Climate

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gases

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court at sunset sits behind fencing. Police officers are seen in silhouette near the fences.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.


The court decided in a party-line 6-3 split to revoke the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Elena Kagan wrote the dissent from the court's liberal bloc. In her dissent, Kagan wrote that the "court appoints itself — instead of Congress or the expert agency — the decision-maker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening." More simply, David Pomerantz, executive director of the Energy and Policy Institute, called the decision a "tragedy."

"We've wasted so many years, [and] the task in front of us is so great with such dire consequences if we fail," he said. "We really do need every possible legal and policy lever at our disposal."

Now, one of those levers is stuck in the "off" position. The Supreme Court case that flipped it, West Virginia v. EPA, focused on the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The agency has been trying to do so ever since the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that it could, in fact, do that under the Clean Air Act.

The agency drafted the Clean Power Plan during the Obama years — only for it to be stayed by the Supreme Court and then scrapped by the Trump EPA, which then put forth much weaker regulations. The Biden administration has promised an "all of government approach" to address climate change, but the Supreme Court ruling is tying its hands in terms of how much it can do with a sector that produces 25% of the country's greenhouse gas pollution.

That leaves a yawning chasm, which could be filled a few different ways. Federal legislation could wind down fossil fuel use while also ramping up renewables and storage through a clean energy standard. That standard was initially part of the Build Back Better Act — and also one of the key pieces that made Sen. Joe Manchin reject the legislation in its entirety, so the odds of that happening are not great. (That 50 Senate Republicans have also not lifted a finger in support of those policies shouldn't go unmentioned.)

Still, there are a quite few other avenues to make a dent in power plant carbon pollution that don't involve the federal government. States such as California have been successful in crafting strong regulations to curb carbon pollution from power plants and other sources within their borders. Utilities themselves could also take on a bigger role in speeding up decarbonizing their own power mixes.

That's not how things have traditionally worked, but that's not to say they couldn't work that way going forward. A number of utilities have adopted net-zero plans, and conglomerate NextEra recently committed to reaching "real zero" — that is, zeroing out emissions without relying on offsets — by 2045. But relying on pinky swears does not a safe climate make.

"The big utilities have tended to be followers rather than leaders, taking their [cues] from their public utility commissions or FERC," Dan Farber, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said in an email. "As renewables and storage become dramatically cheaper, however, it's hard for the utilities to resist."

Pomerantz pointed to the power of public utility commissions, which exist as watchdogs to make sure utilities are operating in customers' best interests. With renewables competing as the cheapest way to generate power — especially with the recent spike in gas prices — it could mean those commissions increasingly consider climate-friendly options.

The tech industry is also an increasingly big player in the decarbonization space. A growing number of companies have said they plan to — or already do — source their electricity needs from renewables and are in the process of convincing companies that are part of their supply chains to do the same.

"The biggest contribution that tech sector can make is probably in its home territory: innovation," Farber said.

Investing in companies working on solar panels that soak up more sun, better batteries, improved transmission technology or homes that use less energy in the first place can help bring costs down further, creating a virtuous cycle. Pomerantz said the industry has another superpower, though: lobbying for climate policy.

"Part of why we got here, [to the] Supreme Court case, is a function of the political power of the fossil fuel industry," he said. "The court case was brought by Republican AGs who have been funded to do this exact thing by fossil fuel utilities, and oil, gas and coal companies for decades."

While he said campaign finance reform and other fixes needed to shore up democracy are absolutely vital as are everyday people staying engaged, "working within the system that we have, if tech companies are concerned about climate change as they purport to be, then they need to flex their own political power."

Correction: An earlier version of this story misspelled David Pomerantz's name. This story was updated on June 30, 2022.

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins