Source Code: Your daily look at what matters in tech.

source-codesource codeauthorEmily BirnbaumNoneWant your finger on the pulse of everything that's happening in tech? Sign up to get David Pierce's daily newsletter.64fd3cbe9f
×

Get access to Protocol

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber
Politics

Five things US companies need to know about the new EU rules

It's going to be a long fight.

Five things US companies need to know about the new EU rules

"The two proposals serve one purpose: to make sure that we, as users, have access to a wide choice of safe products and services online," said Margrethe Vestager, executive vice president of the European Commission and the EU's digital czar.

Photo: Alexandros Michailidis/Getty Images

The European Union on Tuesday proposed a sweeping set of rules to rein in the power of Big Tech, amounting to the most aggressive legislative effort against the industry to date.

The Digital Services Act will require online intermediaries to act more swiftly against illegal content and provide users with more transparency around takedowns. The Digital Markets Act will restrict large companies, labeled "gatekeepers," from engaging in a set of anticompetitive behaviors, including self-preferencing.

"The two proposals serve one purpose: to make sure that we, as users, have access to a wide choice of safe products and services online," said Margrethe Vestager, executive vice president of the European Commission and the EU's digital czar. "This is one world … what is illegal offline is equally illegal online."

The proposals will likely send shockwaves through the global tech industry as companies seek to understand how they will be affected and whether they could run afoul of the rules.

Here's a list of five things U.S. companies should know about this fast-moving effort.

It could be years until these rules take effect.

Tuesday's announcement will kick off years of impassioned negotiations as policymakers and lobbyists work out the contours of the proposals, which are far from becoming law.

The EU took four years to debate the General Data Protection Regulation, and this process is likely to look similar, though it will pull in a smaller array of players because it targets tech specifically.

The European Council, which represents all 27 governments in the bloc, and the European Parliament must approve the pair of proposals before they become law.

Tech intends to fight hard.

Tech companies including Google, Facebook and Twitter have made it clear that they intend to fight hard to sway the direction of the rules. "We look forward to reviewing today's proposals in full, and continued collaboration with the EU Commission, industry and civil society in the coming weeks and months ahead," Twitter said.

Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft spent about $23 million on lobbying in the EU in the first half of 2019, according to Transparency International, a group that monitors lobbying in the bloc. Their efforts are only set to intensify as they seek to influence all 27 member-nations during the consultation period.

Companies are largely in favor of harmonizing rules across the EU, which will make it easier for them to navigate what they should and shouldn't do. But the proposals as written would subject the companies to potentially enormous fines and even breakups as a "nuclear option," in Vestager's words, a daunting prospect that they're certain to fight.

The Digital Markets Act in particular gets right at the heart of Big Tech's business models with a set of sweeping do's and don'ts. Under the DMA, the EU could force companies to open up their platforms in ways that they never have before, requiring firms to allow third parties to interoperate with their services and give users data about advertising and sales. For example, the proposal could force Amazon to share far more information with its sellers or require Facebook to provide extensive information on how its advertising is working.

It would also create a harsh set of don'ts. Under the DMA, companies like Google and Amazon could not give preference to their own services in search results, and Apple could not block users from removing preinstalled apps.

"While we will review the Commission's proposals carefully over the coming days, we are concerned that they appear to specifically target a handful of companies and make it harder to develop new products to support small businesses in Europe," said Karan Bhatia, vice president of government affairs and public policy at Google.

Taken together, it's likely that Big Tech will fight harder to stave off the most aggressive proposals in the DMA while smaller companies will spend more time on the Digital Services Act.

The Digital Services Act applies far more broadly than Digital Markets Act.

While the DMA is tailored specifically to "gatekeeper" companies, the Digital Services Act would apply to a much wider range of companies: "online intermediary services."

According to the European Commission, the DSA will apply in various ways to intermediary services offering network infrastructure, hosting services such as cloud services, smaller online platforms and the largest online platforms.

The proposal, which is aimed at improving mechanisms for the removal of illegal content, was written to create different requirements for different kinds of companies; for instance, a cloud company would have fewer obligations than a social media platform when it comes to handling content.

All of the companies will be required to provide much more transparency around what kinds of content they remove and why, one of the less controversial asks. They will have to come up with effective mechanisms for users to flag illegal content and will likely be required to allow users to challenge content moderation decisions. If they violate any of the new rules, they could face fines up to 6% of global revenues, a hefty sum.

Beyond that, the largest online platforms could have to submit to external risk auditing and give researchers access to key data.

Tech-funded organizations are already raising concerns about some elements of how the DSA applies to platforms. Iverna McGowan, director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Europe office, said there's some concern that the draft regulation could expose platforms to more liability for their content moderation decisions and disincentivize them from moderating harmful speech. "We fear that the draft regulation reflects fundamental inconsistencies which would risk undemocratic and discriminatory results," she said, pledging to work with the commission, parliament and council to "address these serious concerns before the proposal proceeds."

The rules could set the stage for global regulations just like GDPR.

Just as GDPR, the EU's far-reaching privacy framework, set the tone for global regulations after it was adopted in 2016, the EU's twin proposals will likely also become the standard that other legislative efforts are held against moving forward.

The U.S. is light-years behind the EU in regulation, and any legislation to emerge from Congress on content moderation or antitrust would be much less aggressive. But the EU's efforts will likely offer some helpful frameworks for U.S. policymakers, particularly its emphasis on "asymmetrical" rules, which apply differently to companies according to their size.

"The Digital Markets Act's emphasis on targeted, digital platform-specific regulations and clear rules of the road can be a model for U.S. policymakers," said Alex Petros, policy counsel at digital rights group Public Knowledge.

Elements of GDPR play a central role in negotiations around a federal privacy bill today, and experts predict there could be a similar effect with the DMA and DSA.

"This seems to be a continuation of … the EU using legislation to become a worldwide leader in tech regulation," said Christoph Schmon, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's international policy director.

Companies have to assess how the rules apply to them.

The new proposals will apply to all tech companies that offer their services in the EU, sweeping up a broad swath of U.S. firms beyond just Facebook and Google. Companies will be expected to decide how the rules apply to them on their own, turning to internal compliance and legal teams, with Brussels stepping in if they think businesses are not identifying themselves correctly. It's likely that many companies will try to avoid being included, particularly in the "gatekeeper" designation.

When it came to GDPR, some companies, like Facebook, created EU-specific privacy processes while others, like Microsoft, decided to change their protocols globally, exporting GDPR-like privacy protections to every country they operate in.

The DMA and DSA will likely set off a similar process as global firms decide whether they can afford to behave differently in the EU than they do in other countries.

There's some fear that the laws will disincentivize smaller companies from offering their services in the EU if the obligations turn out to be too costly, Schmon said. For instance, one provision of the Digital Services Act will require service providers to appoint a legal representative in the EU, a potentially burdensome requirement.

"We hope the future negotiations will seek to make the EU a leader in digital innovation, not just in digital regulation," said Christian Borggreen, the vice president for CCIA Europe, a tech trade group representing Google, Facebook and Amazon.

It's unlikely that most companies will make any sudden moves. Instead, the next chapter in this saga is likely to be defined by herculean lobbying efforts by companies big and small as they seek to influence the end result.

Protocol | Workplace

In Silicon Valley, it’s February 2020 all over again

"We'll reopen when it's right, but right now the world is changing too much."

Tech companies are handling the delta variant in differing ways.

Photo: alvarez/Getty Images

It's still 2021, right? Because frankly, it's starting to feel like March 2020 all over again.

Google, Apple, Uber and Lyft have now all told employees they won't have to come back to the office before October as COVID-19 case counts continue to tick back up. Facebook, Google and Uber are now requiring workers to get vaccinated before coming to the office, and Twitter — also requiring vaccines — went so far as to shut down its reopened offices on Wednesday, and put future office reopenings on hold.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

After a year and a half of living and working through a pandemic, it's no surprise that employees are sending out stress signals at record rates. According to a 2021 study by Indeed, 52% of employees today say they feel burnt out. Over half of employees report working longer hours, and a quarter say they're unable to unplug from work.

The continued swell of reported burnout is a concerning trend for employers everywhere. Not only does it harm mental health and well-being, but it can also impact absenteeism, employee retention and — between the drain on morale and high turnover — your company culture.

Crisis management is one thing, but how do you permanently lower the temperature so your teams can recover sustainably? Companies around the world are now taking larger steps to curb burnout, with industry leaders like LinkedIn, Hootsuite and Bumble shutting down their offices for a full week to allow all employees extra time off. The CEO of Okta, worried about burnout, asked all employees to email him their vacation plans in 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Stella Garber
Stella Garber is Trello's Head of Marketing. Stella has led Marketing at Trello for the last seven years from early stage startup all the way through its acquisition by Atlassian in 2017 and beyond. Stella was an early champion of remote work, having led remote teams for the last decade plus.
Protocol | China

Livestreaming ecommerce next battleground for China’s nationalists

Vendors for Nike and even Chinese brands were harassed for not donating enough to Henan.

Nationalists were trolling in the comment sections of livestream sessions selling products by Li-Ning, Adidas and other brands.

Collage: Weibo, Bilibili

The No. 1 rule of sales: Don't praise your competitor's product. Rule No. 2: When you are put to a loyalty test by nationalist trolls, forget the first rule.

While China continues to respond to the catastrophic flooding that has killed 99 and displaced 1.4 million people in the central province of Henan, a large group of trolls was busy doing something else: harassing ordinary sportswear sellers on China's livestream ecommerce platforms. Why? Because they determined that the brands being sold had donated too little, or too late, to the people impacted by floods.

Keep Reading Show less
Zeyi Yang
Zeyi Yang is a reporter with Protocol | China. Previously, he worked as a reporting fellow for the digital magazine Rest of World, covering the intersection of technology and culture in China and neighboring countries. He has also contributed to the South China Morning Post, Nikkei Asia, Columbia Journalism Review, among other publications. In his spare time, Zeyi co-founded a Mandarin podcast that tells LGBTQ stories in China. He has been playing Pokemon for 14 years and has a weird favorite pick.
Power

The video game industry is bracing for its Netflix and Spotify moment

Subscription gaming promises to upend gaming. The jury's out on whether that's a good thing.

It's not clear what might fall through the cracks if most of the biggest game studios transition away from selling individual games and instead embrace a mix of free-to-play and subscription bundling.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Subscription services are coming for the game industry, and the shift could shake up the largest and most lucrative entertainment sector in the world. These services started as small, closed offerings typically available on only a handful of hardware platforms. Now, they're expanding to mobile phones and smart TVs, and promising to radically change the economics of how games are funded, developed and distributed.

Of the biggest companies in gaming today, Amazon, Apple, Electronic Arts, Google, Microsoft, Nintendo, Nvidia, Sony and Ubisoft all operate some form of game subscription. Far and away the most ambitious of them is Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass, featuring more than 100 games for $9.99 a month and including even brand-new titles the day they release. As of January, Game Pass had more than 18 million subscribers, and Microsoft's aggressive investment in a subscription future has become a catalyst for an industrywide reckoning on the likelihood and viability of such a model becoming standard.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Protocol | Policy

Lina Khan wants to hear from you

The new FTC chair is trying to get herself, and the sometimes timid tech-regulating agency she oversees, up to speed while she still can.

Lina Khan is trying to push the FTC to corral tech companies

Photo: Graeme Jennings/AFP via Getty Images

"When you're in D.C., it's very easy to lose connection with the very real issues that people are facing," said Lina Khan, the FTC's new chair.

Khan made her debut as chair before the press on Wednesday, showing up to a media event carrying an old maroon book from the agency's library and calling herself a "huge nerd" on FTC history. She launched into explaining how much she enjoys the open commission meetings she's pioneered since taking over in June. That's especially true of the marathon public comment sessions that have wrapped up each of the two meetings so far.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories