COVID-19 kickstarted a war over web accessibility

The pandemic spurred demand for a more accessible web, but experts and practitioners disagree on the best approach to get there.

Keyboard with accessibility keys

Experts and practitioners disagree on the best approach to building an accessible web.

Image: alexsl/Getty Images

The pandemic triggered a surge in demand for technology that helps companies adapt their websites for users with disabilities as businesses scrambled to accommodate customers who were now forced to do almost everything online.

This period gave a boost to companies such as AudioEye, EqualWeb and Deque, which offer accessibility services like alternative text that describes images for visually impaired users. But it also sparked a war over the best way to build a more accessible web, with one side arguing the fastest way to achieve change is to put accessible overlays onto existing sites, and the other arguing the web will never be truly accessible until developers build it that way from the start.

One in four adults in the United States is living with some form of disability, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By law, people with disabilities have a right to access the goods and services of businesses serving the public, even in an online context. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, businesses could be required to provide accommodations such as transcription services, integration with assistive listening devices or real-time captioning when necessary. But although this is required by law, it doesn’t always happen.

“The ADA has been around for 30 years, and yet we still have 2[%] to 3% of the web that is accessible, and the remaining 97% is not,” said Dominic Varacalli, chief operating officer for AudioEye, an accessibility auditing firm.

The pandemic has certainly jumpstarted more activity in this space. According to a new report released Wednesday, 62% of sites in the Alexa Top 100 were accessible in 2021, a noticeable increase from just 29% in 2019. For mobile apps, 65% of free iOS apps and 75% of free Android apps were accessible via screen-reader testing. The report was developed by Diamond, a digital agency that designs accessible experiences for companies like Fox, the NFL, Pluto TV and others. “The trend was to improve accessibility, but the pandemic made that trend accelerate,” said Joe Devon, co-founder of Diamond.

AudioEye, for one, has experienced substantial growth for its core business during the pandemic. The company uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to automatically identify, flag and fix accessibility errors. The company’s scanning technology can view an image, examine the underlying source code, identify that there’s no alternative text and then flag it for review. “And then we have automation that will take that image and send it off to an AI algorithm that will describe it,” Varacalli said.

AudioEye’s services are what some in the industry call "overlays," services that modify the presentation of a page to change things like contrast, text size and other features to improve usability for people with disabilities. These services can alter or fix web pages without actually touching the underlying source code. AudioEye does have human specialists on staff to work on issues the technology alone can't fix.

AudioEye takes that approach in part because the team behind it believes it's crucial to provide web accessibility solutions for as many businesses as possible, just as it’s critical for brick-and-mortar businesses to be physically accessible. Overlay services enable companies to at least offer minimal accessibility to users with disabilities. And many of these solutions can be implemented quickly and at low cost. “The internet doesn't work until all websites are accessible for an individual. If I walk around the block and I can only go into one store, you essentially forced a choice on me,” Varacalli said.

A ‘far left’ approach to design

But overlays have been the source of substantial controversy too. Dylan Barrell, chief technology officer and chief product officer for Deque, argued developers should be embedding accessibility testing and design into their normal development cycles. Deque builds tools that help developers factor in accessibility when a software product is first being designed, rather than after the fact.

According to Barrell, addressing and testing for accessibility early in the development cycle is both more efficient and more economical. “When you start with design, when you start that far left in the process, then you have the best chance of creating something that is easy to make accessible,” he said.

During a normal software development cycle, developers will build software, test to see if it works like it's supposed to and then ship the final product. Rather than test for accessibility once the final product is built, Deque’s API lets developers test for accessibility while they’re still building.

That’s where Deque’s solution diverges from AudioEye’s low-code or no-code approach. Deque wants developers involved in accessibility testing, rather than letting AI fix applications automatically. “There's a lot of things that are actually super difficult to do after the fact, automatically,” said Barrell.

If a drop-down menu wasn’t designed to work via a keyboard, for example, it would be extremely difficult to add that keyboard functionality in an automated way retroactively, he said. “You're never going to be as good as if you were actually having the developers and the designers do that themselves. And you're also very prone to breaking when changes occur,” he said.

Indeed, even with improvements spurred by the pandemic, accessible sites are still often riddled with errors. The Diamond report found that among the Alexa Top 100 websites, 97% of pages improperly used a set of technical specifications for developers known as ARIA.

Deque focuses on development teams and designers as the core audience for its accessibility offerings. The company is known for its open-source accessibility testing rules library Axe-Core, which has been used by tech giants like Google and Microsoft to test for web accessibility.

Of course, this approach is a luxury not every company can afford. Tech giants benefit from being able to hire their own internal accessibility experts, whereas smaller companies often can’t, or at least don’t. Google has a whole suite of accessibility products and services and an accessibility support team, while Microsoft has similar accessibility offerings.

Still, disability experts and advocates tend to agree with Barrell. In March of this year, over 600 leaders in this space, including internal accessibility experts for Google, Microsoft and Apple, wrote an open letter in opposition to overlay solutions.

“We hereby advocate for the removal of web accessibility overlay and encourage the site owners who've implemented these products to use more robust, independent, and permanent strategies to making their sites more accessible,” the letter states.

The letter specifically cites AudioEye and counterpart EqualWeb as examples of the “overlay” solutions they are criticizing. The letter notes that making automated improvements to the front end of web pages isn’t enough to achieve compliance with the ADA because automated fixes can lead to unreliable text alternatives for images or difficulties using assistive technologies like screen readers.

Erez Bahat, co-CEO of EqualWeb, which offers automated overlays as well as manual remediation services, acknowledged that these types of tools are only one part of the equation. “It is important to note that in most cases this tool is not the all-encompassing solution that will provide you with full compliance,” he said. To be fully compliant, Bahat recommends that companies pair automated solutions with manual testing and review by accessibility experts.

Alisa Smith, accessibility evangelist for AudioEye, agreed that not every accessibility issue can be fixed via automation. But there are some key areas of accessibility that can, like creating sufficient color contrast between text and its background so that text is easier to read.

Smith believes that even with the imperfections of automation, it’s a necessary tool. “To scale across a million new web pages a day, there has to be a way to enable those who are not intimate with the code to still have an accessible website,” she said.

Varacalli said this is particularly true of small to medium-sized businesses, which typically don’t have the resources or knowledge to make their sites accessible. “They're running a restaurant or a coffee business and don't know enough about the web to even know accessibility is an issue,” he said. “Maybe they had to comply with the ADA when it comes to a ramp into their store, but never thought about online.”

Ultimately, the best method for designing a more accessible web may be a combination of both approaches. “At the end of the day, we're all looking to make the web more usable for people with disabilities,” said Varacalli. Whether that’s via overlays or the underlying code, the goal is the same. “We just really hope that everyone trying these different approaches will get us to an endpoint where people with disabilities can navigate the internet just like everyone else.”

Update: This story has been updated to clarify that AudioEye and EqualWeb also employ human specialists who work on these issues.


Apple's new payments tech won't kill Square

It could be used in place of the Square dongle, but it's far short of a full-fledged payments service.

The Apple system would reportedly only handle contactless payments.

Photo: Nathan Dumlao/Unsplash

Apple is preparing a product to enable merchants to accept contactless payments via iPhones without additional hardware, according to Bloomberg.

While this may seem like a move to compete with Block and its Square merchant unit in point-of-sale payments, that’s unlikely. The Apple service is using technology from its acquisition of Mobeewave in 2020 that enables contactless payments using NFC technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.


Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories