VPNs are out, more security reviews are in: What’s in China’s new cyber rules

Beijing works on the practicality of its groundbreaking data laws.

Brick wall

The new rules show governmental acknowledgment of the Great Firewall for the first time.

Image: Waldemar Brandt / Protocol

On Sunday, the Cyberspace Administration of China released the draft "Cyber Data Security Administrative Rules," which covers everything from penalizing VPN tools to enlarging the scope of cybersecurity reviews to further banning monopolistic practices to ensuring privacy data protection. It contains a number of surprises, including governmental acknowledgement of the Great Firewall for the first time.

To govern a world built on data, Beijing has to give definitions to terms that didn't exist a decade ago and explain the nooks and crannies of how previous data laws will be implemented. This draft regulation does just that.

"This draft can, to some extent, be seen as the implementation guidance of Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law," Zuo Xiaodong, vice president of the China Research Institute for Information Security, was quoted saying in the Southern Metropolis Daily. "But that's not the entirety of it."

What Zuo means is that there are also places where the new regulation diverges from — or even slightly contradicts — the language of previous laws. The South Metropolis Daily also quoted two other experts who said the new regulation has pushed the boundaries of online platform responsibilities further than what was previously defined by the law. (The regulation can still change, as it is currently seeking comment until Dec. 13, and these discrepancies with previous law can be amended.)

Outlawing VPNs

One of the most noticeable pieces of new language in the draft regulation is its direct acknowledgement of the Great Firewall, a system China uses to filter inbound information and censor a great number of news and social media websites.

Article 41 of the new regulation, which Henry Gao, associate professor of law at Singapore Management University, calls "the biggest bombshell," says the state has established a cross-border data-security gateway to block out any information that originates outside the country and is banned by Chinese laws.

"[As far as I know], this is the very first time the government openly recognizes the existence of the Great Firewall in a law/regulation," Gao wrote in a Twitter thread.

Article 41 further decrees that no individual or organization is allowed to help others circumvent the Great Firewall, even just by hosting a server or processing payment for firewall workarounds. This is clearly directed at the popular use of VPN tools, which many Chinese individuals employ to keep connected to parts of the internet that are otherwise blocked.

This is not the first time VPNs have been banned in China (except for state-sanctioned companies). Back in 2017, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released a notice that said it would start clearing any activities of providing illegal VPN tools. But the new regulation would go beyond that by also outlawing peripheral activities: for example, punishing an app store that publishes a VPN app in China.

"This should dissuade any foreign VPN company from registering and running its business in China," Benjamin Ismail, GreatFire's campaign and advocacy director and Apple Censorship project coordinator, told Protocol. "With such new legislation, we might see even more efforts from companies like Apple to collaborate with the authorities and see that no one and no company can offer solutions bypassing the Great Firewall."

Security reviews for companies listing in Hong Kong

The new regulations also address a big question from this summer: whether listing in Hong Kong can save Chinese tech companies from the problem of an unpredictable cybersecurity review. The answer is no.

After DiDi's New York listing went terribly wrong in July, more than 10 Chinese tech companies have withdrawn or suspended their IPO plans in the United States. Ximalaya, the top audio-content platform in China, recycled its U.S. prospectus and submitted it to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Many other companies may follow suit.

Why? Because at the time, listing in Hong Kong was not going to subject the company to the same level of government scrutiny as listing in the U.S.

But that's no longer the case. The Sunday regulation singles out the Hong Kong market and says that companies that "list in Hong Kong and may impact China's national security" also have to apply for cybersecurity review.

Only a vague criterion of national security is needed to invoke Hong Kong review, giving regulators more leeway in determining whether one is necessary.

More protection of personal data

The new regulation also introduces many new rules around personal information.

Article 45 of the regulation treats communication between two individuals and among more than two individuals (i.e., group chats) differently, giving the former more protection. This is the first time such a distinction has ever been made, offering more questions than answers as to implementation.

