Politics

Congress is unleashing the FTC on COVID-19 scammers

The second stimulus package will expand the FTC's authority to penalize companies promoting fake information and faulty products.

Congress is unleashing the FTC on COVID-19 scammers

The FTC will finally have the authority to immediately fine scammers touting fake COVID-19 treatments and lies about pandemic government benefits.

Photo: Al Drago/Getty Images

The FTC will finally have the authority to fine scammers touting fake COVID-19 treatments and lies about pandemic government benefits, thanks to new language in the economic stimulus package set to pass on Monday.

COVID-related scams proliferating online have overwhelmed government agencies and cost Americans more than $145 million since the beginning of the pandemic — and the FTC has been almost powerless to stop them, thanks to limitations on the agency's authority.

Now, the $900 billion coronavirus relief package is expected to include a provision enabling the FTC to penalize companies for promoting scams related to "the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation or means of diagnosis of COVID-19" and "promises related to COVID-19 government benefits," according to bill text. The provision will ensure the agency has expanded authority to fine the companies up to hundreds of thousands of dollars for their first offense and demand refunds for customers who wasted money or divulged sensitive personal information.

Social media companies have announced new policies to crack down on misinformation surrounding COVID-19, but their platforms still regularly host scams purporting to advertise cures and vaccine access. Fraudsters are already beginning to promote early access to the COVID-19 vaccine in WhatsApp groups, online ads and robocalls, according to Pfizer's chief security officer.

"Predators are using the pandemic to take advantage of people when they are afraid and vulnerable," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, who introduced the bill in the House. "The COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act gives the FTC the authority to go after COVID fraudsters and impose significant fines after the first offense. I'm glad we were able to include our bill in the COVID relief package. The FTC has long needed stronger tools to protect American consumers and deter bad actors during emergencies, and now it has them."

Health officials are bracing for a second spike in scams as the vaccine rolls out nationwide and Congress prepares to authorize a new round of stimulus payments. The new legislation won't go after platforms like Amazon for hosting bunk treatments, but it will give the government greater authority to go after the scammers themselves.

The FTC this year has sent more than 350 warning letters to companies and individuals it caught promoting false information and products about the pandemic, but lawmakers have criticized those efforts as toothless and limited. Warning letters don't get money back to consumers, and scammers can oftentimes launch new false campaigns under a different title. In response, the FTC asked for expanded civil penalty authority to after fraudsters.

"My view of the FTC is simple: You should be doing everything in your power to help Americans during this time of crisis," Sen. Maria Cantwell said during a hearing in August. "The COVID-19 pandemic has attracted bad actors and scam artists, including those who take advantage of people's fear and dire circumstances. We must move beyond warnings and threats in response to these unconscionable scams. We must see the FTC exercising real enforcement with real consequences to protect consumers and families when they are most vulnerable."

The COVID-19 Consumer Data Protection Act was originally introduced by Sen. Cantwell and co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Roger Wicker.

"Chairman Wicker is pleased to see this important measure included in the relief package," said a Senate Commerce Committee spokesperson. "The bill would protect consumers from scammers and other bad actors seeking to defraud them and exploit the pandemic for their own personal gain."

Cantwell also sought to include provisions cracking down on COVID-19 price-gouging in the latest relief package, but aides were unable to come to a consensus on that language, according to a Hill aide.

Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Policy

White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins