People

Zuckerberg's college buddy is leading Facebook's coronavirus response

As the company works to contain coronavirus misinformation, Facebook's head of health steps into the spotlight.

A face mask

The question is whether Kang-Xing Jin's team — and all of Facebook — will be able to crack down on the onslaught of coronavirus misinformation already coursing through its platforms.

Photo: Aleksandr Zubkov via Getty Images

About a year and a half ago, Kang-Xing Jin, one of Facebook's oldest employees and a friend of Mark Zuckerberg's from their Harvard days, stepped into the role of head of health for the company without much fanfare — or health experience to speak of. In that role, Jin, better known internally as "KX," has worked on developing health-related products like a blood donation tool and health support groups.

Now, Jin has a new and substantially weightier responsibility: helping Facebook stem the spread of misinformation about the coronavirus on its platforms and figuring out how to push accurate facts about the virus to its more than 2 billion global users.

Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.


Of all of the members of Zuckerberg's inner circle, Jin may be among the least well-known outside the company. Other early Facebookers, like the company's vice president of augmented reality and virtual reality, Andrew "Boz" Bosworth, and its former chief product officer, Chris Cox, have taken on prominent, public-facing roles. Jin, meanwhile, has risen through Facebook's ranks since 2006, working primarily on foundational products like News Feed and ads, without stepping into public view much.

But as the coronavirus crisis mounts, and Facebook properties like WhatsApp are overrun with fake cures and coronavirus conspiracies, that's beginning to change.

When Facebook announced the first steps in its plan to respond to the coronavirus in January, the message came from Jin. Weeks later, at a conference focused on technology and health, Jin appeared on stage to explain how Facebook envisions its role in addressing this crisis. "We need to help get people access to credible information from trusted sources the moment they're seeking it out. That's something we need to do in close partnership with the public sector," he said. "We're not the people who have that information. That actually really shouldn't be us."

Indeed, Jin has no medical background or expertise, a fact he readily admitted on stage. Like Zuckerberg, Jin studied computer science at Harvard and met the soon-to-be Facebook founder on their first day of class. As Zuckerberg told it in a 2016 Facebook post celebrating Jin's 10-year Facebook anniversary, "I had been up coding the night before, and in my exhaustion I walked into class with my shirt on inside out and backwards. KX was the only person who didn't think it was weird," Zuckerberg wrote. "He later told me he didn't even notice."

Jin was there the night Zuckerberg launched Facebook in 2004, and two years later, after graduating from Harvard, he immediately joined the team. "Over the years he's worked on almost everything we've built," Zuckerberg wrote. "He was on the team that built the first version of News Feed. He helped run our business and advertising services."

By 2017, Jin was working on Facebook's post-election 2016 mandate to foster community on the platform by focusing on groups. Through that work, a Facebook spokesperson says, Jin started noticing the way people were using Facebook groups to talk about health issues and even solicit blood donations.

"As somebody who's been working at the company for so long, he saw this trend happening," the Facebook spokesperson said. "It was something that we needed to focus on." Jin became head of health a year and a half ago, though if Facebook made a public announcement about it at the time, it certainly didn't cause much stir, and Protocol hasn't been able to find one. He now reports to Facebook's head of social good, Naomi Gleit, another Facebook lifer, who joined the company a year after it launched.

The Facebook spokesperson stressed that while Jin doesn't have medical experience, by virtue of his tenure at the company, he does have an intimate knowledge of the various teams working within Facebook that will be required to tackle this issue. "The purpose of the role isn't intended to be a health expert," the spokesperson said. "It's intended to be managerial, to pull people in and have a vision of how to work within the company."

In a Facebook post this week, Zuckerberg expanded on the company's strategy for dealing with the coronavirus, saying that Facebook is working closely with the World Health Organization, the Center for Disease Control, UNICEF, and various health ministries. That includes giving the WHO unlimited, free access to advertisements on Facebook.

This kind of partnership is key, says Joshua Sharfstein, vice dean of public health practice at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "I wouldn't expect each company to have its own health department, but they need to work closely with the CDC," he said. "Public health officials will know where the misinformation is causing the biggest problem. I think it's more about being willing to defer to the expertise."

Facebook is of course not alone in needing to deal with health information across a large platform. Twitter told Protocol that no one person at the company is heading this up, saying, "This is a company-wide effort and there are a range of teams working together on this that include Product, Trust & Safety, and Public Policy." Google and YouTube didn't respond to a specific question about who's leading their health information response. But Google did say it has health and crisis response teams "that have been working to surface authoritative information from WHO in existing features."

Related:

Facebook has hired some bona fide health experts in recent years. Roni Zeiger, a physician who was Google's chief health strategist for years, joined the company last year and now reports to Jin.

The question is whether Jin's team — and all of Facebook — will be able to crack down on the onslaught of coronavirus misinformation already coursing through its platforms. The company's record on controlling the spread of anti-vaccination propaganda is spotty at best, though Facebook has implemented some new tools to surface reliable information about vaccines over the last year. Still, those efforts have had varying levels of success on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. While a search for "vaccines" on Facebook brings up Facebook Pages for the CDC and WHO, the same search on Instagram still surfaces accounts called vaccines_are_toxic and vaccines_kill_. Instagram does, however, direct users to the CDC website via the coronavirus hashtag.

Already, the company appears to be having similar enforcement issues with regard to the coronavirus. While a search for "coronavirus" on Facebook brings up links from medical schools and the CDC, the same search on Instagram turns up an account with more than 86,000 followers called "coronaviruss," which has shared, among other things, a conspiracy theory about the virus being an extermination plot between the United States and Israel.

Get in touch with us: Share information securely with Protocol via encrypted Signal or WhatsApp message, at 415-214-4715 or through our anonymous SecureDrop.

The challenges ahead for Jin and his team are immense. Sharfstein stresses that the consequences of Facebook getting this response wrong are dire. "We know about the damage misinformation can do around vaccination," he says. "If these networks wind up amplifying misinformation, then a lot of people could be harmed or killed."

The Twitter account Elon Musk would pay to delete

‘I’ve put a lot of work into it, and $5k is just really not enough.’

Elon Musk considers the Twitter account a security risk.

Photoillustration: Brendan Smialowski/AFP and Getty Images Plus; Protocol

“Can you take this down? It is a security risk.”

That’s how Elon Musk opened a conversation with 19-year-old Jack Sweeney over Twitter DM last fall. He was referencing a Twitter account, called @ElonJet, which tracks the movements of his private jet around the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering breaking news. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.
Podcasts

In the metaverse, anyone can rock a Luigi mustache. Or be a rock.

Akash Nigam on the downsides of realistic avatars, self-expression and the metaverse’s booming fashion business.

Genies has made avatars for some A-list celebrities, but it wants everyone to have one.

Image: Genies

Who will you be in the metaverse? It’s both a surprisingly philosophical question and a potentially critical one for businesses everywhere, as they continue to design what virtual worlds look like and how we live inside of them.

Akash Nigam has been working on his answers for a while. As CEO of Genies, he’s worked with celebrities like Justin Bieber and Rihanna to create digital avatars they can use for album releases, commercial shoots and to generally be places they can’t physically go. Now, Genies is working on something much bigger: an open, decentralized avatar system that lets anyone build their own metaverse character, and then build a world around it.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Enterprise

Intel must spend $100B in Ohio now to avoid spending more later

Forget the politics. Here’s why Intel’s new factories in Ohio are crucial to the company’s future and its hope of regaining the chip manufacturing leadership spot.

Intel is doubling down on its own contract manufacturing business for fabless chipmakers.

Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

Intel’s plans to invest up to $100 billion in a new group of chip factories outside Columbus, Ohio, will have a much greater impact on the future of its manufacturing division compared to any short-term political or supply-chain concerns it might solve.

To hear President Joe Biden, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Ohio Governor Mike DeWine tell it, the new factories — known as fabs in this world — are going to help fix inflation, make the U.S. more competitive, drive down the soaring cost of cars, ease the chip supply-chain shocks and improve U.S. national security. That’s a lot, even for one of the biggest projects in Intel’s storied history. It will be years before that capacity comes online, and whether a new chip factory in Ohio could actually solve any or all of those issues is debatable.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Policy

The FTC's antitrust case against Meta could be great for privacy

When the FTC filed its antitrust case against Meta, many traditional competition lawyers said it couldn’t include privacy issues. The agency didn’t listen. Now, it’s winning.

The FTC may have found a surprising lever to get a handle on Big Tech’s data practices.

Photo: bpperry/Getty Images

Right after Thanksgiving in 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced it had caught Facebook in several lies about privacy occurring over the prior two years. The company, it said, had agreed to a settlement and would be making changes going forward to protect users’ data.

The agreement, to put it mildly, doesn’t seem to have gone as the FTC planned. One $5 billion fine for privacy abuses and an unending stream of scandals later, the FTC is in the middle of litigation with the company now known as Meta over alleged antitrust violations, which were long thought to belong to an entirely separate area of law.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins