Another headache for Chinese Big Tech: public interest lawsuits

In an announcement similar to a class-action suit, authorities say the "youth mode" in Tencent superapp WeChat doesn't comply with China's child protection laws.

A woman walks outside the headquarters of Tencent while looking at her phone.
SHENZHEN, CHINA - AUGUST 19: A woman walks outside the headquarters of Tencent on August 19, 2020 in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province of China. (Photo by VCG/VCG via Getty Images)
VCG / Contributor/ Getty Images

Tencent has another regulatory headache, one that Chinese Big Tech isn't used to treating: On Friday evening, local prosecutors in Beijing launched a "public interest lawsuit" against WeChat, stating that the superapp's "youth mode" doesn't comply with China's child protection laws.

Currently, WeChat's youth mode, or parental control mode, disables certain functions like mobile payments and restricts the social media content that users can consume. The announcement didn't specify which feature of the youth mode violates the law. Hours later, Tencent's WeChat team replied publicly on Weibo that it would "carefully carry out self examination of WeChat's 'youth mode' features" and "respond to the civil public interest lawsuit with sincerity."

The lawsuit against WeChat hasn't been officially filed, just announced, and it's unclear who will be the plaintiff. The Haidian District People's Procuratorate, the local prosecutor that made the Friday announcement, said it would wait 30 days for relevant government bodies and civil society groups to submit evidence to the prosecutor. According to Chinese law, as Chinese publication Yicai reported, if no other group decides to become the plaintiff, the procuratorate can launch the case itself.

Child protection has always been a focus of China's internet regulations, even though some of its actions have been seen as overly protective. But leveraging public interest lawsuits appears to be a recent addition to the regulatory toolbox.

Similar to class-action lawsuits in the United States, a public interest lawsuit in China is filed on behalf of a group of people by prosecutors or civil society associations. Since it became popular in 2016, it has mostly been deployed in environmental protection and consumer rights cases. But in June 2020, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate said it would expand the scope of public interest lawsuits to issues like digital rights, the rights of minors and public health.

In March this year, short video platform Kuaishou settled a public interest lawsuit with local prosecutors in Hangzhou, the eastern Chinese city that has become a leader in the technology industry. Kuaishou was accused of infringing on minors' rights by collecting their information without notifying their guardians. While the details of the settlement deal are unclear, state news agency Xinhua reported that the platform was asked to complete a comprehensive reform and donate the compensation to relevant charity groups.

Then in June, Tencent was sued by a nonprofit organization Beijing Children's Law Aid and Research Centre, who accuses Tencent's massively popular game Honor of Kings of hosting age-inappropriate content, encouraging video game addiction and other charges. There has been no public update to the status of this case. But last week Tencent introduced more restrictions for underage players of the game, including a one-hour cap on daily play time.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at
Latest Stories