China

VPNs are out, more security reviews are in: What’s in China’s new cyber rules

Beijing works on the practicality of its groundbreaking data laws.

Brick wall

The new rules show governmental acknowledgment of the Great Firewall for the first time.

Image: Waldemar Brandt / Protocol

On Sunday, the Cyberspace Administration of China released the draft "Cyber Data Security Administrative Rules," which covers everything from penalizing VPN tools to enlarging the scope of cybersecurity reviews to further banning monopolistic practices to ensuring privacy data protection. It contains a number of surprises, including governmental acknowledgement of the Great Firewall for the first time.

To govern a world built on data, Beijing has to give definitions to terms that didn't exist a decade ago and explain the nooks and crannies of how previous data laws will be implemented. This draft regulation does just that.

"This draft can, to some extent, be seen as the implementation guidance of Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law," Zuo Xiaodong, vice president of the China Research Institute for Information Security, was quoted saying in the Southern Metropolis Daily. "But that's not the entirety of it."

What Zuo means is that there are also places where the new regulation diverges from — or even slightly contradicts — the language of previous laws. The South Metropolis Daily also quoted two other experts who said the new regulation has pushed the boundaries of online platform responsibilities further than what was previously defined by the law. (The regulation can still change, as it is currently seeking comment until Dec. 13, and these discrepancies with previous law can be amended.)

Outlawing VPNs

One of the most noticeable pieces of new language in the draft regulation is its direct acknowledgement of the Great Firewall, a system China uses to filter inbound information and censor a great number of news and social media websites.

Article 41 of the new regulation, which Henry Gao, associate professor of law at Singapore Management University, calls "the biggest bombshell," says the state has established a cross-border data-security gateway to block out any information that originates outside the country and is banned by Chinese laws.

"[As far as I know], this is the very first time the government openly recognizes the existence of the Great Firewall in a law/regulation," Gao wrote in a Twitter thread.

Article 41 further decrees that no individual or organization is allowed to help others circumvent the Great Firewall, even just by hosting a server or processing payment for firewall workarounds. This is clearly directed at the popular use of VPN tools, which many Chinese individuals employ to keep connected to parts of the internet that are otherwise blocked.

This is not the first time VPNs have been banned in China (except for state-sanctioned companies). Back in 2017, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released a notice that said it would start clearing any activities of providing illegal VPN tools. But the new regulation would go beyond that by also outlawing peripheral activities: for example, punishing an app store that publishes a VPN app in China.

"This should dissuade any foreign VPN company from registering and running its business in China," Benjamin Ismail, GreatFire's campaign and advocacy director and Apple Censorship project coordinator, told Protocol. "With such new legislation, we might see even more efforts from companies like Apple to collaborate with the authorities and see that no one and no company can offer solutions bypassing the Great Firewall."

Security reviews for companies listing in Hong Kong

The new regulations also address a big question from this summer: whether listing in Hong Kong can save Chinese tech companies from the problem of an unpredictable cybersecurity review. The answer is no.

After DiDi's New York listing went terribly wrong in July, more than 10 Chinese tech companies have withdrawn or suspended their IPO plans in the United States. Ximalaya, the top audio-content platform in China, recycled its U.S. prospectus and submitted it to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Many other companies may follow suit.

Why? Because at the time, listing in Hong Kong was not going to subject the company to the same level of government scrutiny as listing in the U.S.

But that's no longer the case. The Sunday regulation singles out the Hong Kong market and says that companies that "list in Hong Kong and may impact China's national security" also have to apply for cybersecurity review.

Only a vague criterion of national security is needed to invoke Hong Kong review, giving regulators more leeway in determining whether one is necessary.

More protection of personal data

The new regulation also introduces many new rules around personal information.

Article 45 of the regulation treats communication between two individuals and among more than two individuals (i.e., group chats) differently, giving the former more protection. This is the first time such a distinction has ever been made, offering more questions than answers as to implementation.

Several articles in the regulation involve how a company should inform users of its data-collecting practices. Article 43 says that whenever an internet platform drafts or revises its policies concerning privacy and consumer rights, it needs to seek feedback from the public for at least 30 days.

When a company does tell users what information is collected, Article 20 says it needs to inform users of the "purpose, method, category, frequency and timing of how personal information is collected." By adding "frequency and timing" — absent from the PIPL — the regulations address recent concerns that a few top Chinese apps were found accessing user information dozens of times a day without users' knowledge.

For Angela Zhang, associate law professor at the University of Hong Kong, the biggest change in these regulations concerns how consent between platforms and individuals works. Article 49 of the new regulations requires platforms to get "opt-in" consent from users before making algorithmic recommendations, instead of "opt-out" consent, which is much easier to get.

"There is a big difference between opt-in or opt-out requirement due to consumers' cognitive bias," Zhang wrote on Twitter. "When personalized recommendation is the default, few consumers notice and bother to opt-out. But when consumers are required to opt-in, it could make a difference."

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

While there remains debate among economists about whether we are officially in a full-blown recession, the signs are certainly there. Like most executives right now, the outlook concerns me.

In any case, businesses aren’t waiting for the official pronouncement. They’re already bracing for impact as U.S. inflation and interest rates soar. Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 — the highest increase since November 1981 — and the Federal Reserve is targeting an interest rate of 3% by the end of this year.

Keep Reading Show less
Nancy Sansom

Nancy Sansom is the Chief Marketing Officer for Versapay, the leader in Collaborative AR. In this role, she leads marketing, demand generation, product marketing, partner marketing, events, brand, content marketing and communications. She has more than 20 years of experience running successful product and marketing organizations in high-growth software companies focused on HCM and financial technology. Prior to joining Versapay, Nancy served on the senior leadership teams at PlanSource, Benefitfocus and PeopleMatter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Enterprise

These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Fintech

Kraken's CEO got tired of being in finance

Jesse Powell tells Protocol the bureaucratic obligations of running a financial services business contributed to his decision to step back from his role as CEO of one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken is going through a major leadership change after what has been a tough year for the crypto powerhouse, and for departing CEO Jesse Powell.

The crypto market is still struggling to recover from a major crash, although Kraken appears to have navigated the crisis better than other rivals. Despite his exchange’s apparent success, Powell found himself in the hot seat over allegations published in The New York Times that he made insensitive comments on gender and race that sparked heated conversations within the company.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories
Bulletins