People

Zuckerberg's college buddy is leading Facebook's coronavirus response

As the company works to contain coronavirus misinformation, Facebook's head of health steps into the spotlight.

A face mask

The question is whether Kang-Xing Jin's team — and all of Facebook — will be able to crack down on the onslaught of coronavirus misinformation already coursing through its platforms.

Photo: Aleksandr Zubkov via Getty Images

About a year and a half ago, Kang-Xing Jin, one of Facebook's oldest employees and a friend of Mark Zuckerberg's from their Harvard days, stepped into the role of head of health for the company without much fanfare — or health experience to speak of. In that role, Jin, better known internally as "KX," has worked on developing health-related products like a blood donation tool and health support groups.

Now, Jin has a new and substantially weightier responsibility: helping Facebook stem the spread of misinformation about the coronavirus on its platforms and figuring out how to push accurate facts about the virus to its more than 2 billion global users.

Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.


Of all of the members of Zuckerberg's inner circle, Jin may be among the least well-known outside the company. Other early Facebookers, like the company's vice president of augmented reality and virtual reality, Andrew "Boz" Bosworth, and its former chief product officer, Chris Cox, have taken on prominent, public-facing roles. Jin, meanwhile, has risen through Facebook's ranks since 2006, working primarily on foundational products like News Feed and ads, without stepping into public view much.

But as the coronavirus crisis mounts, and Facebook properties like WhatsApp are overrun with fake cures and coronavirus conspiracies, that's beginning to change.

When Facebook announced the first steps in its plan to respond to the coronavirus in January, the message came from Jin. Weeks later, at a conference focused on technology and health, Jin appeared on stage to explain how Facebook envisions its role in addressing this crisis. "We need to help get people access to credible information from trusted sources the moment they're seeking it out. That's something we need to do in close partnership with the public sector," he said. "We're not the people who have that information. That actually really shouldn't be us."

Indeed, Jin has no medical background or expertise, a fact he readily admitted on stage. Like Zuckerberg, Jin studied computer science at Harvard and met the soon-to-be Facebook founder on their first day of class. As Zuckerberg told it in a 2016 Facebook post celebrating Jin's 10-year Facebook anniversary, "I had been up coding the night before, and in my exhaustion I walked into class with my shirt on inside out and backwards. KX was the only person who didn't think it was weird," Zuckerberg wrote. "He later told me he didn't even notice."

Jin was there the night Zuckerberg launched Facebook in 2004, and two years later, after graduating from Harvard, he immediately joined the team. "Over the years he's worked on almost everything we've built," Zuckerberg wrote. "He was on the team that built the first version of News Feed. He helped run our business and advertising services."

By 2017, Jin was working on Facebook's post-election 2016 mandate to foster community on the platform by focusing on groups. Through that work, a Facebook spokesperson says, Jin started noticing the way people were using Facebook groups to talk about health issues and even solicit blood donations.

"As somebody who's been working at the company for so long, he saw this trend happening," the Facebook spokesperson said. "It was something that we needed to focus on." Jin became head of health a year and a half ago, though if Facebook made a public announcement about it at the time, it certainly didn't cause much stir, and Protocol hasn't been able to find one. He now reports to Facebook's head of social good, Naomi Gleit, another Facebook lifer, who joined the company a year after it launched.

The Facebook spokesperson stressed that while Jin doesn't have medical experience, by virtue of his tenure at the company, he does have an intimate knowledge of the various teams working within Facebook that will be required to tackle this issue. "The purpose of the role isn't intended to be a health expert," the spokesperson said. "It's intended to be managerial, to pull people in and have a vision of how to work within the company."

In a Facebook post this week, Zuckerberg expanded on the company's strategy for dealing with the coronavirus, saying that Facebook is working closely with the World Health Organization, the Center for Disease Control, UNICEF, and various health ministries. That includes giving the WHO unlimited, free access to advertisements on Facebook.

This kind of partnership is key, says Joshua Sharfstein, vice dean of public health practice at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "I wouldn't expect each company to have its own health department, but they need to work closely with the CDC," he said. "Public health officials will know where the misinformation is causing the biggest problem. I think it's more about being willing to defer to the expertise."

Facebook is of course not alone in needing to deal with health information across a large platform. Twitter told Protocol that no one person at the company is heading this up, saying, "This is a company-wide effort and there are a range of teams working together on this that include Product, Trust & Safety, and Public Policy." Google and YouTube didn't respond to a specific question about who's leading their health information response. But Google did say it has health and crisis response teams "that have been working to surface authoritative information from WHO in existing features."

Related:

Facebook has hired some bona fide health experts in recent years. Roni Zeiger, a physician who was Google's chief health strategist for years, joined the company last year and now reports to Jin.

The question is whether Jin's team — and all of Facebook — will be able to crack down on the onslaught of coronavirus misinformation already coursing through its platforms. The company's record on controlling the spread of anti-vaccination propaganda is spotty at best, though Facebook has implemented some new tools to surface reliable information about vaccines over the last year. Still, those efforts have had varying levels of success on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. While a search for "vaccines" on Facebook brings up Facebook Pages for the CDC and WHO, the same search on Instagram still surfaces accounts called vaccines_are_toxic and vaccines_kill_. Instagram does, however, direct users to the CDC website via the coronavirus hashtag.

Already, the company appears to be having similar enforcement issues with regard to the coronavirus. While a search for "coronavirus" on Facebook brings up links from medical schools and the CDC, the same search on Instagram turns up an account with more than 86,000 followers called "coronaviruss," which has shared, among other things, a conspiracy theory about the virus being an extermination plot between the United States and Israel.

Get in touch with us: Share information securely with Protocol via encrypted Signal or WhatsApp message, at 415-214-4715 or through our anonymous SecureDrop.

The challenges ahead for Jin and his team are immense. Sharfstein stresses that the consequences of Facebook getting this response wrong are dire. "We know about the damage misinformation can do around vaccination," he says. "If these networks wind up amplifying misinformation, then a lot of people could be harmed or killed."

Power

How the creators of Spligate built gaming’s newest unicorn

1047 Games is now valued at $1.5 billion after three rounds of funding since May.

1047 Games' Splitgate amassed 13 million downloads when its beta launched in July.

Image: 1047 Games

The creators of Splitgate had a problem. Their new free-to-play video game, a take on the legendary arena shooter Halo with a teleportation twist borrowed from Valve's Portal, was gaining steam during its open beta period in July. But it was happening too quickly.

Splitgate was growing so fast and unexpectedly that the entire game was starting to break, as the servers supporting the game began to, figuratively speaking, melt down. The game went from fewer than 1,000 people playing it at any given moment in time to suddenly having tens of thousands of concurrent players. Then it grew to hundreds of thousands of players, all trying to log in and play at once across PlayStation, Xbox and PC.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,Checkout.com

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at Checkout.com. He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Latest Stories