School in the metaverse: How tech and the pandemic are changing online education

Coursera’s CEO and chief content officer see a future of learning that’s more on-demand, more personalized and more immersive.

Person holding a smartphone

There’s a real possibility of lasting change and improvement in education.

Photo: Coursera

Nothing about the state of education feels “normal” right now. If you’re a parent, you’re trying to navigate hybrid learning, keeping up with medical advice, dealing with an onslaught of omicron and trying to make sure your kids keep up through it all. And if you’re an adult, you’re looking for new ways to keep up in a world where every technology, every system, every tool and every job’s basic requirements seem to change all the time.

But in the midst of all that upheaval, there’s a real possibility of lasting change and improvement in education. “We know, broadly, that learning will become more available, it’ll be more online, and there’ll be a lot more people learning for a lot more of their lives,” said Coursera CEO Jeff Maggioncalda. Coursera is focused on adult learning rather than the K-12 set, but is still grappling with many of the same questions about the future of learning, and how to take digital education far beyond just a recording of a lecture hall.

Maggioncalda and Coursera Chief Content Officer Betty Vandenbosch joined the Source Code podcast to talk about the chaotic state of online education, what’s next for corporate training, how softer skills are becoming part of the work curriculum, how learning might work in the metaverse and much more.

You can hear our full conversation on the latest episode of the Source Code podcast, or by clicking on the player above. Below are excerpts from our conversation, edited for length and clarity.

Subscribe to the show: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Overcast | Pocket Casts

It seems like everything about education, online and off, is in total chaos. Nobody knows anything about how this is all going to shake out. People don't know where they're going to go to school tomorrow. They don't know how virtual learning is supposed to work. Now we're talking about the metaverse — maybe the future of school is Roblox! — and I'm curious, as you think about both building the Coursera platform and building the courses themselves, do you come into this with an opinion on what the future looks like? Or is the job to just provide a platform for lots of these different institutions to do whatever they think is best?

Jeff Maggioncalda: I think it's a blend. There are very broad strokes where you have to say, “Let's see, what will the future look like?” We don't know exactly. But we know there's going to be a lot more adults learning throughout their lives than before. Well, why is that true? Because the world is changing faster than it's ever changed before. Technology and globalization are just changing the nature of business, the nature of jobs, the skills that people need to know, the tools that people need to know. There's a bigger imperative to be successful in your career, to learn things. And so older people have to learn things, you have to learn things throughout your whole life.

Not everyone's going to go back to campus; people are going to be doing more learning online, especially adults. We know, broadly, that learning will become more available, it'll be more online, and there'll be a lot more people learning for a lot more of their lives.

We also believe that credentials will become more important, not less, because it's hard to know who knows what. Institutions will play a big role. And if there’s anything that we've learned from technology, it’s that technology will radically change the way that we learn, the way that we work, where we learn, where we work. So I think there's going to be an incredible explosion of opportunity in the future that we just didn't see so much in the past.

Betty Vandenbosch: I think we set the table, we have a platform and we have ideas. We have lots of ideas. And our partners have ideas as well. And we come together to figure out what we might try, what might work, what might not work. And it's really the connection with the thousands of people who are faculty at our university partnerships, and the incredible creativity of our industry partnerships like Google and IBM and Microsoft and Facebook. But it's ultimately the learners who tell us, because they either do it or they don't.

For me, there’s not going to be one answer. I think 25 years ago, there was one answer, “this is the way you go to school.” Those days are gone, and they're not coming back. And the sooner we all recognize that there are a lot of ways to become educated, the sooner we'll be more creative and come up with a lot of ways to become educated that fit more precisely the needs of the people who need that education.

The average MOOC is basically just a recording of a lecture hall. And the cool thing about it was that it was accessible to people who were not in that lecture hall. And over time, we've added some things: Coursera has quizzes and readings and there's some more of these interactive elements. But it seems to me that we must be at the very beginning of figuring out all the different ways to make this stuff interactive and personalized, and rethinking what it actually means to teach and learn in a digital space. Is there cool stuff happening that I'm not seeing? Are we at the very beginning of something exciting?

BV: If we're working from one to 100, we're at about three.

We now have guided projects, which enable someone to — without having to download or do any of that complicated stuff — just watch a faculty member, and then try it themselves using a product. The product can be Excel, it could be Python, it can be anything. And that's all done in a web browser.

But we have only touched the surface in terms of putting projects together that use AI to see whether or not you're doing a good job. There's the metaverse: We have currently no courses using the metaverse, but that doesn't mean we're not going to! And we’re just getting started.

In terms of what makes good pedagogy, the pandemic did online education a huge, huge disservice. Because everybody thought, “If I put up a camera, I'm teaching online.” Wrong. We've got a report about the elements of quality in online education, and 45 minutes in front of a camera isn't it. It has to do with frequent interactions, frequent connections. And for the learner, it means you have to try every day, not just say, “I'm going to work for four hours on Tuesday and that'll be it.” So I think, truly, we're just getting started. And what's holding us back is enough time to try all these fabulous new ideas.

JM: I'll just give you one little example of how radically things could change. To your point, phase one of doing MOOCs — these massively open online courses — there was a lot of doing a new version of a lecture in a lecture hall. Betty mentioned big phase two, which is all the hands-on learning: How do you take the knowledge and use tools to apply that knowledge to build a project?

There’s a growing emergence of collaborative learning that's happening in online spaces with group projects, virtual reality, presence with other people that you're learning with. You’ve got a lot of VR and AR stuff coming, but even the beginnings of something that's way more basic than AR and VR: If you think about training nurses and doctors, generally you do clinical training, where like seven students will walk through the halls of the hospital, they'll walk into a patient's room, they'll all stand against the wall, watch a doctor talk to the patient, and then they'll all walk out and talk about it. We see people right now working on things where the doctor has a lens on her glasses. It also has a microphone, and the students are virtually in the room, but literally seeing through the same eyes as the doctor. And the students can talk to the patient via the speaker in the professor's glasses.

Today we could train maybe five to 10 students per doctor, but you'll be able to train 100 students per doctor, 1,000 students per doctor, to the extent that they can all walk into that patient's room and have that kind of experience. And this is not super fancy technology. It's a really creative application of technology to a highly constrained problem, which is preventing us from having enough nurses and doctors in the world.

If you want to learn how to do something on the internet, the options are endless. And if I want to do something like fix a tire, that's not necessarily something I would think immediately to go to Coursera for. That’s YouTube’s job, or WikiHow’s job. So as you think about what it means to be a learner online, is there a box around where you see Coursera’s job in that? Are you thinking more about careers and jobs rather than specific tasks?

JM: We're squarely focused on adult learning. We're not going after K-12, we think there's a lot of differences in that market that we're not going to be so good at. And then in terms of WikiHow and YouTube? We're all learners on the internet, we're all doing online learning, I would say especially for tasks that don't require a lot of prerequisite knowledge or conceptual understanding. There's a lot of task-oriented learning that we're all doing all the time that's very easy to consume. And there's a lot of competition.

Where we really focus more is on the longer, credentialed learning that's focused more on career. So helping adults learn the conceptual knowledge and applied skills to become more proficient at a career.

BV: But there's another part to career that I think is really important for us to acknowledge. And that is that a career is bigger than a skill. We definitely teach career skills, but we also teach how to be in a career. We have a really important course on English for business people. We have courses on social impact, and what you need to do in the areas of DEI in your organization. How do you think about managing folks? What is emotional intelligence?

One of our most popular courses is The Science of Well-Being. You’d think that's not a business course, that's not a career course. But I'm here to tell you that if your employees are happy, you will be more successful. And so to say, it’s skills — well, it is, but it's career writ large, not just “if I know how to program I can get a job.” And I think that's really, really important as well.

Speaking of the Science of Well-Being Class: That is everybody's canonical example of a smash hit Coursera class. What are the things that people should be learning from courses like that, about why they worked so well? Are there other classes out there in the Coursera curriculum that are emblematic of things being done really well?

BV: So what makes a blockbuster? There is some science, and there's lots of art. Courses that do well on Coursera are courses that have an immediate applicability to people's lives. They are courses that are taught by really good instructors. A course that does 4.8 out of 5 does much better than a course that does 4.5.

And also, it's courses that people stay connected to. One of the reasons that The Science of Well-Being does so well is because it asks you to reflect on yourself. Who doesn't want to think about themselves? There are others, too, that help you in a way that you might not expect right off the bat. Another course that's really, really powerful is Learning How to Learn, because that's helping you do all your other courses better.

If you're a faculty member and you say, “Well, I want a course that’s a blockbuster,” chances are you're not going to get one unless you have the passion for your topic. You recognize how your topic will help people right away, you have an immediate return for them either personally or professionally. And you're a really good teacher. So those are the three things I think that are the most important.

Super easy, totally simple stuff.

BV: Well, I said blockbuster! We have really good courses, but I'm just talking about the “oh my gosh” courses.

We have a lot of listeners who are running teams in the tech industry, trying to figure out how to reskill and retrain and up-level a lot of their workers. So I'm curious: When you start working with a company like Google, what do companies like that want from Coursera? Like a company like Google obviously has lots of resources, they're invested in lots of online education stuff. What do they come to you for?

JM: I would say a few things. First, a lot of companies — and I'm not saying Google's in this position, actually Google's is very advanced — but there's some businesses who say, “We’ve got to do digital transformation, and that means that we have to have a culture of learning. That means we’ve got to provide some education for people.” When you get a little bit more advanced, the question I like to ask — which is a very, very simple question, but a lot of people don't really have a very clear answer — is, who needs which skills at your company?

Are you trying to teach your financial planning and analysis people how to do SQL? Are you trying to develop some of your data scientists to be able to program in Python? Are you trying to teach your software engineers the art of machine learning and predictive algorithms? Where is the real benefit that you need to be driving strategically?

Then what we can say is, OK, for those types of jobs, here are the most important skills to do that job at the state of the art. We have a pretty good sense of the really hot jobs that are changing the fastest — here are the skills that people need to be learning in those jobs. And then not only can we teach the skills, but we can allow a manager to benchmark their employees against other employees in the same job so that the skillsets let you say, this is a reference set of skills and proficiency is for this job based on actual empirical evidence from other companies.

Once your employees start taking those, you can benchmark it. And even before they start taking the courses, you can do something we just launched in November called “LevelSets,” where you could do a quick diagnostic to see, OK, how well do my marketers understand social media marketing? Or how well do my finance people understand SQL? You can do diagnostics that help really figure out who knows what, and what's the gap that they need to close in order to do this job at the cutting edge.

You have to each give me an underrated, super cool Coursera course that people should check out — that isn't The Science of Well-Being, because everybody knows that — and then I will let you go. Jeff, you go first.

JM: The one I just finished is called Big History, from the University of Amsterdam. It goes from the Big Bang and quantum physics, up to how AI will impact the future of humanity. And in between, it talks about evolution, it talks about cosmology, it talks about climate change.

BV: The course that I recommend the most often is one on emotional intelligence. And it comes from Case Western Reserve University. The basic premise is you have to know yourself before you can know someone else, you have to manage yourself before you can manage someone else. And while that seems pretty simple, it's not. And when people recognize that, and recognize that they have to fix themselves before they can start bossing other people around, it just improves their abilities to lead immeasurably. So that's my favorite course.


How 'Dan from HR' became TikTok’s favorite career coach

You can get a lot of advice about corporate America on TikTok. ‘Dan from HR’ wants to make sure you’re getting the right instruction.

'Dan from HR' has posted hundreds of videos on his TikTok account about everything from cover letters to compensation.

Image: Dan Space

Daniel Space downloaded TikTok for the same reason most of us did. He was bored.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Space wanted to connect with his younger cousin, who uses TikTok, so he thought he’d get on the platform and try it out (although he refused to do any of the dances). Eventually, the algorithm figured out that Space is a longtime HR professional and fed him a post with resume tips — the only issue was that the advice was “really horrible,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a reporter and producer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) where she contributes to Source Code, Protocol's daily newsletter. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

1Password's CEO is ready for a password-free future

Fresh off a $620 million raise, 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner talks about the future of passwords.

1Password is a password manager, but it has plans to be even more.

Business is booming for 1Password. The company just announced it has raised $620 million, at a valuation of $6.8 billion, from a roster of A-list celebrities and well-known venture capitalists.

But what does a password manager need with $620 million? Jeff Shiner, 1Password’s CEO, has some plans. He’s building the team fast — 1Password has tripled in size in the last two years, up to 500 employees, and plans to double again this year — while also expanding the vision of what a password manager can do. 1Password has long been a consumer-first product, but the biggest opportunity lies in bringing the company’s knowhow, its user experience, and its security chops into the business world. 1Password already has more than 100,000 business customers, and it plans to expand fast.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Biden wants to digitize the government. Can these techies deliver?

A December executive order requires federal agencies to overhaul clunky systems. Meet the team trying to make that happen.

The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful.

Photo: Joe Daniel Price/Getty Images

Early last year, top White House officials embarked on a fact-finding mission with technical leaders inside government agencies. They wanted to know the answer to a specific question: If there was anything federal agencies could do to improve the average American’s experience interacting with the government, what would it be?

The list, of course, was a long one.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


5 takeaways from Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition

Microsoft just bought one of the world’s largest third-party game publishers. What now?

The nearly $70 billion acquisition gives Microsoft access to some of the most valuable brands in gaming.

Image: Microsoft Gaming

Just one week after Take-Two took the crown for biggest-ever industry acquisition, Microsoft strolled in Tuesday morning and dropped arguably the most monumental gaming news bombshell in years with its purchase of Activision Blizzard. The deal, at nearly $70 billion in all cash, dwarfs Take-Two’s purchase of Zynga, and it stands to reshape gaming as we know it.

The deal raises a number of pressing questions about the future of Activision Blizzard’s workplace culture issues, exclusivity in the game industry and whether such massive consolidation may trigger a regulatory response. None of these may be easily answered anytime soon, as the deal could take up to 18 months to close. But the question marks hanging over Activision Blizzard will loom large in the industry for the foreseeable future as Microsoft navigates its new role as one of the three largest game makers on the planet.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at
Latest Stories