China

China’s TMZ comes for politics, then censors come for it

Goose Group is the latest victim of Beijing's tightening internet culture regulations.

Kris Wu

Goose Group elevates new stories like sexual assault allegations against Kris Wu.

Photo: VCG/Getty Images

Time stopped on Sept. 23, 3 p.m. in the Goose Group. Since that moment, nothing has been published on the once-roiling Chinese online forum with nearly 700,000 registered members, for years the prime source of news on celebrity gossip and internet trends. On its in-app front page, above the week-old posts that normally would have been displaced by newer ones within seconds, sits a notification in red: "This group is being suspended and reformed for two months as a response to the mandate of Operation Qinglang" — the latest regulatory campaign in China that has cracked down on video games, online fan groups, personal finance influencers and many more aspects of internet culture over the summer.

Nobody outside of Beijing's leadership knows for sure what will happen to Goose Group in two months after Operation Qinglang. But last Thursday, a half-dozen other entertainment gossip groups on Douban were also suspended or disbanded. It's looking increasingly possible that Goose Group will be permanently dissolved, another high-profile victim of Beijing's campaign on internet influencers, one increasingly edging into the cultural sphere.

A place for gossip

At the age of 11, Goose Group has long been a formidable force on the Chinese internet. It's hosted on Douban, a popular social media platform that has been called a mix of "IMDb, Goodreads, Spotify, Pinterest, Medium, Twitter and Reddit." In recent years Goose Group has become home to more than news about mega-celebrity scandals; given how often entertainment gossip seeps into discussions of social issues, Goose has come to offer a raw form of civil organizing. Goose Group members have mobilized several times to protest against sexual assault perpetrators, pedophilic websites and misogynistic anime videos.

The group has tried to stay on the safe side of Beijing's red lines, but has still endured periodic shadowbans (i.e., was hidden from search results), a suspension and a renaming over the past three years.

Douban, the platform that hosts Goose Group, has always attracted an unusual crowd. Its complex product portfolio, including a respected book and movie review system, has resulted in Douban being known for two distinct groups of users: cultural elites and fans of hot gossip. Goose Group is the most popular Douban forum for the latter.

In its early years, Goose Group, originally called something like "here comes the gossip" (八卦来了组), was akin to a user-generated TMZ. It was home to rigorously researched — but also sometimes wildly speculative — gossip. Olivia, a graduate student researcher in Beijing, first started following the group as a college student in 2015. "It was like, someone would write a super detailed thread of the entire history [of a celebrity], and others just had a great time reading and discussing it," Olivia said. (She is using an English name to share her experience freely.)

Olivia couldn't comment or start her own post back then, because Goose Group is every bit as exclusive as it is popular. Non-members can read and like a post, but they can't reply to it or start a new one. Olivia waited about two years between submitting her membership application and getting accepted. Another Goose Group member, surnamed Zhao, started reading the group in 2016 but was finally accepted as a member in May 2020.

"[The admins] would pull up your profile and read it line by line: Whether it looks like a paid account, a bot, or an account that has changed ownership," Zhao told Protocol. Aspiring members often had to join a few smaller gossip groups first and post regularly to convince the Goose Group admins of their authenticity and drive. Because of the persistent rarity of the membership, a Goose Group member account's price on second-hand markets like Taobao or Xianyu soared from $9 in 2016 to $90 in 2018. Owning a membership has become a sort of status symbol — insiders refer to it as "owning a property" — signaling how central one is in the production and circulation of gossip.

The combination of exclusivity and originality made Goose Group one of the best gossip sources among Chinese online platforms. It's become so influential that content farms on other platforms like Weibo can make a living simply by reposting the latest discussions from Goose Group. And the group has continued to prosper even though Douban's overall traffic has declined. At the outset of last month, there were over 179,000 active discussion threads on Goose every week, each getting dozens or even hundreds of replies, according to statistics collected by programmer Allen Ji.

'Pink feminism'

Cute name aside, Goose Group is not for the faint of heart. The conversations, usually centering on celebrities' unappealing sides, often become heated, disorderly and even abusive. After being admitted to the group in 2020, Zhao posted just once, an attempt to interpret a Chinese actress' mental state from one of her bizarre social posts. It didn't go well. "There were probably a few hundred replies, and three-fourths of them were insulting me," Zhao said.

Even though the admins of Goose Group have repeatedly emphasized that the group is only for gossip, its tens of thousands of members inevitably react to current affairs, and some entertainment debates have started to hit close to home.

"Chinese entertainment industry and celebrity culture have also become a battleground for public discussion around social issues like gender inequality, sexual harassment and unlawful accumulation of wealth," Jingyi Gu, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Illinois researching Chinese social media platforms and digital culture, told Protocol.

In February, Goose Group members were enraged by an anime series streaming on the video platform Bilibili that objectified women and featured pedophilic plots. They mobilized to report Bilibili's CEO to a local government body and pressured advertisers to drop deals with Bilibili. And they succeeded in getting the series removed.

The group has also helped elevate many news stories that it collectively deems important. Examples include a famous influencer's involvement in a pedophilia website, the sexual assault case of pop singer Kris Wu and the way a female passenger was inappropriately handled by subway security personnel.

Throughout the years, Goose Group has homed in on a unique ideology, often called "pink feminism." Grassroots "pink feminists" go after individuals and private companies instead of tackling big systematic problems, which researcher Gu calls "probably the only actionable form of feminism in the current Chinese context."

"In the case of Goose Group, since many of the targets of pink feminism's actions are celebrities in the entertainment industry or private corporations like Bilibili, it gives its participants a sense of civic engagement without having to become a political dissident," Gu said.

Here comes the crackdown

Several incidents this year foreshadowed the suspension of Goose Group. Hosts of talent contests, the most popular form of reality TV in China these years, were reprimanded in May, suggesting a widening of Beijing's regulatory interests in the culture sphere. Weibo banned the registration of new accounts with "Goose Group" in their name in the same month and finished clearing out existing ones in September. Two weeks ago, Douban disabled commenting across its website for a week, after pledging to regulate celebrity gossiping groups.

"At that time, you couldn't comment on a post, but you could start a new one. Many people were asking: 'Why are we being treated like this? Aren't we on the same side as the state?'" the group member Zhao recalled.

On Sept. 23, the hammer came down, with Goose Group singled out and suspended for two months. Details have not been published about what's going to change after this round of "reform." Douban didn't respond to Protocol's request for comment.

Operation Qinglang, the policy campaign that caused Goose Group's latest suspension, feels different from those before. Beijing seems more determined to regulate the entertainment business, citing concerns of social harmony (since people are always fighting in Goose Group) and a negative influence on children. In the week after Goose Group's suspension, three more gossip groups were disbanded and at least three more were forcibly paused. And it's not just Douban. Weibo is also banning hundreds of accounts and taking down certain features in order to regulate fan discussions; several fandom communications apps were ordered off of app stores.

It's hard to say what exactly caused the Chinese government to strike at the entertainment industry this year. The raw form of mobilizing that has prospered on Douban is certainly one reason. "The governing regime initially was not very alert to it since the disturbances that these pink feminism movements create are mostly in the entertainment and culture industry," said Gu. "However, when it becomes too big to manage its broader social impacts, the government has to intervene for its goal to maintain order and harmony."

China's entertainment and its political spheres used to be far away. But the fate of Goose Group shows just how far Beijing has expanded its definition of the latter — and how social media's strength as a social force is becoming clearer to China's ruling party. As Fang Kecheng, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, said, Qinglang is another "step in the direction that China is taking in configuring the so-called 'ideal' society."

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins