There's a Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC) credit, where carmakers gain credits for reducing the average fuel consumption to below a certain level and lose credits for failing to achieve it. There's also a New Energy Vehicle (NEV) credit, where carmakers receive positive credits for each EV produced and negative credits for not producing a specified percentage of EVs in a year.

The criteria were designed so that most traditional carmakers would have a negative total of CAFC credits at the end of the year. To avoid a penalty in the form of a next-year production cap, carmakers had to either make EVs of their own or purchase NEV credits from other companies.

In April, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released the annual credit totals for all automobile companies operating in China, a sort of annual report card for corporate performance. Most prominent firms, like the joint ventures between Volkswagen, General Motors and their Chinese partners, accumulated hundreds of thousands of negative credits. But Tesla, Chinese company BYD and other EV makers amassed a big surplus of NEV credits that they can now sell for profit.

Every year for a few designated months in the summer, these companies are supposed to trade their credits with one other directly. There's no public trading platform, so each participant has to negotiate a price based on their own deal-making abilities. That has motivated most of them to stay silent about the price and the volume of the transactions. "A company may be selling its credits to different companies at different prices. If the prices are made public, the market will be in chaos. So all deals are kept secret," said Tian Yongqiu, an independent auto industry analyst.

But from media reports and numbers released by the government, it's clear that the average price of a NEV credit has changed drastically over the years. It went from about $50 in 2019 to $180 in 2020. While results aren't out yet for 2021, analysts said it had reached nearly $500. Some even speculate that the price could reach $900 per credit next year.

Part of that increase is baked into the design, as the criteria for getting positive credits get harder incrementally every year. "The point of changing the policy every year is to force the price of NEV credits to rise," Zhang Xiang, auto industry analyst at the North China University of Technology, told Protocol. "If credits are too inexpensive, the traditional carmakers won't be incentivized to produce their own EVs."

Before this year, producing an EV typically could earn the company between two and eight credits. That means one EV can equate to thousands of dollars of extra profit in a given year, collectively adding up to a major revenue stream for EV companies.

From the outside, people can only get a hint of how much EV companies are making from selling NEV credits. Tesla disclosed in its 2020 financials that it made $1.6 billion by selling regulatory credits — in China, the United States and Europe combined. (It did not break out its China numbers.) In April, Reuters reported that Tesla has reached a deal with a Volkswagen JV in China to sell NEV credits at $460 each.

NIO, the Chinese hit EV brand recently engulfed in an autopilot-related controversy, earned $18 million in Q4 2020 through selling NEV credits, executives said on an earnings call. Equity analysts from Shenwan Hongyuan wrote that BYD, the Chinese company with the most NEV credits, is on pace to earn at least $200 million from selling credits this year.

There's no reason to believe companies are hoarding their credits for future deals, analyst Tian Yongqiu said. The rules currently dictate that any NEV credit that's left after the trading window will be discounted by half going into the next year.

The larger picture

The effect of China's EV incentive policy is significant. Today, EVs make up over 10% of all automobiles sold in China, while that number is just 2.5% in the United States. This has given China an unprecedented opportunity to assert itself into a market traditionally dominated by the West.

"[China] had no chance to gain traction with traditional cars," Felipe Munoz, senior analyst at market research firm JATO Dynamics, told Protocol, calling EVs "a different story." In this industry, "both the Chinese and the Westerners are equally positioned, and that gives China an advantage."

Particularly, it gave Chinese companies an edge in the affordable end of the market. "Today, China is years ahead the rest of the world in terms of affordable EVs. This can lead them to conquer the emerging markets, as they are the only choice for the population there," said Munoz.

Some side effects

Of course, the policy has its unintended consequences. One common criticism of the "dual-credit" policy is its unsatisfactory impact on fossil fuel-powered cars. The parallel system was supposed to also incentivize carmakers to improve their gasoline engines' efficiency, but because the NEV credits are so much easier to get than CAFC credits, most carmakers haven't bothered to improve their traditional engine models. The fluctuation in NEV credits' price is also a problem, as it could encourage hoarding and speculation.

It also breeds a market where small EVs are designed just for the purpose of gaining NEV credits. Because the credit criterion for EVs is only centered around the driving range — for example, any car with a maximum range of 300km (about 186 miles) is converted into 2.08 credits — companies aren't incentivized to produce EVs that really meet the needs of car buyers rather than cars that can drive long and earn lots of NEV credits.

When Wuling Hongguang EV, China's viral tiny EV, was introduced last year, company executives were clear that the motivation was to generate enough NEV credits so the parent company, a joint venture between General Motors and China's SAIC, could relieve the pressure of having too many negative credits.

"A tiny car and a massive car are no different when it comes to how many credits they contribute [to the company]." Zhu Jun, deputy director of SAIC's passenger car technology center, said in a conference in Nov 2020. Wuling Hongguang's Mini EV, which costs only about $5,000, "would greatly help the company meet its need for credit under the current policy. Otherwise, [we] would have to spend a lot of money purchasing credits."

Successful as it is, the "dual-credit" policy still has a long way to go from an environmental perspective. "The current dual-credit policy only covers passenger vehicles. However, China's medium and heavy-duty commercial vehicles account for 46.9% of road transport greenhouse gas emissions," Chen Zhinan, climate policy fellow at the California-China Climate Institute, told Protocol. Incorporating commercial vehicles into the current system will be an important task going forward.

Replacing gasoline cars with EVs also doesn't necessarily benefit the environment when electricity production in China remains so dependent on burning coal. That might be how this separate, quasi-carbon market of NEV credits can eventually connect to the larger carbon market China started building this year. "In the long term, China could consider assigning credits based on life-cycle emissions instead of on-road emissions only," said Chen.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories