Protocol | Fintech

Regulators are going after payments for stock orders. What about crypto?

The SEC is concerned about payment for order flow in stocks and options. But crypto, which it is struggling to regulate, is a "Wild West."

Bitcoin illustration

What are you paying for your bitcoin?

Illustration: Jeremy Bezanger / Unsplash

Two of the SEC's major concerns are payment for order flow, the potentially conflict-ridden system where retail brokers get paid by market makers for sending them orders, and cryptocurrencies, the largely unregulated digital tokens that are generating a booming market in speculative trading.

What if you put them together?

That's not a hypothetical question: Robinhood, the online broker that recently went public, is already making more money from crypto payment for order flow than any other source.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has said the agency is scrutinizing payment for order flow, a decades-old business model that is used by large brokers like Schwab and TD Ameritrade but that Robinhood has finessed into profitable perfection. Regulators are considering all options including a ban on such arrangements, with Gensler noting that conflicts are "inherent" in a system where market makers pay retail brokers for directing trades to them, in effect splitting profits that come at investors' expense.

Cryptocurrencies were designed for peer-to-peer transactions, bypassing middlemen and marketplaces. But marketplaces have arisen nonetheless, facilitating buying and selling much like stock and currency markets do. And Robinhood, in particular, is championing the idea of extending the payment for order flow model to the crypto world.

The scope of the issue became clear when Robinhood reported that payment for order flow from crypto trading made up more than half of its second quarter transaction revenue, representing 51.7% or $233 million. That's way up from 20.8% of transaction revenue in the first quarter of 2021 and just $5 million a year ago. The runaway growth in crypto might have been less obvious had it not been for a slowing of the meme-stock craze right as interest in crypto took off.

This also has meant a shuffling in Robinhood's partners. Jump Trading's Tai Mo Shan Ltd. paid Robinhood $164 million for crypto orders in the second quarter. Robinhood's relationship with Citadel, a primary partner for stock and option payment for order flow, has gotten considerable scrutiny. But the broker's relationship with Jump Trading has drawn less attention, even as its payments exceeded what Robinhood has ever gotten from Citadel in a given quarter according to researchers at Alphacution Research Conservatory.

It's not clear that crypto payment for order flow is even on the SEC's radar, or if it could even regulate the practice, since crypto markets are not currently regulated as exchanges. Gensler has articulated a desire for Congress to give the SEC broader authority over crypto, but it's not clear when a broader regulatory remit might come.

Regulators could come after crypto brokers, but "right now all they can do is saber rattling," said Paul Rowady, founder of Alphacution. At most, the agency might go after "domestic brokers that are engaged in retail activity in the crypto market," he added.

Even then, much of the parceling out of trades is happening internationally, he said: "It's the Wild West. It's a global market with cross-border activity. Even U.S. entities potentially are engaging with crypto infrastructure that's non-U.S. That puts U.S. regulators at a disadvantage because they don't have jurisdiction."

Dealing with that "will require a coordinated effort with a global consortium of regulators, which will take a lot of time," he added.

In this fast-growing crypto market, there is little guarantee that retail investors are getting the best prices on trades. Crypto spreads can be much bigger than equities, providing more opportunity for market makers and others to profit off of retail investors.

In equities and options, brokers and market makers must disclose in public reports to the SEC who they send trades to and how much they make. Through such reports, we know Robinhood made four times as much in payments for each S&P 500 share traded as Schwab did in December 2020. Such disclosures don't exist for crypto, so it's all but impossible to know who's profiting and how much they're making.

Robinhood, for its part, has said payment for order flow in crypto enables commission-free crypto trading, which gives investors the cheapest total cost. The company declined to comment on the record for this story.

Robinhood says it doesn't route crypto orders based on payments market makers provide. "We receive uniform volume-based rebates from trading venues, but never consider rebates when deciding where to route your order," Robinhood wrote in a June blog post.

Robinhood says that its buy orders are executed as a limit order with a 1% collar to ensure prices don't differ wildly from what traders expect.

Coinbase, for its part, charges retail investors a fee of up to 1.49% plus a set fee that varies based on the size of the order. It sends retail trades to execute on its Coinbase Pro exchange, so there is no payment for order flow.

There remains the question of whether retail investors are getting the prices on crypto trades. In the equities and options world, there is the National Best Bid and Offer, an official record of the best price available on exchanges at a particular moment. The NBBO is flawed and imperfect, since it doesn't actually reflect the best price to be found anywhere — market makers operate their own liquidity pools that can yield better pricing unavailable on exchanges — but it is a formal benchmark that brokers and exchanges can be measured against. Brokers and market makers are obligated to execute most trades close to the NBBO, but often, substantial profits can be made within the NBBO spread.

In the crypto world, because crypto exchanges are not regulated as exchanges, there is no NBBO and there is no official record of the best price.

So how do investors know what they're getting? The largest brokers tend to set the prices, some experts said. Genesis Trading, for example, is one large prime broker that can set the market price, according to one crypto expert.

But spreads in crypto markets vary widely, particularly between different exchanges. There are entire trading firms that focus on arbitrage between exchanges.

As a result, large investors that are trading large blocks of crypto go to a firm like Genesis to execute trades. Those firms then break down those trades and execute them in myriad ways, depending on how big they are and how fast they need to be executed. These include trading with other brokers, sending it to exchanges such as Coinbase's or taking on the trades internally.

Small retail investors don't have a prime broker who can get them the best trades.

This frontier wildness won't last forever. Crypto companies in the U.S., as they mature, will seek to make nice with regulators, Rowady said. "There is a self-regulating nature to all this," he said. "There's legal exposure if a fiduciary doesn't make all the effort to find the best prices and best execution."

That self-interest will force institutions to make some changes, he said.

But for now, it's crypto buyer beware.

Protocol | Enterprise

Why Segment is central to Twilio’s path to enterprise software stardom

Given Apple's recent changes to third-party tracking technology and Google's looming changes, the customer data platform provider is poised to play a central role in Twilio's product vision moving forward.

The launch of Engage points to the critical role Segment will play in Twilio's future.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

This week at Twilio's annual conference, it's Segment, the company it acquired last year for $3.2 billion, that's poised to take center stage.

Signal kicks off on Wednesday. Alongside Michelle Obama, one of the highlights of the two-day event is bound to be Twilio Engage, a new product that showcases the combined capabilities of the cloud communications provider and Segment, the customer data platform vendor that Twilio bought last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | Workplace

The whiteboard wars: Miro and Figma want to make meetings better

Miro and Figma separately launched features on Tuesday aimed at improving collaboration on their platforms.

Whiteboard rivals Miro and Figma each released collaboration improvements.

Logos: Figma and Miro

We expect a lot from our productivity tools these days. You can't just stroll over to your team members' desks and show them what you're working on anymore. Most of those interactions need to happen online, and it's even better if the work and the communication can happen in one place. Miro and Figma — competitors in the collaborative whiteboard space — understand how critical remote collaboration is, and are both working to up their meeting game.

This week, both platforms announced features aimed at improving the collaboration experience, each vying to be the home base for teams to work and hang out together. Figma announced updates to its multiplayer whiteboard FigJam, and Miro announced a new set of tools that it's calling Miro Smart Meetings. Figma's goal is to make FigJam more customizable and accessible for everyone; Miro wants to be the best place for content-centered, professional meetings. They both want to be the go-to hub for teams looking to get stuff done.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Protocol | Workplace

Hybrid work is here to stay. Here’s how to do it better.

We've recovered from the COVID-19 digital collaboration whiplash. Now we must build a more intentional model for hybrid work.

This is a call to managers to understand the mundane or unwanted projects their employees face, and what work excites them.

Photo: Adobe

Ashley Still is Adobe's Senior Vice President of Digital Media – Marketing, Strategy & Global Partnerships.

When COVID-19 hit, we were forced into a fully digital mode of business operation. Overnight, we adopted available remote work tools — even if imperfect, they were the best tools for the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Ashley Still
As Senior Vice President, Digital Media – Marketing, Strategy & Global Partnerships, Ashley Still leads product marketing and business development for Adobe's flagship Creative Cloud and Document Cloud offerings. This includes iconic software brands such as Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator, InDesign and Acrobat. Her expanded remit now includes Adobe's strategic partnership work with technology companies globally, including Apple, Microsoft and Google; and driving Adobe's fast-growing mobile app business. Her team is also responsible for the demand generation marketing campaigns that makes Adobe the market-leader, across creative and document productivity segments. Previously she was Vice President and General Manager, Adobe Creative Cloud for Enterprise. Here her team delivered an integrated content creation, collaboration and publishing solution that securely enables brands to create exceptional design and content. Prior to this, Ashley was Senior Director of Product & Marketing for Adobe Primetime, an Internet television platform used by Comcast, Turner, NBC Sports and other global media companies to deliver TV content and dynamic advertising to any Internet device. Under Ashley's leadership, Adobe Primetime won an Emmy Award for the Adobe Pass TV-Everywhere service. Ashley joined Adobe in 2004 following her internship with the company and held several product management positions for Adobe Photoshop. Still earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University and her Masters degree from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Protocol | Workplace

Meet the productivity app influencers

Within the realm of productivity influencing, there is a somewhat surprising sect: Creators who center their content around a specific productivity app.

People are making content and building courses based off of their favorite productivity apps.

Photos: Courtesy

This is the creators' internet. The rest of us are just living in it. We're accustomed to the scores of comedy TikTokers, beauty YouTubers and lifestyle Instagram influencers gracing our feeds. A significant portion of these creators are productivity gurus, advising their followers on how they organize their lives.

Within the realm of productivity influencing, there's a surprising sect: Creators who center their content around a specific productivity app. They're a powerful part of these apps' ecosystems, drawing users to the platform and offering helpful tips and tricks. Notion in particular has a huge influencer family, with #notion gaining millions of views on TikTok.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Latest Stories