Several articles in the regulation involve how a company should inform users of its data-collecting practices. Article 43 says that whenever an internet platform drafts or revises its policies concerning privacy and consumer rights, it needs to seek feedback from the public for at least 30 days.

When a company does tell users what information is collected, Article 20 says it needs to inform users of the "purpose, method, category, frequency and timing of how personal information is collected." By adding "frequency and timing" — absent from the PIPL — the regulations address recent concerns that a few top Chinese apps were found accessing user information dozens of times a day without users' knowledge.

For Angela Zhang, associate law professor at the University of Hong Kong, the biggest change in these regulations concerns how consent between platforms and individuals works. Article 49 of the new regulations requires platforms to get "opt-in" consent from users before making algorithmic recommendations, instead of "opt-out" consent, which is much easier to get.

"There is a big difference between opt-in or opt-out requirement due to consumers' cognitive bias," Zhang wrote on Twitter. "When personalized recommendation is the default, few consumers notice and bother to opt-out. But when consumers are required to opt-in, it could make a difference."


Niantic is building an AR map of the world

The company’s Visual Positioning System will help developers build location-based AR games and experiences; a new social app aims to help with AR content discovery.

VPS will allow developers to build location-based AR experiences for tens of thousands of public spaces.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go maker Niantic has quietly been building a 3D AR map of the world. Now, the company is getting ready to share the fruits of its labor with third-party developers: Niantic announced the launch of its Lightship Visual Positioning System at its developer summit in San Francisco on Tuesday. VPS will allow developers to build location-based AR experiences for tens of thousands of public spaces, Niantic said.

Niantic also announced a new service called Campfire that adds a social discovery layer to AR, starting with Niantic’s own games. Both announcements show that Niantic wants to be much more than a game developer with just one or two hit apps (and a couple of flops). Instead, it aims to play a key role in the future of AR — and it’s relying on millions of Ingress and Pokémon Go players to help build that future.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


Why it's time to give all your employees executive coaching

In an effort to boost retention and engagement, companies are rolling out access to executive coaching to all of their employees.

Coaching is among personalized and exclusive benefits employers chose to offer their workforce during the pandemic.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Executive coaching has long been a quiet force behind leaders in the tech industry, but that premium benefit, often only offered to the top executives, is changing. A new wave of executive coaching services are hitting the market aimed at workers who would have traditionally been excluded from access.

Tech companies know that in order to stay competitive in today’s still-hot job market, it pays to offer more personalized and exclusive benefits. Chief People Officer Annette Reavis says Envoy, a workplace tech company, offers all employees access to a broad range of opportunities. “We offer everyone an L&D credit that they can spend on outside learning, whether it's executive coaching or learning a new coding language. We do this so that people can have access to and learn skills specific to their job.”

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.


Microsoft thinks Windows developers are ready for virtual workstations

The new Microsoft Dev Box service, coupled with Azure Deployment Environments, lets developers go from code to the cloud faster than ever.

Microsoft hopes a new cloud service will address one of developers' biggest challenges.

Photo: Grant Hindsley/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Microsoft hopes a new cloud service will address one of the biggest challenges that developers have raised with the technology giant over the last several years: managing developer workstations.

Microsoft Dev Box, now in private preview, creates virtual developer workstations running its Windows operating system in the cloud, allowing development teams to standardize how those fundamental tools are initialized, set up and managed.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


Okta CEO: 'We should have done a better job' with the Lapsus$ breach

In an interview with Protocol, Okta CEO Todd McKinnon said the cybersecurity firm could’ve done a lot of things better after the Lapsus$ breach of a third-party support provider earlier this year.

From talking to hundreds of customers, “I've had a good sense of the sentiment and the frustrations,” McKinnon said.

Photo: David Paul Morris via Getty Images

Okta co-founder and CEO Todd McKinnon agrees with you: Disclosing a breach that impacts customer data should not take months.

“If that happens in January, customers can't be finding out about it in March,” McKinnon said in an interview with Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories