From Compaq Center to Crypto.com Arena, here’s why companies take big swings on arena naming rights

Want to know how the tech industry's doing? Just look at who's naming stadiums.

A render of the future Crypto.com Arena

The deal is only the latest of Crypto.com's spending spree that includes deals with sports entities like UFC, Formula 1 and the Philadelphia 76ers.

Image: Crypto.com

Any tech company can advertise on a billboard over the freeway or put up a digital ad while you scroll through a website. But some go above and beyond to make sure they're seen.

From Lumen Field to Vivint Arena, tech companies have long been obsessed with making their branding a part of city skylines. A tech company plastering its name on an arena is a quick way to skyrocket brand awareness, differentiating itself from its competitors and helping it "stand out in the digital marketplace," said EJ Narcise, co-founder and principal of sports marketing and consulting company Team Services LLC. These deals also give companies access to hospitality perks such as concert and sporting event tickets for clients, fans or themselves, he said.

But historically, stadium namesakes have been a bad omen for tech companies. A prime example of this is Enron, the scandalous energy company which took over the name of The Ballpark at Union Station in Houston between 2000 and 2002. The company collapsed after declaring bankruptcy in December of 2001, and the stadium was briefly renamed Astros Field in February of 2002 before Coca-Cola bought the naming rights to it in June of that year, making it Minute Maid Park.

You can practically track the ups and downs of the tech industry by the names on arenas around the U.S. As the first dot-com bubble burst, so did the brief tenures of PSINet Stadium (now known as M&T Bank Stadium) and CMGI Field (now Gillette Stadium). 2002 also marked the end of the seven years 3Com's logo spent displayed on the former Candlestick Park. Adelphia Coliseum, now known as Nissan Stadium, lost its naming rights the same year after missing a required payment and filing for bankruptcy.

But despite the fact that companies often collapse after attaching their names onto sports stadiums, Narcise claims there is no correlation between the two. "That would be like saying a company failed because they bought, you know, a huge ad campaign or they did Super bowl commercials," Narcise said. "There's no direct correlation to a naming rights deal, and a company fails for a lot of reasons. Wasn't because they did a naming rights deal."

Photo: Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images

Not to be confused with the energy drink, Monster Cable got the naming rights of Candlestick Park in 2004.

Tech companies obviously don't see a correlation either. Many are hopeful that they'll end up reaping the benefits of having their name in lights. The latest buyer is Crypto.com, which announced a 20-year deal to take over the naming rights of the Staples Center in Los Angeles. The startup is paying a historic $700 million over 20 years, or $35 million annually, for the naming rights to the building, the Associated Press reported.

"Known as the Creative Capital of the World, the city of Los Angeles and the people who call it home have always been pioneers, pushing the boundaries and innovating as the undeniable global leaders of culture and entertainment," Crypto.com co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek said in the announcement. (Crypto.com did not respond immediately to additional requests for comment.)

The Crypto.com deal is "almost double" any other naming rights agreement, Narcise said, making it the largest deal of its kind in the U.S. "by far." Jeff Bezos, by comparison, spent just $400 million for the naming rights to the Climate Pledge Arena, formerly known as KeyArena.

LA being a hub for the entertainment industry and a city with high-powered sports teams likely contributed to the deal's unusually high price tag, he said. "It's no different than real estate: its location, location," Narcise said. "But it's also the building itself and the events that are driven there. Plus right now, you'll have LeBron James there for the foreseeable future."

The deal is only the latest of Crypto.com's spending spree. The five-year-old startup has struck sponsorship agreements worth hundreds of millions with sports and competition teams such as Formula 1, UFC and the Philadelphia 76ers in the past year. "If you want to reach several billions of people, sports is the way to go," Marszalek told the Wall Street Journal. "Our objective is to be, in the next three to five years, one of the top 20 consumer brands alongside Nike or Apple."

And Crypto.com isn't even the only blockchain company dropping major cash on brand deals. In March, FTX Trading was approved by the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners to attach its name to the former American Airlines Arena, home to the NBA's Miami Heat. The 19-year deal was worth $135 million, or $7 million annually.

If history is any guide, some of those names won't last the full length of their deals. For that matter, some of the companies may not make it that long. But in a crypto market that continues to boom across practically every company and industry and has become a cultural force in its own right, it seems appropriate that the most successful startups in the space are spending big on stadium names. Someday soon, we'll all be going to concerts at Dogecoin Stadium, and it might even feel normal. For a while.

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins