The Twitter bot tracking Russian oil and gas tankers in real time

Greenpeace is using ship traffic data to track the movements of Russian oil tankers.

Greenpeace activists in a small skiff alongside an oil tanker from Russia tagged with "oil fuels war."

Greenpeace's tracker bot helps activists intercept Russian oil tankers bound for port, including this group near the Danish port of Rotterdam.

© Axel Heimken / Greenpeace

In the days after the U.S. banned imports of Russian oil and gas, Audrey Uhlmann and her team took to their keyboards. Inspired by the Russian Oligarch Jets tracker on Twitter, she and her team of data scientists at Greenpeace U.K. created a similar tool, but for tracking the movements of tankers transporting Russian oil around the globe.

The U.S. ban on imports has a 45-day wind-down period for existing contracts, and the sector is taking advantage accordingly. Per the tool’s data, roughly 10 tankers have arrived in the U.S. from Russia since the ban went into effect on March 8. And at present, there are at least six vessels en route from Russia to the U.S. that are due to arrive by mid-April. Somewhat poetically, the grace period ends on April 22: Earth Day.

In detailing when and where Russian oil tankers are moving, Greenpeace’s tracker gives the public a tool for holding the U.S. and other governments that have committed to banning Russian oil and gas to account.

“That’s a really important hypocrisy to highlight politically,” Georgia Whitaker, an oil campaigner at Greenpeace U.K., told Protocol. “Politicians are saying all the right things, but they’re not necessarily putting that into action. Every tanker that arrives is funding a war.”

The project, immortalized in a Twitter bot that updates automatically, relies on publicly available data from Marine Traffic API services. That data comes from ships’ onboard computers and tracking devices, and includes information on their identification, position and — crucially — destination.

According to Uhlmann, who leads Greenpeace U.K.’s data science team, the group began by compiling a short list of Russian oil and gas terminals. Using Marine Traffic’s API services, the team identifies vessels departing from those terminals every 15 minutes, and pulls position reports every two hours. While the project initially only monitored massive supertankers, in the last week it has expanded to include tankers that carry as little as 10,000 tons of oil. (To be clear, that’s still a lot of oil.)

Once the team pulls the data, it is then pushed to Twitter. The account’s pinned tweet notes that tracking supertankers is more inconsistent than tracking private jets, because “vessels leave ports without a destination, change destinations en route or simply wait at sea for orders.” However, Uhlmann said the organization has not noticed any major issues with the data so far.

Greenpeace also uses paid services, which include the Bloomberg Terminal and Refinitiv, to ascertain both the nature of a ship’s cargo and its final destination. However, Uhlmann noted in an emailed statement, “some of the commercial sources of data are prohibitively expensive as they are essentially purchased by financial markets professionals, which makes it harder for individual activists or small NGOs to get access to.”

While Greenpeace has often used data and technology in its past investigations, Uhlmann said the use of open-source or commercially available data in service of the organization’s activism has increased dramatically in the last several years. In doing so, the 50-year-old organization created a decidedly 21st century way of supplementing its on-the-ground activism.

The tracker is just two weeks old and remains in beta, but it has already aided action at sea, as well as at the docks where these supertankers arrive. Activists joined a dockworkers union and managed to divert a tanker that was coming into Sweden; Greenpeace has spoken with that same union about potentially going on strike if they are asked to unload any fossil fuels from Russia.

This week, Greenpeace activists protested the arrival of a Russian tanker in New York, ahead of the end of the grace period. In a similar effort, a group of Nordic activists paddled small boats and even swam to confront two supertankers coming from Russia and to call upon Europe to reject the imports of fossil fuels earlier this month.

The tracker could also play an increasingly important role in turning the politics more forcefully against Russian oil and gas. The U.S. and Canada are among the countries that have already banned imports. The U.K. has also announced a ban on oil imports from Russia, which it plans to phase in by the end of the 2022.

Meanwhile, the EU is grappling with how to deal with Russian oil and gas, which it’s heavily reliant on. On Thursday, the continent’s leaders debated whether to stop buying oil and gas from Russia. While they ultimately decided to hold off for now, support for doing so among European leaders is reportedly continuing to mount as the war in Ukraine continues to take a massive humanitarian toll.

However, Whitaker said that politicians have been wary of the immediate impacts of doing so. Fuel prices are already surging, and turning off the tap of Russian imports could stir more public upset without an alternative source of energy (or measures to reduce demand) at hand.

“My suspicion is that as time moves on — and as countries have implemented their own plans and found more domestic supply or found something from other countries outside of Russia — we may have a lot more leverage politically in using this tracker,” she said. Essentially, at a certain point, the benefits of cracking down on Russian fuel imports may outweigh the costs.

Whitaker hopes the move away from Russian fossil fuel imports as a consequence of the war encourages a transition to renewable energy, which she said is vital not only for addressing the climate crisis, but also “for peace and making sure that we're not reliant on countries with human rights abuses, or who have waged a war on a country without provocation.”

While that transition has been slow-going so far, the invasion of Ukraine has brought home the need to accelerate it. And with Greenpeace’s tracker and other tools like it, it never has never been so easy to monitor the flows of the fossil fuels both financing the war and standing in the way of the clean energy revolution.


US issues sweeping new rules on chip-tech exports to China

The Biden administration rolled out new, wide-ranging export controls on the chips and equipment U.S. companies are able to sell to China.

The Biden administration’s new controls on chip exports represent a significant shift in U.S. policy related to China.

Photo: Chen Zhonghao/Xinhua via Getty Images

The U.S. unveiled a set of new regulations Friday that aim to choke off China’s access to advanced chips, the tools necessary to manufacture years-old designs, and the service and support mechanisms needed to keep chip fabrication systems running smoothly.

On a briefing call with reporters Thursday, administration officials said the goal is to block the People’s Liberation Army and China’s domestic surveillance apparatus from gaining access to advanced computing capabilities that require the use of advanced semiconductors. The chips, tools, and software are helping China’s military, including aiding the development of weapons of mass destruction, according to the officials, who asked to remain anonymous to discuss the administration’s policies freely.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why CrowdStrike wants to be a broader enterprise IT player

The company, which grew from $1 billion in annual recurring revenue to $2 billion in just 18 months, is expanding deeper within the cybersecurity market and into the wider IT space as well.

CrowdStrike is well positioned at a time when CISOs are fed up with going to dozens of different vendors to meet their security needs.

Image: Protocol

CrowdStrike is finding massive traction in areas outside its core endpoint security products, setting up the company to become a major player in other key security segments such as identity protection as well as in IT categories beyond cybersecurity.

Already one of the biggest names in cybersecurity for the past decade, CrowdStrike now aspires to become a more important player in areas within the wider IT landscape such as data observability and IT operations, CrowdStrike co-founder and CEO George Kurtz told Protocol in a recent interview.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories