Regulators are going after payments for stock orders. What about crypto?

The SEC is concerned about payment for order flow in stocks and options. But crypto, which it is struggling to regulate, is a "Wild West."

Bitcoin illustration

What are you paying for your bitcoin?

Illustration: Jeremy Bezanger / Unsplash

Two of the SEC's major concerns are payment for order flow, the potentially conflict-ridden system where retail brokers get paid by market makers for sending them orders, and cryptocurrencies, the largely unregulated digital tokens that are generating a booming market in speculative trading.

What if you put them together?

That's not a hypothetical question: Robinhood, the online broker that recently went public, is already making more money from crypto payment for order flow than any other source.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has said the agency is scrutinizing payment for order flow, a decades-old business model that is used by large brokers like Schwab and TD Ameritrade but that Robinhood has finessed into profitable perfection. Regulators are considering all options including a ban on such arrangements, with Gensler noting that conflicts are "inherent" in a system where market makers pay retail brokers for directing trades to them, in effect splitting profits that come at investors' expense.

Cryptocurrencies were designed for peer-to-peer transactions, bypassing middlemen and marketplaces. But marketplaces have arisen nonetheless, facilitating buying and selling much like stock and currency markets do. And Robinhood, in particular, is championing the idea of extending the payment for order flow model to the crypto world.

The scope of the issue became clear when Robinhood reported that payment for order flow from crypto trading made up more than half of its second quarter transaction revenue, representing 51.7% or $233 million. That's way up from 20.8% of transaction revenue in the first quarter of 2021 and just $5 million a year ago. The runaway growth in crypto might have been less obvious had it not been for a slowing of the meme-stock craze right as interest in crypto took off.

This also has meant a shuffling in Robinhood's partners. Jump Trading's Tai Mo Shan Ltd. paid Robinhood $164 million for crypto orders in the second quarter. Robinhood's relationship with Citadel, a primary partner for stock and option payment for order flow, has gotten considerable scrutiny. But the broker's relationship with Jump Trading has drawn less attention, even as its payments exceeded what Robinhood has ever gotten from Citadel in a given quarter according to researchers at Alphacution Research Conservatory.

It's not clear that crypto payment for order flow is even on the SEC's radar, or if it could even regulate the practice, since crypto markets are not currently regulated as exchanges. Gensler has articulated a desire for Congress to give the SEC broader authority over crypto, but it's not clear when a broader regulatory remit might come.

Regulators could come after crypto brokers, but "right now all they can do is saber rattling," said Paul Rowady, founder of Alphacution. At most, the agency might go after "domestic brokers that are engaged in retail activity in the crypto market," he added.

Even then, much of the parceling out of trades is happening internationally, he said: "It's the Wild West. It's a global market with cross-border activity. Even U.S. entities potentially are engaging with crypto infrastructure that's non-U.S. That puts U.S. regulators at a disadvantage because they don't have jurisdiction."

Dealing with that "will require a coordinated effort with a global consortium of regulators, which will take a lot of time," he added.

In this fast-growing crypto market, there is little guarantee that retail investors are getting the best prices on trades. Crypto spreads can be much bigger than equities, providing more opportunity for market makers and others to profit off of retail investors.

In equities and options, brokers and market makers must disclose in public reports to the SEC who they send trades to and how much they make. Through such reports, we know Robinhood made four times as much in payments for each S&P 500 share traded as Schwab did in December 2020. Such disclosures don't exist for crypto, so it's all but impossible to know who's profiting and how much they're making.

Robinhood, for its part, has said payment for order flow in crypto enables commission-free crypto trading, which gives investors the cheapest total cost. The company declined to comment on the record for this story.

Robinhood says it doesn't route crypto orders based on payments market makers provide. "We receive uniform volume-based rebates from trading venues, but never consider rebates when deciding where to route your order," Robinhood wrote in a June blog post.

Robinhood says that its buy orders are executed as a limit order with a 1% collar to ensure prices don't differ wildly from what traders expect.

Coinbase, for its part, charges retail investors a fee of up to 1.49% plus a set fee that varies based on the size of the order. It sends retail trades to execute on its Coinbase Pro exchange, so there is no payment for order flow.

There remains the question of whether retail investors are getting the prices on crypto trades. In the equities and options world, there is the National Best Bid and Offer, an official record of the best price available on exchanges at a particular moment. The NBBO is flawed and imperfect, since it doesn't actually reflect the best price to be found anywhere — market makers operate their own liquidity pools that can yield better pricing unavailable on exchanges — but it is a formal benchmark that brokers and exchanges can be measured against. Brokers and market makers are obligated to execute most trades close to the NBBO, but often, substantial profits can be made within the NBBO spread.

In the crypto world, because crypto exchanges are not regulated as exchanges, there is no NBBO and there is no official record of the best price.

So how do investors know what they're getting? The largest brokers tend to set the prices, some experts said. Genesis Trading, for example, is one large prime broker that can set the market price, according to one crypto expert.

But spreads in crypto markets vary widely, particularly between different exchanges. There are entire trading firms that focus on arbitrage between exchanges.

As a result, large investors that are trading large blocks of crypto go to a firm like Genesis to execute trades. Those firms then break down those trades and execute them in myriad ways, depending on how big they are and how fast they need to be executed. These include trading with other brokers, sending it to exchanges such as Coinbase's or taking on the trades internally.

Small retail investors don't have a prime broker who can get them the best trades.

This frontier wildness won't last forever. Crypto companies in the U.S., as they mature, will seek to make nice with regulators, Rowady said. "There is a self-regulating nature to all this," he said. "There's legal exposure if a fiduciary doesn't make all the effort to find the best prices and best execution."

That self-interest will force institutions to make some changes, he said.

But for now, it's crypto buyer beware.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories