Uber Eats vs. DoorDash: The delivery wars are heating up

Protocol looked at the companies’ revenue, profit and other factors to determine their success.

Two knights — Uber Eats and DoorDash — jousting

Uber Eats and DoorDash have remained dominant food delivery businesses over the past year.

Illustration: KeithBishop/Getty Images; Protocol

There are countless players in the food delivery business, from Grubhub and Postmates to sole restaurants like Domino’s Pizza. But only two have remained top contenders on the App Store and elsewhere over the past year: Uber Eats and DoorDash. Now, it’s time to settle which is the best.

Both companies recently reported strong fourth-quarter earnings, with Uber’s delivery business — which mostly includes Uber Eats — turning a profit for the first time, and DoorDash hitting all-time high order numbers. But the food delivery business has long been viewed as a winner-takes-all market, where one player needs to offer “the highest quality, the greatest selection, and the most affordable price,” as former Facebook and Google leader Valerio Magliulo wrote back in 2016. To the victor goes the market, everyone seems to think.

The battle to be the best food delivery service is still very much on, as both DoorDash and Uber Eats look to prove they can remain strong as COVID-19 precautions wane. But Protocol broke down revenue, profit, number of supported restaurants and other factors from DoorDash and Uber Eats over the past year to determine which business reigns supreme.

Grubhub, which Just Eat Takeaway acquired last summer, is the third major player in this space. We didn't include it in our analysis because Just Eat did not disclose revenue and profit for the company in the last two quarters. Just Eat did not return Protocol’s request for comment.


The number of DoorDash orders have climbed over the course of 2021. The company started with 329 million orders in Q1, increased to 345 million orders in Q2 and bumped up to 347 million orders in Q3. By the fourth quarter, the company reported a total of 369 million orders, prompting its shares to soar.

Still, Uber Eats appears to get far more orders. The company didn’t disclose the number of orders for its delivery business and didn’t respond to Protocol’s request for comment about the information. Still, you can get a decent approximation of its order volume by dividing the company’s gross bookings over the past four quarters by its average order price. Based on that math, the number of orders bumped from roughly 481 million in Q1 to 515 million in Q4.


Revenue for both delivery businesses has grown over the past year. Uber Eats brought in $2.4 billion in the fourth quarter after steadily climbing from $1.74 billion in the first quarter. DoorDash’s revenue increased as well, but it took in less money than Uber Eats: The company brought in $1.3 billion last quarter, up from $1.1 billion from the first quarter.


Uber’s delivery unit posted its first-ever adjusted EBITDA profit of $25 million. The business had been moving in that direction over the course of 2021, when it began with a loss of $200 million.

DoorDash turned a profit all four quarters last year, but its most recent income number is a drop from the previous two quarters. The company made its highest-ever adjusted EBITDA profit of $113 million in Q2, then fell to $47 million in Q4. DoorDash CEO Tony Xu said he expects the company to continue to thrive in the next year, even as pandemic-related precautions taper off.

"I think we've put to rest … this question of what happens to demand as diners go back and you didn't cite restaurants," Xu said during an earnings call Wednesday. “Clearly takeout and delivery … They are complementary. It's very possible to eat inside of a restaurant and get delivery."

Rankings and other factors

DoorDash has consistently remained No. 1 on the App Store among food delivery apps, while Uber Eats has jumped between fourth and second place over the past few months, according to Sensor Tower.

One thing Uber has going for it: Eats supports far more restaurants than DoorDash. The business supports at least 750,000 restaurants, based on the company’s Q2 results, while DoorDash supported over 390,000 restaurants as of late 2020.

The consensus

On its face, Uber Eats is an undeniably larger business in terms of the sheer number of merchants it supports and the amount of cash it takes in. But DoorDash has remained the most well-liked food delivery business on the App Store, and has incrementally brought up its revenue and customer base over the past four quarters.

Both have proven they can remain dominant businesses even as pandemic-related measures ebb and flow. The coming year will prove whether food delivery can remain just as strong, and whether one or the other can start to take over.


Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


What the economic downturn means for pay packages

The war for talent rages on, but dynamics are shifting back to the employers.

Compensation packages could start to look different as companies reshuffle the balance of cash and equity.

Illustration: Nuthawut Somsuk/Getty Images

The market is turning. Tech stocks are slumping — which is bad news for employees — and even industry powerhouses are slowing hiring and laying people off. Tech talent is still in high demand, but compensation packages could start to look different as companies recruit.

“It’s a little bit like whiplash,” compensation consultant Ashish Raina said of the downturn. Raina, who mainly works with startups that have 200 to 800 employees, previously worked as the director of Talent at Index Ventures and head of Compensation and Talent Analytics at Box. “I do think there’s going to be an interesting reckoning in terms of pay increases going forward, how that pay is delivered.”

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories