The Inflation Reduction Act is testing Big Tech’s climate resolve

The bill would help Big Tech meet its climate goals, but industry trade groups are coming out against key tax provisions and could sink the legislation.

Sen. Joe Manchin looking down from a dais.

The tax provision could be why Silicon Valley has stayed silent on the agreement reached by Sens. Joe Manchin and Chuck Schumer.

Photo: Greg Nash/Getty Images

Big Tech might be a little afraid of taxes. Specifically, a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act that would require corporations with more than $1 billion in annual profits to pay a minimum tax rate of 15%. That provision could be why Silicon Valley has largely stayed silent on the agreement reached by Sens. Joe Manchin and Chuck Schumer despite the bill containing nearly $370 billion in funding that would also help tech companies reach their climate goals.

Despite their lofty net zero commitments, no major tech companies outside of Salesforce have issued statements in support of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Their silence says a lot.

In fact, trade associations that many tech giants are members of have come out with statements against the 15% tax provision. The Business Roundtable — a major lobbying group whose members include Tim Cook, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Marc Benioff and Ted Sarandos — issued a statement on Thursday saying that it “strongly opposes” legislation that would raise taxes and “discourage investment in the U.S.” Urging Congress to reject “harmful tax increases,” the association also conveniently and completely sidestepped any mention of climate change in its statement.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose many dues-paying members also include the tech industry, also issued a strongly worded statement opposing the budget reconciliation bill, arguing that it would “discourage investment and undermine economic growth and innovation.” The group didn’t mention the bill’s climate provisions. (Though its stance has since softened, the chamber also peddled climate denial for decades.)

“Companies are doing the calculation of, ‘OK, how does this 15% hit us?’” said Zach Friedman, the director of federal policy at Ceres, a climate nonprofit focused on market-based solutions. He pointed out a similar corporate income tax agreement in Europe that companies are already having to factor into their business and policy decisions. The U.S. is also one of 136 countries that agreed to a deal as part of the OECD to set a 15% minimum corporate tax rate last year.

“Companies are doing the calculation of, ‘OK, how does this 15% hit us?’”

With 49 Democratic senators ostensibly lined up to vote for the Inflation Reduction Act, the trade groups appear to be targeting the vote of Sen. Kyrsten Sinema. She has yet to say if she’ll vote on the bill, and while she has generally been supportive of climate legislation, she has taken the side of big business when it comes to taxes. Friedman said the bill was crafted in a way that is “largely responsive to Senator Sinema's concerns.” The corporate minimum tax rate part of the bill is also a key component to ensure that it can be passed via reconciliation, which would only require a simple majority for it to clear the Senate.

There’s “unequivocally” a divergence between tech companies’ public climate commitments and what they’re actually willing to give up to turn those commitments into actions, said Jamie Alexander, founding director of Drawdown Labs. Her group partners with the private sector on climate action.

Despite its membership in Business Roundtable, Google is also part of the Drawdown Labs consortium, which bans lobbying against climate change measures as a condition of membership. (Its partners have shown reticence to engage in relatively modest calls for climate action before.)

Alexander was “shocked” that the corporate tax provision made it into the 725-page Inflation Reduction Act. For most of the business community, the resounding consensus was “‘You need to take this out in order for us to support this,’” she said. “Companies are going to try to push back on this, which was my main fear when I saw that in there.”

Tech companies may, of course, still be advocating for the legislation behind closed doors. The anti-IRA rhetoric is “largely coming from trade associations themselves and not companies,” Friedman said, noting that there is “definitely some misalignment between companies and these trade associations.”

The anti-IRA rhetoric is “largely coming from trade associations themselves and not companies.”

Still, it’s clear that companies have their own platforms from which to urge Congress to pass climate legislation, taxes and all. Despite the fact that the measure would add more renewables to the grid, get more EVs on the road and accelerate investment in clean tech — all things Big Tech is hypothetically in favor of — the industry has stayed curiously silent on the climate deal.

A Meta rep told Protocol the company doesn’t have a comment at this time on the bill. Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Netflix did not respond to requests for comment for this piece nor did they offer comment last week after the bill was released.

When asked about the association’s stance on the Inflation Reduction Act’s climate provisions, a spokesperson for Business Roundtable wrote in an email to Protocol, “We are analyzing all aspects of the bill, and our positions on legislation are always based on the totality of what is included. We have spoken out on the tax proposals included in the bill and here is what we’ve said,” including the group’s statement against the provision.

“There’s no bigger threat to economic growth than climate change,” Alexander said. In her view, companies need to move beyond the potential tax hit and consider already-present climate threats to business as usual, from supply chain disruptions to lost working hours from wildfires and air pollution. She added that “requires a longer-term perspective” than quarterly earnings.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories