Chinese nationalists have a new target: Lenovo

The PC giant’s low-key success abroad has influencers asking whether it’s betrayed its home country.

 Lenovo Group's CEO Yang Yuanqing.

Lenovo has been engulfed in a renewed controversy in its home country.

Photo: Paul Yeung/Bloomberg via Getty Images

As a new generation of Chinese tech companies go global, often courting controversy in the process, it’s easy to forget Lenovo, the Chinese computer maker that acquired ThinkPad from IBM in 2005 and remains the world’s largest PC company. But Chinese nationalists haven’t; and now, they are sharpening their knives to go after a company that, for so long, seemed to have it comfortably both ways.

For the past month, Lenovo has been engulfed in a renewed controversy in its home country about whether the Beijing-headquartered company is “unpatriotic” and kowtowing to international markets. Sima Nan, an influencer with millions of online followers who made his name by heralding nationalist narratives, has posted 19 videos related to Lenovo since early November in what looks like a crusade against the company.

It’s a position Lenovo has repeatedly found itself in for the past few years. It has been accused of prioritizing international markets over its home market, not supporting fellow Chinese companies like Huawei and forgetting its roots as a state-owned enterprise. With all its resources and influence, Lenovo has never figured out how to pass the never-ending loyalty test administered by online nationalists.

As Chinese tech companies have become multinational giants, Lenovo’s story has become a cautionary tale for latecomers like DiDi, Tencent and ByteDance. The lesson: Success abroad can brew resentment at home.

In many ways, Lenovo paved the way for the next generation of Chinese tech companies. Born in 1984 as a firm wholly controlled by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lenovo underwent several rounds of transformation to become what it is today: a $12 billion, publicly traded company that sells in over 180 countries and employs 52,000 people. Its ambition has never been limited by its Chinese borders. As early as in 2001, CEO Yang Yuanqing had incorporated “an internationalized Lenovo” into the company’s motto. Within 12 years, it had become the top PC company by market share in the world.

But in recent years, Lenovo’s global success has increasingly turned from an asset into a liability.

Following Lenovo’s withdrawal of its application to list on Shanghai’s STAR stock market in October due to “market conditions,” on Nov. 7 the nationalist influencer Sima started posting videos about Lenovo — and hasn’t stopped since. Sima, whose real name is Yu Li but is better known by his alias, boasts millions of followers on popular social media platforms including Weibo, Douyin and Bilibili. His videos accuse the company of stealing state assets, paying its executives too much, having too much debt, posing a national security threat and more.

Some of Sima’s arguments inveigh against practices common among multinationals. He made a 20-minute video about how 14 of Lenovo’s 27 executives aren’t Chinese nationals and argued that this constitutes a security risk for the Chinese government. He also questioned why Lenovo executives, including Yang, are taking home millions of dollars in salary every year.

Sima, while the most vocal, isn’t the first to question Lenovo’s patriotism. In 2018, Lenovo was grilled on social because, two years earlier, it had sided with Qualcomm over Huawei in a telecom technical standards meeting. Yang responded on his personal WeChat timeline: “It was just a vote on technical standards, but two years later, it was hyped as a topic about patriotism.” Later in 2018, Yang received flack for saying, “We are not a Chinese company” in an interview that year with British publication The Inquirer. The company had to issue a statement saying that the quote was misconstrued.

All the controversy has culminated in a domestic distrust of Lenovo. Lenovo has the meme name as "nice to the American imperialists" (美帝良心) for pricing its products lower in the American markets than in China. Changing the company’s Chinese name from “Lenovo” to “Lenovo China” in 2019 was interpreted as a move to bill itself as only a local branch of a global company. The fact that Lenovo wasn’t hit with sanctions like TikTok or Huawei? Proof it’s sucking up to U.S. regulators.

Perhaps Lenovo didn’t anticipate that in addition to fending off international skepticism of it as a Chinese company, it needs to weather attacks at home as a company that has gone “too global.” Lenovo has been largely silent so far.

As the nationalist narrative in China continues to grow, it may damage the global ambitions of China’s homegrown tech companies. Increasingly, a global footprint, once a badge of honor, looks like a liability at home.


Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Wednesday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Latest Stories