Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

Microsoft logo on laptop surface

Microsoft published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo by Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

The company has put together one of the most aggressive climate plans in Big Tech, including reaching carbon negativity by 2030. Yet its carbon emissions rose last year by 21.5%, owing to an uptick in data center construction and in customers using its products. Because the grid remains largely fossil-fueled, the company’s emissions will likely be stuck on the wrong trajectory unless more steps are taken to transition to cleaner sources of energy. And the only way that’s happening is through policy interventions.

There are areas in the new briefs that are both surprising to see a tech company pushing for and ones that fit with established patterns.

On the predictable side of the ledger, Microsoft said it supports “public policy changes that will result in a significantly expanded and increasingly decarbonized grid.” For a company that sells electronics and runs power-sucking data centers, public incentives to clean up the grid are a no-brainer.

Microsoft also espoused its support for policies that foster nascent carbon removal technology, specifically name-dropping the 45Q tax credit, which was recently bolstered by the Inflation Reduction and Chips Acts. The company said it will back policies that set standards and support removal services that store carbon for at least 100 years.

Going carbon-negative hinges on carbon dioxide removal. But those developing services remain expensive, costing hundreds of dollars per ton of removed carbon, and companies offering them are only capable of removing thousands of tons per year. For reference, Microsoft’s Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions alone added up to nearly 14 million tons in 2021.

“We know the opposition will show up in force; we need Microsoft and others to lobby like they mean it.”

The tandem policies of cleaning up the grid and finding ways to bring down the cost of CDR, though, offer a pathway for Microsoft to meet its goals. A company spokesperson told Protocol in an email that Microsoft is “very open to harmonizing positions, building coalitions, and accelerating policy action to address carbon and electricity policies consistent with our policy briefs.” The spokesperson also said Microsoft could find common cause with a number of other major tech companies that have also made plans to go 100% clean energy and put up advanced market commitments for CDR services.

More surprisingly, the tech giant also said it would advocate for policies that enable climate finance aid to flow from the Global North to the Global South to, among other things, “advance immediately beyond traditional carbon-intensive infrastructure.”

Getting the Global South to leapfrog fossil fuels is imperative in the coming decades as non-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries are projected to see carbon emissions rise even while OECD countries see them fall. Yet while other tech companies — notably Salesforce — have committed to nature-based solutions in the Global South, Microsoft’s commitment to advocate for climate finance policies that speed up grid decarbonization is a unique step. (Having reliable clean power would, of course, open up new markets for Microsoft’s products and services.)

“It is great to see clearly articulated support for a wider range of climate policies, and a much clearer sense of urgency,” Bill Weihl, founder and executive director of ClimateVoice, told Protocol. “I hope many other companies will follow their lead and speak up loudly in favor of a broad suite of policies in every city, state, and country where they operate.”

Now the question is how Microsoft will advocate for these policies. Company president Brad Smith showed up at the White House in January to “offer a full-throated endorsement of the climate provisions” in the Build Back Better Act, though that was after Sen. Joe Manchin had already effectively torpedoed it. When the Inflation Reduction Act popped up as a slimmed-down version of Build Back Better, though, Microsoft did not immediately have comment on it.

Microsoft is also a member of the Business Roundtable, an industry lobbying group that said there was “merit” to the climate provisions in the Build Back Better Act while opposing the tax increases that would’ve paid for them. A company spokesperson said it welcomed the “opportunity to engage with numerous organizations that are addressing this and many other issues simultaneously, including the Business Roundtable, which we respect and appreciate.”

There are signs that tech companies are pushing the trade group to be more progressive around climate, though Weihl said ClimateVoice “would hope to see Microsoft explicitly distance itself from trade associations on climate policy, and invest more heavily in advocacy to counter the opposition and obstruction from those groups.”

“We know the opposition will show up in force; we need Microsoft and others to lobby like they mean it,” Weihl said.

While nearly 75% of Microsoft’s political donations in this cycle have gone to Democratic candidates and organizations, the company has also committed a fair chunk of change to Republican candidates who actively obstruct the policies Microsoft says it supports. Its corporate PAC has also donated slightly more to Republicans in this election cycle.

Sen. Mike Lee is the top Republican recipient of Microsoft’s money this cycle, receiving nearly $45,000 from the company and its employees while the company gave another $5,000 to his PAC, according to data compiled by Open Secrets. He is also a vehement climate denier and has given floor speeches mocking climate change by invoking “Sharknado.” (Yes, really.) Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers has received $22,400 from Microsoft, including $5,000 from the company PAC; the company also gave McMorris Rodgers' PAC $10,000. While she accepts the science of climate change, she has a lifetime score of 5% with the League of Conservation Voters, reflecting a weak voting record when it actually comes to addressing the crisis.

“Given the breadth of our policy agenda, it’s unlikely we’ll agree with any official on every issue, but we’ve learned that engagement — even when individuals hold different positions — is an essential part of achieving progress,” a Microsoft spokesperson said.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories