Climate

What the Ethereum Merge could mean for mining rigs

The Merge is almost here, raising the question of what will happen to all the mining rigs that are about to become useless.

An employee wearing a protective face mask inspects Sapphire Technology Ltd. AMD graphics processing units (GPU) at the Evobits crypto farm.

When it comes to Ethereum’s Merge, determining just how much e-waste will be added to the world’s growing pile is unclear but still troubling.

Photo: Akos Stiller/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Merge is finally happening.

Ethereum is upgrading from proof of work to proof of stake, with the switch likely to happen in the coming week. If successful, this will be a huge win for the climate; the Merge is projected to cut energy consumption tied to mining by about 99%.

It’s not all cut-and-dried though. An open question post-Merge is what will become of the hardware used to mine ether, which will essentially become stranded assets. These suddenly useless rigs could be chucked in the trash, contributing to our mounting e-waste problem, or repurposed in other ways and continue to fuel the climate crisis.

Crypto mining’s monster carbon footprint comes courtesy of the GPUs used to do the calculations that keep the blockchain secure, all running at the same time. Both bitcoin and Ethereum, the world’s two biggest cryptocurrencies, currently rely on this approach, known as proof of work. Ethereum’s switch to proof of stake will only require one computer chosen at random to do the task, making the need for thousands of mining rigs all working in tandem suddenly obsolete.

What happens to mining hardware at the end of its life is also a problem for the climate. Bitcoin mining contributes an estimated 37,000 tons of electronic waste per year, an amount roughly on par with the Netherlands. This concern has caught the attention of the White House, which cited the research in the crypto and climate report it put out last week.

That e-waste can damage the climate and is an even greater concern given the threat it poses to the health of communities adjacent to dumping sites. When not properly disposed of, it can cause air and water pollution, as well as exposure to toxic elements like lead and mercury.

E-waste can be recycled, but it usually isn’t. In general, only about 20% of it is ever actually recycled, according to a UN report.

When it comes to Ethereum’s Merge, determining just how much e-waste will be added to the world’s growing pile is unclear but still troubling. “Determining how much electronic waste this is going to produce is a tougher question,” said Alex de Vries, the founder of Digiconomist, the source of the bitcoin e-waste estimate cited by the White House.

Unlike bitcoin, Ethereum mining rigs can generally be repurposed for other uses, according to Sam Huestis, an associate with RMI’s Climate Intelligence Program. (Bitcoin mining rigs have become so specialized, they’re basically unable to do anything but mine bitcoin.)

Some of the biggest mining companies have indicated that they’re going to be repurposing their rigs for AI and cloud computing.

HIVE Blockchain Technologies’ roughly 38,000 GPUs used to mine Ethereum “can be used for cloud computing and AI applications, and rendering for engineering applications, in addition to scientific modeling of fluid dynamics,” the crypto mining company said in a statement.

Another public mining company, Hut 8 Mining, which installed 180 GPUs in its data center in August despite the coming Merge, said that “the multi-workload machines will be designed to pivot on demand to provide Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, or VFX rendering services to customers.”

For the most part, however, Ethereum mining is still very decentralized, with many small-scale miners and individuals operating much more modest setups out of their basements or garages. What they’ll do is still up in the air.

Many of the graphics cards used for Ethereum mining “will be out of business” post-Merge, de Vries said, but they can theoretically be put on the resale market, since they’re the same graphics processing used for gaming or photo and video editing.

The caveat, however, is that gamers and video editors aren’t necessarily eager to buy secondhand GPUs that were previously used for mining, since mining crypto all day puts a lot of strain on the hardware. The 24/7 use of these machines at high temperatures means the components degrade faster than your average GPU. “It’s a wear issue,” Huestis said.

Moreover, global GPU prices are already falling, in a classic tale of decreasing demand and surging supply. Miners looking to offload their out-of-work rigs aren’t likely to get much in return for them, increasing the odds of them being tossed out.

Another scenario is that these rigs could be repurposed to mine other proof-of-work chains, like Ethereum Classic, which was created after a fork in the Ethereum blockchain in 2016. Miners could also mutiny and continue mining Ethereum via proof-of-work, creating another fork in the blockchain. But incentive to do either of these things would be low, given how much less these assets would be worth.

For context, the value of Ethereum Classic is about 2% of Ethereum’s worth today, so there isn’t much incentive for miners to switch to mining this much smaller network. What that means for miners is that the cost of running these machines would likely be greater than the potential payout. “Other networks are too small to sustain that many devices,” and a mass transition is “highly unlikely,” de Vries said.

In either case, switching to proof of stake won’t necessarily negate the climate impacts of crypto mining, despite all the rosy predictions.

The mining sites where Ethereum rigs are running aren’t just going to be turned off, according to Andrew Webber, founder and CEO of Digital Power Optimization, a cryptocurrency mining-as-a-service startup. Most of those mines could simply dump their Ethereum GPUs and install mining rigs for another blockchain, likely bitcoin, which consumes much more energy than Ethereum. Bitcoin miners will likely be eager to move into the vacated sites, given the shortage of hosting space.

That scenario probably won’t come to pass right away, given the recent crypto crash. Miners are getting squeezed, so they’re unlikely to spend a lot on expansion at the moment, de Vries said. If Bitcoin prices were to double, though, he said “that’ll be a different story.”

The Ethereum rigs that do stay online and switch to cloud computing or AI applications will still be consuming energy. So while the Merge will ease at least some of crypto’s strain on the grid and reduce the associated carbon pollution, “it’s not like things are going to change that much,” Webber said, from an overall energy use perspective. That points to the ever-present problem facing the grid and our energy mix: the need to rapidly transition from fossil fuels to renewables.

Policy

Steel decided World War II. Chips will decide whatever is next.

“Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology” foreshadows the coming battle between nations over semiconductors.

“Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies.

Image: Scribner; Protocol

“World War II was decided by steel and aluminum, and followed shortly thereafter by the Cold War, which was defined by atomic weapons,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, writes in the introduction to his latest book. So what’s next? According to Miller, the next era, including the rivalry between the U.S. and China, is all about computing power.

That tech rivalry and the story of how the chip industry got from four to 11.8 billion transistors are all part of Miller’s book, “Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology,” which comes out Oct. 4. “Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies: three from the U.S., one from Japan, and one from the Netherlands.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins