Power

No time for denial: Shift CEO furloughs staff and warns others not to wait

"You've got to move decisively. This is when it really matters. You do not have 45 days to go through the stages of grief."

George Arison, CEO of Shift

George Arison, CEO of Shift, warns other founders: "There's no sacred cow in this kind of scenario. The sooner you move, the better off you'll be."

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

George Arison started planning as he saw coronavirus begin to spread outside of China: What would happen if his car sales startup Shift lost 15% of its revenue? Or 50%? What if it had to cease operations entirely?

In the last week, those models became reality. On Friday, Arison, Shift's co-CEO, broke the news to his San Francisco-based company over Zoom that all of its nearly 130 salaried employees would have to take a 25% pay cut. Some are being furloughed. Between 30% and 50% of Shift's around 250-person operations team, who work on the ground in West Coast cities, would be put on furlough. Others will have their work hours reduced. No one at the company will be unaffected.

Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.

"What you're doing to people is really painful because you're hurting people who most need capital right now, right? And that just really, really sucks," he said. "I didn't sleep probably one solid night of sleep in the last 10 days until this weekend because it was so horrible to do."

Arison is not alone in having to make tough choices when it comes to his business — and fast. In the last week, hundreds of startup workers have been laid off or furloughed. Real estate firm Compass cut 15%, or around 375 employees, from its workforce. Online cannabis startup Leafly laid off 91. Hospitality startup Sonder did a mix of furloughs and layoffs when it trimmed over 400 employees, or nearly a third of its workforce. TripActions on Tuesday laid off a reported 350 employees.

"There are very few companies where they have a choice in not doing this. Very, very few," Arison said.

While some companies have taken swift action, most startups founders Arison has spoken to are still just trying to wrap their heads around how fast the market has changed in the last two weeks. "A lot of them are kind of going through the four stages of grief, which is that now they're in a state of denial," he said. "My advice would be: You've got to move decisively. This is when it really matters. You do not have 45 days to go through the stages of grief."

As he was watching COVID-19 drive people indoors and away from public places, Arison knew that Shift was in a less-than-ideal spot. The startup helps people buy and sell cars online, arranging for things like inspections and driving used cars to people's front doors for test-drives.

In the wake of COVID-19, Shift moved its business to doing no-contact test-drives (where they wipe down the car and its keys before someone can take it for a spin) and it closed all of its physical hubs. During uncertain economic times, it's unlikely many people are racing to buy a car like they used to.

In the past six years, his company has raised over $300 million in a mix of equity and debt from backers like Goldman Sachs and Draper Fisher Jurvetson. Still, before all this, Arison had been planning to fundraise sometime this spring or summer in a pre-IPO round involving larger public market investors.

Now, fundraising isn't really an option.

It's become a matter of managing his startup's runway, or how many months it can survive without needing more cash. "Basically, we cannot afford — because we have limited runway — to lose any runway," he said. "If anything, we have to gain time."

Instead of laying off staff, Arison decided on a mix of staff salary cuts and furloughing employees to start. Shift has hubs only in California and Oregon, where furloughed workers may apply for some unemployment benefits. The decision keeps employees covered under Shift's health care plans — a big priority for Arison and his co-CEO, Toby Russell. To help make up some of the difference, Shift accelerated its stock investing plans so employees earn stock at double the rate. Assuming the startup raises at least $100 million later this year or early 2021, Arison plans to pay back the salary deferral.

The question for all startup CEOs: Will it be enough?

Arison says this will be sufficient to keep Shift afloat for right now. But the long term is anyone's guess. Who knows how long life will be disrupted this way? In this uncertainty, Arison warns that founders can't wait until it's too late.

"There's no sacred cow in this kind of scenario," he warned. "The sooner you move, the better off you'll be."

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins