New SEC rules would require ESG funds to back up their claims

Tech and renewable energy companies could start looking like more attractive investments as a result of the changes.

Wall Street.

The SEC aims to require asset managers to provide more clarity, both by demanding solid proof of a fund’s ESG bona fides and by targeting fund names that are potentially deceptive.

Photo: Roberto Júnior via Unsplash

New SEC rules could make ESG funds abide by some standards, which would be refreshing given that the label that doesn’t have a whole lot of actual meaning at the moment.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) credentials in the U.S. are pretty much useless. The rating system for funds allows asset managers to essentially define the terms for themselves, which is why an oil and gas giant like Exxon Mobil can end up on the S&P 500 ESG list while an EV company like Tesla doesn't make the cut (because of its lack of a climate plan, among other issues). Elon Musk was pretty pissed, needless to say.

With two proposed rule changes this week, the SEC aims to require asset managers to provide more clarity, both by demanding solid proof of a fund’s ESG bona fides and by targeting fund names that are potentially deceptive.

“I think investors should be able to drill down to see what’s under the hood of these strategies,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement.

If the rules are finalized in something close to their current form, as experts anticipate they will be, it will be much more likely that a fund that self-describes as “green” or “sustainable” or “ESG” will actually have to prove it.

Steven Rothstein, who leads the Ceres Accelerator for Sustainable Capital Markets, said certain large tech companies and others that walk the ESG walk are likely to remain included in ESG funds, even as asset managers start taking a longer, harder look at their portfolios.

“Companies that are leaders in this area, that have a proven track record, that disclose more information: They will have more opportunities from investors to be considered for their fund,” Rothstein said.

While very few companies have flawless climate commitments, it is rare for a major tech company to have no plan at all. For this reason, Andrew Behar, CEO of shareholder advocacy group As You Sow, said that the SEC rules could be to the advantage of companies that have “coherent” climate plans and are more likely to fit the ESG bill. Smaller renewables companies could also benefit. If asset managers are required to choose between dropping an ESG label from their fund and dropping companies like Exxon, Behar said, Exxon will probably be on the chopping block.

“They're going to need to invest in something, so they’ll probably be investing in more renewable energy companies because they’re going to want to keep, whatever, 7-8% of their funds in energy,” he added.

The proposals come in light of widespread concerns about “greenwashing” in the ESG investment space. As sustainable investing gathers momentum — investments are set to hit roughly $50 trillion by 2025 — asset managers can slap the ESG label on funds that don’t necessarily have environmental, social and governance concerns at the center of their strategies. This is why fossil fuel corporations and other companies in similar industries sneak into ESG funds.

“I believe that we are heading toward some standardization of language, of glossary,” said Behar, noting that the European Union will also be putting out its own ESG definitions in the coming months.

And just two months ago, the SEC proposed rules to create a framework for how publicly traded companies report their emissions and climate pledges. The SEC’s latest move is a sign that it’s trying to impose some order on ESG investment and climate-related disclosures overall.

The new rules are open to public comment for 60 days, or until July 24.


Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories