China

Data: IPO path narrows on China's STAR Market

The Nasdaq-like bourse was supposed to provide liquidity for promising Chinese tech companies. Instead, Protocol analysis shows it's become a tough gauntlet.

Data: IPO path narrows on China's STAR Market
China tech IPOs to watch in 2021
STR / Contributor via Getty Images

Protocol | China's P3 Intelligence Platform tracks major industries, along with Chinese standards and regulations with the power to affect your business. To learn more or have your company become a subscriber, click here.

On March 30, JD Digits, the fintech subsidiary of ecommerce giant JD.com, joined a bevy of Chinese tech companies who have recently withdrawn their IPO applications from the Nasdaq-style STAR Market on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The stock exchange terminated JD Digits's IPO two days later, a standard response to a withdrawn application, making it the 32nd IPO the exchange pulled off STAR in 2021.

The STAR Market was started in June 2019 to offer budding science and tech companies a way to access public market financing that was less burdensome than listing on China's other stock exchanges. But a Protocol data analysis has found that the Shanghai Stock Exchange terminated the review of a record-high number of IPOs — 31 — on its STAR Market in the first quarter of 2021. And it's not just because the ranks of IPO applicants have grown. Nearly 40% of the IPOs reviewed and granted "final" status in early 2021 — so designated either because they successfully listed or were terminated — were terminated. That's a spike from relatively low termination rates in the first three quarters of 2020:

Almost all of the STAR terminations in the first three months of 2021 were granted after companies had already applied to cancel their IPO plans.

This puts the STAR market on pace to nix 124 IPOs this year if it pulls off the same volume of IPO applications each quarter — a huge jump from 2020, and a sign Beijing is making good on its threats to tighten rules aimed at IPOs. Here's another view of the gauntlet an IPO applicant must run, one that appears tougher in 2020 than 2019:

As the graphic above shows, every currently listed stock on the STAR Market has had to pass through an inquiry, and about 43% of stocks had their application process paused at one point. The key barrier to getting listed on the exchange is gaining the approval of the STAR Market's Stock Listing Committee.

Liberalization, interrupted

It wasn't long ago that the STAR market stood for the liberalization of once-stringent listing rules. In 2019, Chinese regulators tested the waters with a looser, U.S.-style registration-based IPO mechanism on the STAR, bringing a review process that once took between a year and a half and two years down to about six months. A host of Chinese tech startups responded by listing on the STAR Market.

But momentum started to slow late last year. STAR's historical termination rate is 25%, but it started climbing above this number in September 2020, then surged to 56% in January.

Both the total number and the proportion of scuttled IPOs has increased, and fewer firms have chosen to submit IPO applications in the first three months of 2021. December 2020 witnessed the highest number of IPO applications nixed in a month, at 15. After a striking 309 companies rushed to list on STAR between April 2020 and December 2020, the number of IPO applications plunged to 18 in the first quarter of 2021. The first quarter of 2020 saw a similar dip:

The surge of IPO withdrawals and subsequent terminations on the STAR Market over the past six months may be related to tightened rules over the bevy of tech companies rushing to go public there. In late January, the China Securities Regulatory Commission announced it would spot-check IPO-seeking companies' financial and operational documents, business operations and bookkeeping systems. Inspectors would also talk to company executives, employees, suppliers and clients. The CSRC allows companies selected for "on-site inspections" to withdraw their IPO applications within 10 days after they are notified about a forthcoming examination.

The new rule has had a chilling effect; within a month, the Shanghai Stock Exchange revealed that it had attempted to conduct an on-site inspection of nine tech startups seeking STAR IPOs. But seven companies withdrew their IPO applications after learning that they would be inspected.

No turning back?

China's stock market watchdog has continued to signal that IPO review processes will tighten. In late March, CSRC Chairman Yi Huiman urged stock exchanges to "strictly perform [their] audit gatekeeping duties" toward tech companies and startups seeking to IPO. "The registration-based IPO system doesn't mean looser vetting requirements," Yi said.

Yi explained the increasing IPO cancelations were not because companies were dodgy, but because their IPO sponsors hadn't performed adequate diligence. Within two weeks of Yi's comment, the CSRC fined eight prominent investment banks for violations, five of which had sponsored IPOs on Shanghai's STAR Market.

The crackdown is broad; a Protocol analysis of the four industries with 20 or more IPO applications that have reached "final status" suggests one field isn't being favored over another. There are four industry categories used by the CSRC that have more than 20 IPO applications in STAR's history: specialized equipment manufacturing (专用设备制造业); pharmaceutical manufacturing (医药制造业); computer, communication and other electronic equipment manufacturing (计算机、通信和其他电子设备制造业); and software and information technology services (软件和信息技术服务业). Each has a historical termination rate of about 25%.

Financial experts say even more stringent rules on IPO applications are coming, as the CSRC has pledged to "improve the quality" of listed companies through new delisting mechanisms and a higher bar for future IPOs. On top of that, according to a new amendment to China's criminal law, effective March 1, harsher penalties will be imposed for activities that falsify "asset evaluations, accounting, auditing, legal services, sponsorship, and other supporting documents related to the issuance of securities."

"I believe that, unlike in the past, this round of regulatory tightening will be long and lasting," Fu Lichun, director of research at Northeast Securities, wrote in an analyst's note. "The tightening of regulation is a systemic change, and the decline in the IPO approval rate will continue."

Podcasts

1Password's CEO is ready for a password-free future

Fresh off a $620 million raise, 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner talks about the future of passwords.

1Password is a password manager, but it has plans to be even more.

Business is booming for 1Password. The company just announced it has raised $620 million, at a valuation of $6.8 billion, from a roster of A-list celebrities and well-known venture capitalists.

But what does a password manager need with $620 million? Jeff Shiner, 1Password’s CEO, has some plans. He’s building the team fast — 1Password has tripled in size in the last two years, up to 500 employees, and plans to double again this year — while also expanding the vision of what a password manager can do. 1Password has long been a consumer-first product, but the biggest opportunity lies in bringing the company’s knowhow, its user experience, and its security chops into the business world. 1Password already has more than 100,000 business customers, and it plans to expand fast.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.
Policy

Biden wants to digitize the government. Can these techies deliver?

A December executive order requires federal agencies to overhaul clunky systems. Meet the team trying to make that happen.

The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful.

Photo: Joe Daniel Price/Getty Images

Early last year, top White House officials embarked on a fact-finding mission with technical leaders inside government agencies. They wanted to know the answer to a specific question: If there was anything federal agencies could do to improve the average American’s experience interacting with the government, what would it be?

The list, of course, was a long one.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Entertainment

5 takeaways from Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition

Microsoft just bought one of the world’s largest third-party game publishers. What now?

The nearly $70 billion acquisition gives Microsoft access to some of the most valuable brands in gaming.

Image: Microsoft Gaming

Just one week after Take-Two took the crown for biggest-ever industry acquisition, Microsoft strolled in Tuesday morning and dropped arguably the most monumental gaming news bombshell in years with its purchase of Activision Blizzard. The deal, at nearly $70 billion in all cash, dwarfs Take-Two’s purchase of Zynga, and it stands to reshape gaming as we know it.

The deal raises a number of pressing questions about the future of Activision Blizzard’s workplace culture issues, exclusivity in the game industry and whether such massive consolidation may trigger a regulatory response. None of these may be easily answered anytime soon, as the deal could take up to 18 months to close. But the question marks hanging over Activision Blizzard will loom large in the industry for the foreseeable future as Microsoft navigates its new role as one of the three largest game makers on the planet.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Enterprise

Why AMD is waiting for China to approve its $35B bid for Xilinx

There’s another big chip deal in regulatory limbo. AMD’s $35 billion bid for Xilinx, which would transform its data-center business, is being held up by China.

AMD announced a $35 billion bid to acquire Xilinx more than a year ago.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

AMD has spent its entire corporate life as a second-class citizen to Intel. That’s just one reason why CEO Lisa Su seized an opportunity with a $35 billion stock deal to snap up programmable chipmaker Xilinx more than a year ago at one of Intel’s weakest moments in decades.

The full extent of a manufacturing stumble that delayed Intel's next-generation chips six months became apparent in 2020, to Su and AMD's considerable advantage. AMD’s share price soared as it became clear the longtime also-ran stood to gain significant market share, granting Su a considerably more valuable currency for acquisitions such as Xilinx, which makes chips for data center networking, cars, military use and satellites.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Latest Stories
Bulletins