Did Coinbase screw up? Survey says workers want to talk about race.

Many workers said they would also consider quitting their jobs if their employer doesn't speak out on these issues.

Artsy chat bubble with an ellipsis

A survey found 68% of workers think they should be able to discuss racial justice issues at work.

Photo: Volodymyr Hryschenko/Unsplash

American workers want to be able to discuss social and political issues at the workplace — despite what companies such as Coinbase, Basecamp and New Relic might want you to believe.

It turns out 68% of workers think they should be able to discuss racial justice issues at work, according to a survey conducted by The Harris Poll on behalf of DEI consulting firm Paradigm.

Among Gen Z and "young millennials," 67% felt they should be able to discuss racial justice issues at work. The sentiment was strongest, however, among workers between the ages of 35 and 44 (78%). Sixty-three percent of respondents under 45 said they would consider leaving their company if their employer didn't speak out about these issues.

Recent real-world events reflect that data. Software company Basecamp saw a mass exodus of employees last month after executive leadership at the company pulled a Coinbase and said workplace conversations about social and political issues would no longer be allowed.

"People are wanting to talk about these things more frequently," Paradigm CEO Joelle Emerson told Protocol. "A lot of the reason people join tech companies is because they have a vision of the future that is different from today."

That's why workers at tech companies expect their firms to engage in social and political discussions, and "why the tech industry has seen the most public backlash," she said.

Emerson recommends companies facilitate these conversations in employee resource groups or internal Slack channels committed to social justice. But, she cautions, companies need to equip their workers to have these types of conversations in order to not cause harm to folks from underrepresented groups.

For workers in majority groups, "it can be really easy if you're not used to a particular topic to cause harm or microaggressions or get defensive," Emerson said.

That's why she recommends companies provide ongoing ally skills training to give people a framework for how to engage in discussions pertaining to identity and privilege. This type of training can help people "hold two realities in their head," Emerson said, "that [they're] a good person and the simultaneous reality that [they're] a person who causes harm to people from underrepresented backgrounds in my day-to-day work and life."

'Progress is remarkably slow'

Paradigm, founded in 2014, spent its early days working solely with tech companies such as Pinterest, Slack and Airbnb. The firm has since expanded to also support companies from a variety of industries.

The tech industry has become somewhat less homogenous over time. Many tech companies have made slight gains in representation of women and people of color, but "progress is remarkably slow," Emerson said.

"In tech and every industry we work with, I feel consistently surprised and disappointed with how slow progress is," she said. "Most organizations want to see outcomes change, but when they realize it means they have to change inputs and the way they make decisions, that's when it becomes difficult … it requires meaningful effort and often changes to really ingrained processes and ways of thinking."

That's what prevents true progress, Emerson said. It's not that companies aren't putting the time or the money into DEI efforts — it's that some are resistant to making the types of changes that would have the most real impact such as addressing biases, overhauling recruiting strategies and hiring criteria, and rethinking performance review structures.

The police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd sparked a renewed interest in diversity and inclusion in tech. Many tech companies in 2020 spoke out in support of Black Lives Matter, made racial justice commitments and publicly laid out new DEI goals.

"I don't think that has yet led to a dramatic change in outcome," Emerson said. "But the question is: Is this truly an inflection point that will get people to make different decisions, or just something that will lead to a lot more talk and fizzle away?"

She noted, however, that employee activism and energy around these issues can be very effective.

"[The] companies I see making the most meaningful changes — it's not because the leaders are great but because employees are standing up powerfully with a clear voice and are unequivocal in what they're asking for," she said.


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories