yesIssie LapowskyNone
×

Get access to Protocol

I’ve already subscribed

Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Politics

Democrats and Twitter want to autoreply you into voting

With a new campaign, the Democrats will automatically send people tweets reminding them when and how to vote in their state.

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris at the DNC

The DNC is asking Twitter users to opt-in for automatic updates on voting this year.

Photo: Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

With a little over a month to go before Election Day, the Democratic National Committee is launching a Twitter campaign that will automatically send people tweets reminding them about when and how to vote in their state.

On Thursday evening, the Democratic party in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., will send out tweets asking people to opt in for updates. Anyone who likes or retweets that message will get autoreplies in their Twitter mentions, including real-time information on registration, mail-in ballot deadlines, early voting and polling hours, among other things. The outreach is an attempt by the Democrats to cut through the morass of confusion and misinformation about voting this year being fomented online — including from the president himself.

"We're in a historically digital-first election. We're always looking for ways we can lower the barrier to entry and make sure that voting is easier and people are getting more accessible and authoritative information," said the DNC's deputy chief mobilization officer, Heather Reid. "We just view this as one of the arrows in our quiver that we're using to do that, in addition to all the other ways that we can contact voters."

Voters who opt in to such alerts from their state Democratic party are likely to be pretty engaged in the process already. But Reid said the Democrats are working with each party to find influencers and community leaders who can retweet the message, too. That way, Reid said, "It's not just people who typically already interact with or follow their state party, but maybe people who follow their pastor on Twitter, too."

For campaigns, the ability to contact voters through social media has become increasingly alluring and necessary. While both parties' voter files are busting with addresses, phone numbers and email addresses, matching those voters to their social media accounts is a trickier task. Reid declined to discuss whether data from subscribers would be collected for future use, but a DNC spokesperson said this campaign "isn't focused on collecting data."

This isn't the Democrats' first stab at this type of outreach. The convention committee launched a similar campaign during the Democratic National Convention, amassing 60,000 subscribers. Reid said that campaign was such a success that "for a while, Twitter had to catch up to how many people wanted to interact with us."

A Twitter spokesperson said that the autoreply tool, which is most often used by movie studios and the entertainment industry, was offered to both the Democrats and Republicans before their conventions. Only the Democrats took Twitter up on the offer. The spokesperson confirmed that so many people subscribed to the Democrats' updates that the number exceeded the Twitter API's limits for how many tweets can be sent at once.

Twitter has launched its own election-related push, too. On National Voter Registration Day, it prompted every user in the U.S. to register or check their registration status at the top of their timeline. The company also has an Election Hub, which appears at the top of the Explore tab for every U.S. Twitter user. As part of the Election Hub, Twitter offers an autoreply option users can subscribe to, as well. But Reid says that while Twitter has stepped up its efforts to actively share authoritative information on voting, that outreach isn't tailored by state, which she says is crucial. "We think about a national campaign as really just a patchwork of state by state campaigns," Reid said, noting that the Twitter replies will be powered by IWillVote.com, the Democrats' central voter information website. That site is staffed by a full-time team that updates information from the states as soon as it's available.

In their efforts to spread authoritative information about voting, the Democrats are swimming upstream amid a deluge of misinformation, particularly about mail-in voting, coming from the highest level of government. During Tuesday night's debate, in front of an audience of some 73 million viewers, President Trump called mail-in ballots a "disaster" and falsely claimed that they're being "dumped in rivers" or thrown out because election officials "don't like them." That's in addition to his frequent social media posts on the subject, which tech platforms including Twitter and Facebook have — sometimes to confusing effect — slapped with information labels. It also stands in stark contrast to the messages his campaign has been sending in thousands of ads urging swing state voters to request ballots to vote by mail.

Combatting those messages is a far tougher problem that no one, including the Democrats, has quite solved. "I have found it's more effective cycle over cycle to really just double down and keep doing the work, pay less attention to the noise and more attention to doing the work that is at hand," Reid said. "We are going to focus on making sure [voters] have that info in every way possible."

Politics

'Woke tech' and 'the new slave power': Conservatives gather for Vegas summit

An agenda for the event, hosted by the Claremont Institute, listed speakers including U.S. CTO Michael Kratsios and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

The so-called "Digital Statecraft Summit" was organized by the Claremont Institute. The speakers include U.S. CTO Michael Kratsios and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, as well as a who's-who of far-right provocateurs.

Photo: David Vives/Unsplash

Conservative investors, political operatives, right-wing writers and Trump administration officials are quietly meeting in Las Vegas this weekend to discuss topics including China, "woke tech" and "the new slave power," according to four people who were invited to attend or speak at the event as well as a copy of the agenda obtained by Protocol.

The so-called "Digital Statecraft Summit" was organized by the Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank that says its mission is to "restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life." A list of speakers for the event includes a combination of past and current government officials as well as a who's who of far-right provocateurs. One speaker, conservative legal scholar John Eastman, rallied the president's supporters at a White House event before the Capitol Hill riot earlier this month. Some others have been associated with racist ideologies.

Keep Reading Show less
Emily Birnbaum

Emily Birnbaum ( @birnbaum_e) is a tech policy reporter with Protocol. Her coverage focuses on the U.S. government's attempts to regulate one of the most powerful industries in the world, with a focus on antitrust, privacy and politics. Previously, she worked as a tech policy reporter with The Hill after spending several months as a breaking news reporter. She is a Bethesda, Maryland native and proud Kenyon College alumna.

Doxxing insurrectionists: Capitol riot divides online extremism researchers

The uprising has sparked a tense debate about the right way to stitch together the digital scraps of someone's life to publicly accuse them of committing a crime.

Rioters scale the U.S. Capitol walls during the insurrection.

Photo: Blink O'faneye/Flickr

Joan Donovan has a panic button in her office, just in case one of the online extremists she spends her days fighting tries to fight back.

"This is not baby shit," Donovan, who is research director of Harvard's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, said. "You do not fuck around with these people in public."

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.

Why Biden needs a National Technology Council

The U.S. government needs a more tightly coordinated approach to technology, argues Jonathan Spalter.

A coordinated effort to approach tech could help the White House navigate the future more easily.

Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

The White House has a National Security Council and a National Economic Council. President-elect Joe Biden should move quickly to establish a National Technology Council.

Consumers are looking to the government to set a coherent and consistent 21st century digital policy that works for them. Millions of Americans still await public investments that will help connect their remote communities to broadband, while millions more — including many families with school-age children — still struggle to afford access.

Keep Reading Show less
Jonathan Spalter
Jonathan Spalter is the president and CEO of USTelecom – The Broadband Association.
Election 2020

Google says it’s fighting election lies, but its ads fund them

A new report finds that more than 1,600 brands, from Disney to Procter & Gamble, have advertisements running on sites that push pro-Trump conspiracy theories. The majority of those ads are served by Google.

Google is the most dominant player in programmatic advertising, but it has a spotty record enforcing rules for publishers.

Photo: Alex Tai/Getty Images

Shortly after November's presidential election, a story appeared on the website of far-right personality Charlie Kirk, claiming that 10,000 dead people had returned mail-in ballots in Michigan. But after publishing, a correction appeared at the top of the story, completely debunking the misleading headline, which remains, months later, unchanged.

"We are not aware of a single confirmed case showing that a ballot was actually cast on behalf of a deceased individual," the correction, which quoted Michigan election officials, read.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.

Big Tech is cutting off political contributions. Here are the biggest losers.

Election objectors like McCarthy, Nunes, Jordan and Stefanik all took tech PAC money last year. But they're not the only ones losing out.

Some of tech's biggest critics in Congress have taken money from tech PACs. Now, they're getting cut off.

Photo: Darren Halstead/Unsplash

One day after Twitter banned President Trump and Google and Apple kicked the far-right social network Parler out of their app stores, New York Rep. Elise Stefanik dashed off a tweet: "If you think the American people will quietly accept #BigTechTyranny, You. Are. Wrong."

One detail Stefanik left out: She took $30,000 from corporate PACs linked to Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Intel in the last year alone, according to campaign finance records. During her tenure in Congress, she's raised nearly twice that much from those companies. And now, she's getting cut off.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.
Latest Stories