Policy

Robo-DMs are coming for you. Here’s what you need to know.

Debt collectors can now slide into your Twitter DMs.

Slack message with team communicating and collaborating in app on desktop and mobile.

Some advocates believe the new communication options could lead to an uptick in debt collection scams.

Photo: Austin Distel/Unsplash

Have you received an Instagram DM from a debt collector yet?

Last week, new rules implemented by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau went into effect that allow debt collectors to reach out to consumers via electronic communication, including social media direct messages. The CFPB said it believes the rules will modernize the debt collection process, as they amend an act that was originally passed in 1977. But advocates believe these amendments can open the floodgates for scammers, or cause a less tech-savvy consumer to miss information about debts owed.

Here’s the low-down on what these rules mean for consumers — and the potential downsides.

What do these rules allow?

Yes, debt collectors can now slide into your DMs on any platform. They can also reach you via “any medium” including oral, written and electronic, including text or email. The rules allow debt collectors to friend request users on social media, but specify that they must identify themselves as debt collectors when reaching out. They also must give users the option to opt out of texts, emails or DMs, and can’t post on users’ personal pages in attempts to get in contact with them. Any kind of publicly viewable message is not allowed.

This rule covers various debts for personal or household purposes, including mortgages, credit cards and medical bills.

How did these rules happen in the first place?

The rule changes were first introduced in 2020 by Kathleen Kraninger, the former director of the CFPB under the Trump administration. The rules are an update to the 1977 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which prohibits harassment, abuse and misleading and unfair debt collection practices through phone calls. The updates went into effect on Nov. 30.

“Advances in technology in particular have transformed how we communicate, with cell phones enabling us to take a call or receive a text 24 hours a day in our neighborhood or on the other side of the globe,” Kraninger said in an October 2020 blog post about the rules. “But debt collectors and consumers have been trapped in a time warp. They have been required to communicate with each other under standards Congress enacted in 1977.”

But the process of defining what counts as electronic communications in the rule was hotly debated. During the new rule’s comment period, industry advocates argued that direct messaging communications on social media should be treated the same as email, because both are “password protected and generally not reassigned.” Meanwhile, critics argued that because some platforms require users to search for each other by first and last name rather than by distinct usernames, this increases the likelihood of debt collectors reaching out to the wrong people.

The bureau ended up declining to include direct messaging under the definition of email, separating social media into its own category in the final rule with some additional restrictions.

Another argument was over the times during the day that debt collectors can reach out to consumers. Some commenters suggested that calls be allowed within the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time, but requested that emails and texts be exempt from this rule. One stated that putting time restrictions on emails and texts puts debt collectors at a “competitive disadvantage because no other industry has such a restriction.” But the CFPB negated those comments, applying the time restrictions to debt collectors’ electronic communications as well as phone calls.

During Kraninger’s two years in office, the CFPB, once known for its consumer watchdog practices, saw an easing of enforcement and regulations. Kraninger resigned in January at the request of President Biden and was replaced by Rohit Chopra, who was the assistant director of the agency until 2017 when he joined the FTC.

What could go wrong?

Some advocates believe the new communication options could lead to an uptick in debt collection scams. The updates provide another, potentially even simpler avenue for scammers, which were already a common occurrence (i.e. endless robocalls), to spam users and swindle money out of those who may not know the difference between a real debt collector and a fake one.

“There are a lot of scams out there in this field,” said Christine Hines, legislative director at the National Association of Consumer Advocates. “And adding electronic communications to that minefield would open up another way for scammers to take advantage of people.”

Aside from scams, consumer advocates say they’re concerned that while the update limited the calls that a debt collector can make to seven per week per debt, it doesn’t put any limitations on the number of electronic communications one can send out.

The rules also put the onus on the consumer to check their social media, which means someone who’s more unplugged from social media may miss information about a debt they owe.

What happens next?

While the rules provide no specific limitations on the number of DMs that can be sent to a consumer, a CFPB spokesperson said in an email the agency makes it clear to debt collectors that they are “breaking the law if they harass consumers” via electronic communication. The agency said it will be “looking very carefully” at how debt collectors use these rules.

“We’re not going to tolerate excessive emails, texts or DMs, and we expect debt collectors to verify consumers’ identities as well as the underlying debts,” the spokesperson said. “Far too many Americans are hounded to pay money they do not owe.”

The rules apply specifically to debt collectors, but they could open the door to other kinds of spam DMs, especially amid reports of rising robocalls over the past year — 4.1 billion occurred in November, according to research by robocall blocking app YouMail, more than four times higher than in the same month six years ago. Maybe you’ll start to get messages on Twitter soon about your car's extended warranty… even if you don’t own a car.

Though Hines said she hasn’t heard of any reports of DM, text or email scams to the association yet, the rule has only been in effect for a week. If one does occur that is reported to the organization, it offers representation from its network of 1,500 consumer attorneys for people who are facing debt collection abuses.

“This is an issue that deserves monitoring,” Hines said. “Because we're kind of just speculating on what could happen based on past experience.”

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Policy

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Fintech

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins