People

Celebration, tension as coronavirus aid extended to gig workers

Uber's CEO cheered the proposal, while a critic of the company's labor strategy said, "I assume the taxpayers pick up the tab."

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi successfully lobbied the federal government to include Uber drivers in a stimulus package.

Photo: Samyukta Lakshmi/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Al Aloudi, who for years has driven for Uber and Lyft in San Francisco, stopped about two weeks ago — not only because few people were requesting rides, but because his parents and four young children live with him. He was afraid he would bring home the potentially deadly coronavirus. For a week, he tried delivering pizza, figuring the job included the least amount of contact with other people, but found he was making just $65 to $70 over eight hours of work.

"When I go home, I change all my clothes and take a shower," he said Thursday. "I'm scared of something happening to them. … It's not worth it right now."

Ride-hailing drivers and other gig-economy workers hit hard by the COVID-19 crisis could soon see relief under a federal stimulus package, expected to pass as soon as Friday, that extends unemployment insurance benefits to independent workers who would not normally qualify. But it remains unclear exactly how drivers like Aloudi will be treated, how much they would receive, and how that affects companies like Uber and Lyft.


Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.


Under the CARES Act, passed by the Senate late Wednesday, people who are unemployed, underemployed or unable to work because of coronavirus would receive $600 a week for up to four months, in addition to state unemployment benefits. In California — where a new, disputed law aims to classify gig workers as employees — that amounts to 60% to 70% of weekly wages, or $50 to $1,300 a week.

The inclusion of contract workers in the federal proposal brought some immediate celebration, along with confusion and tension, some rooted in ongoing clashes over whether Uber, Lyft and others should be allowed to continue classifying drivers as nonemployees.

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi cheered the move in a tweet: "Thanks to the Senate for supporting 1.3M @Uber drivers & delivery people. Many independent workers are on the frontlines; all deserve support. Hope the House will act on this bill & govt will join our push for new laws permitting cos like @Uber to provide new benefits going fwd."

Khosrowshahi had sent a letter Monday to the president and congressional leaders asking that drivers, who are independent contractors with no sick pay or health benefits, and who have found little work amid a widespread lockdown on nonessential activity, be included in the stimulus package.

Aloudi, who organizes other drivers for Rideshare Drivers United, scoffed at the CEO's tweet. "He has no hand in this," he said. "[Khosrowshahi] is making himself a speaker on behalf of drivers. It's so sad for me as a driver fighting since 2015 to get our rights."

He noted that Uber, Lyft and other gig companies are fighting California's Assembly Bill 5 by spending at least $90 million on a campaign to bring the issue before state voters in November. The companies are proposing what Khosrowshahi has called a "third way," the creation of a new work category that would give drivers some new protections but not classify them as employees eligible for things like sick pay and unemployment insurance.

Lyft also applauded the Senate passage. "Lyft has consistently advocated for stimulus that helps people, not companies, and we urge swift House passage of this bill," Chief Policy Officer Anthony Foxx said in a statement. "This will help the vast majority of people who drive with Lyft, most of whom have regular full- or part-time jobs and drive in their spare time."

Uber, Lyft and other gig-economy companies do not pay into an unemployment insurance fund for their drivers and delivery workers, as they do for their employees.

The author of AB 5, California Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, said that "Uber and its CEO should be ashamed of themselves. They were recently bragging to their investors how many billions of dollars in cash they had, yet they have left their drivers high and dry. It's unbelievable that they are having taxpayers bail them out during these unprecedented times."



Get in touch with us: Share information securely with Protocol via encrypted Signal or WhatsApp message, at 415-214-4715 or through our anonymous SecureDrop.


Catherine Fisk, a UC Berkeley law professor who writes and teaches about employment law and has been critical of the companies' position, said Thursday that the unemployment insurance system "is supposed to be funded, in part, by payroll taxes. I have no idea how the system works when there are large numbers of misclassified workers who are eligible for benefits. I assume the taxpayers pick up the tab."

It's possible that companies may be forced to pay down the road. States seeking to classify drivers as employees, like California under AB 5, can try to recoup unemployment insurance costs from gig-economy firms, said Veena Dubal, a UC Hastings associate professor of law who helps drivers organize. But she said she is concerned that the stimulus package as written "incentivizes states to go along with misclassification (of gig workers) to get short-term federal funds."

"In the long term, if workers are considered independent contractors, they will not be able to get unemployment insurance in a non-disaster context," Dubal said.

Nicole Moore, a driver organizer in Los Angeles, said Thursday she was getting "a bazillion questions" from drivers about the stimulus package. She has been telling them that even without it, they should qualify for state unemployment benefits because of AB 5, which went into effect at the beginning of the year.

"We are already eligible for unemployment even though our employers do not follow the law," she said.

The stimulus package now goes to the House, and President Trump has indicated his support.

This story was updated on March 26, 2020.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins