China’s TMZ comes for politics, then censors come for it

Goose Group is the latest victim of Beijing's tightening internet culture regulations.

Kris Wu

Goose Group elevates new stories like sexual assault allegations against Kris Wu.

Photo: VCG/Getty Images

Time stopped on Sept. 23, 3 p.m. in the Goose Group. Since that moment, nothing has been published on the once-roiling Chinese online forum with nearly 700,000 registered members, for years the prime source of news on celebrity gossip and internet trends. On its in-app front page, above the week-old posts that normally would have been displaced by newer ones within seconds, sits a notification in red: "This group is being suspended and reformed for two months as a response to the mandate of Operation Qinglang" — the latest regulatory campaign in China that has cracked down on video games, online fan groups, personal finance influencers and many more aspects of internet culture over the summer.

Nobody outside of Beijing's leadership knows for sure what will happen to Goose Group in two months after Operation Qinglang. But last Thursday, a half-dozen other entertainment gossip groups on Douban were also suspended or disbanded. It's looking increasingly possible that Goose Group will be permanently dissolved, another high-profile victim of Beijing's campaign on internet influencers, one increasingly edging into the cultural sphere.

A place for gossip

At the age of 11, Goose Group has long been a formidable force on the Chinese internet. It's hosted on Douban, a popular social media platform that has been called a mix of "IMDb, Goodreads, Spotify, Pinterest, Medium, Twitter and Reddit." In recent years Goose Group has become home to more than news about mega-celebrity scandals; given how often entertainment gossip seeps into discussions of social issues, Goose has come to offer a raw form of civil organizing. Goose Group members have mobilized several times to protest against sexual assault perpetrators, pedophilic websites and misogynistic anime videos.

The group has tried to stay on the safe side of Beijing's red lines, but has still endured periodic shadowbans (i.e., was hidden from search results), a suspension and a renaming over the past three years.

Douban, the platform that hosts Goose Group, has always attracted an unusual crowd. Its complex product portfolio, including a respected book and movie review system, has resulted in Douban being known for two distinct groups of users: cultural elites and fans of hot gossip. Goose Group is the most popular Douban forum for the latter.

In its early years, Goose Group, originally called something like "here comes the gossip" (八卦来了组), was akin to a user-generated TMZ. It was home to rigorously researched — but also sometimes wildly speculative — gossip. Olivia, a graduate student researcher in Beijing, first started following the group as a college student in 2015. "It was like, someone would write a super detailed thread of the entire history [of a celebrity], and others just had a great time reading and discussing it," Olivia said. (She is using an English name to share her experience freely.)

Olivia couldn't comment or start her own post back then, because Goose Group is every bit as exclusive as it is popular. Non-members can read and like a post, but they can't reply to it or start a new one. Olivia waited about two years between submitting her membership application and getting accepted. Another Goose Group member, surnamed Zhao, started reading the group in 2016 but was finally accepted as a member in May 2020.

"[The admins] would pull up your profile and read it line by line: Whether it looks like a paid account, a bot, or an account that has changed ownership," Zhao told Protocol. Aspiring members often had to join a few smaller gossip groups first and post regularly to convince the Goose Group admins of their authenticity and drive. Because of the persistent rarity of the membership, a Goose Group member account's price on second-hand markets like Taobao or Xianyu soared from $9 in 2016 to $90 in 2018. Owning a membership has become a sort of status symbol — insiders refer to it as "owning a property" — signaling how central one is in the production and circulation of gossip.

The combination of exclusivity and originality made Goose Group one of the best gossip sources among Chinese online platforms. It's become so influential that content farms on other platforms like Weibo can make a living simply by reposting the latest discussions from Goose Group. And the group has continued to prosper even though Douban's overall traffic has declined. At the outset of last month, there were over 179,000 active discussion threads on Goose every week, each getting dozens or even hundreds of replies, according to statistics collected by programmer Allen Ji .

'Pink feminism'

Cute name aside, Goose Group is not for the faint of heart. The conversations, usually centering on celebrities' unappealing sides, often become heated, disorderly and even abusive. After being admitted to the group in 2020, Zhao posted just once, an attempt to interpret a Chinese actress' mental state from one of her bizarre social posts. It didn't go well. "There were probably a few hundred replies, and three-fourths of them were insulting me," Zhao said.

Even though the admins of Goose Group have repeatedly emphasized that the group is only for gossip, its tens of thousands of members inevitably react to current affairs, and some entertainment debates have started to hit close to home.

"Chinese entertainment industry and celebrity culture have also become a battleground for public discussion around social issues like gender inequality, sexual harassment and unlawful accumulation of wealth," Jingyi Gu, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Illinois researching Chinese social media platforms and digital culture, told Protocol.

In February, Goose Group members were enraged by an anime series streaming on the video platform Bilibili that objectified women and featured pedophilic plots. They mobilized to report Bilibili's CEO to a local government body and pressured advertisers to drop deals with Bilibili. And they succeeded in getting the series removed.

The group has also helped elevate many news stories that it collectively deems important. Examples include a famous influencer's involvement in a pedophilia website, the sexual assault case of pop singer Kris Wu and the way a female passenger was inappropriately handled by subway security personnel .

Throughout the years, Goose Group has homed in on a unique ideology, often called "pink feminism." Grassroots "pink feminists" go after individuals and private companies instead of tackling big systematic problems, which researcher Gu calls "probably the only actionable form of feminism in the current Chinese context."

"In the case of Goose Group, since many of the targets of pink feminism's actions are celebrities in the entertainment industry or private corporations like Bilibili, it gives its participants a sense of civic engagement without having to become a political dissident," Gu said.

Here comes the crackdown

Several incidents this year foreshadowed the suspension of Goose Group. Hosts of talent contests, the most popular form of reality TV in China these years, were reprimanded in May, suggesting a widening of Beijing's regulatory interests in the culture sphere. Weibo banned the registration of new accounts with "Goose Group" in their name in the same month and finished clearing out existing ones in September. Two weeks ago, Douban disabled commenting across its website for a week, after pledging to regulate celebrity gossiping groups.

"At that time, you couldn't comment on a post, but you could start a new one. Many people were asking: 'Why are we being treated like this? Aren't we on the same side as the state?'" the group member Zhao recalled.

On Sept. 23, the hammer came down, with Goose Group singled out and suspended for two months. Details have not been published about what's going to change after this round of "reform." Douban didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment.

Operation Qinglang, the policy campaign that caused Goose Group's latest suspension, feels different from those before. Beijing seems more determined to regulate the entertainment business, citing concerns of social harmony (since people are always fighting in Goose Group) and a negative influence on children. In the week after Goose Group's suspension, three more gossip groups were disbanded and at least three more were forcibly paused. And it's not just Douban. Weibo is also banning hundreds of accounts and taking down certain features in order to regulate fan discussions; several fandom communications apps were ordered off of app stores.

It's hard to say what exactly caused the Chinese government to strike at the entertainment industry this year. The raw form of mobilizing that has prospered on Douban is certainly one reason. "The governing regime initially was not very alert to it since the disturbances that these pink feminism movements create are mostly in the entertainment and culture industry," said Gu. "However, when it becomes too big to manage its broader social impacts, the government has to intervene for its goal to maintain order and harmony."

China's entertainment and its political spheres used to be far away. But the fate of Goose Group shows just how far Beijing has expanded its definition of the latter — and how social media's strength as a social force is becoming clearer to China's ruling party. As Fang Kecheng, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, said, Qinglang is another "step in the direction that China is taking in configuring the so-called 'ideal' society."


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more .

Keep Reading Show less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison ( @dgoodison ) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich ) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories