Protocol | Policy

DoorDash workers got phished. They say DoorDash refused to help.

The phishing scam resulted in one worker losing nearly $900. DoorDash reimbursed these workers only after Protocol reached out.


DoorDash workers say the company was initially unhelpful in resolving their issues.

Photographer: Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sherrie Vidaurri first started delivering for DoorDash in March, and she loved it. The work paid at least $100 per day. In her first week on the job, Vidaurri made a little under $1,000.

"I loved it because I could work when I wanted and didn't have to work when I didn't want to," she told Protocol. "I was really happy. I mean, I couldn't believe I got paid to do what I was doing."

Vidaurri's feelings started to change the week of May 9, when she fell victim to a phishing scam that resulted in the loss of nearly $900. What made matters worse was her experience trying to resolve the issue with DoorDash: Vidaurri and another Dasher did not receive compensation for their stolen wages until they and the Gig Workers Collective reached out to Protocol.

"I am so shocked and thankful," Vidaurri told Protocol when she received an email about her recovered wages in her inbox. She added, "They had to be shamed into doing the right thing."

A phishy link

Phishing scams affected 241,342 people last year, making it the top cybercrime in 2020, according to the FBI's internet crime report. The scams resulted in a collective loss of about $54 million. Meanwhile, 61% of Americans could not identify a fraudulent website, according to a 2019 survey.

The scam works like this: DoorDash workers receive an order that they begin to fulfill. The Dasher then receives a phone call from someone pretending to be a DoorDash support representative, saying the order has been canceled. But because DoorDash hasn't actually canceled the order, the Dasher is unable to get it off their screen. That's when the scammer offers to send the Dasher a link. Upon clicking the link, the Dasher gets logged out of their account and then has to enter their username and password.

The scammer who called Vidaurri also told her about a bogus delivery "challenge" that would give her a $200 bonus. She completed the required number of deliveries the scammer told her to, but never received her bonus. That's when she called DoorDash's support team, only to find the support agent had no idea what she was talking about.

That night, the scammer called Vidaurri again to let her know she had successfully completed the challenge. All she had to do was "confirm" some information and then they would send her a Visa gift card in the mail.

"That kind of raised my suspicion a little bit, but not to the level of there's a problem," Vidaurri said. "And that code he sent me and what I read back to him gave him the last piece of what he needed to change my banking information inside my DoorDash app."

Vidaurri realized something was wrong a couple of days later when she went back to work. She couldn't seem to contact her customer, so she called the support team again, thinking there might be something wrong with the technology DoorDash uses to connect customers with delivery drivers. The support representative asked Vidaurri to confirm some information, but none of it matched what was on her file — because the scammers had gone into her account and changed all her information.

Unfortunately, the support agent was unable to help. "She couldn't do anything for me other than escalate the situation and put it up the chain," Vidaurri said.

Vidaurri started asking questions about how the scam would affect her and her standing in the DoorDash community. But the representative grew irritated with her, she said: "I really tried not to be rude, but I'm sure I came off poorly, because she hung up on me."

Vidaurri called back. This time, she spoke with a different representative who confirmed for her that the scammer successfully withdrew money from her DoorDash account and deposited it into their bank account. The representative explained that it was too late for DoorDash to cancel the payment and retrieve it, but that the company would get back to her within 48 hours. DoorDash never got back to her, she said.

DoorDash did email Vidaurri about suspicious attempts to log in to her account, in the days leading up to when the scammer changed her bank account information. Unfortunately, Vidaurri didn't see those emails immediately and by the time she did, DoorDash had already inadvertently paid the scammers.

"The last time I spoke to anybody, I was basically told that, on their end, the situation is solved," she said. "And that on their end, they're done."

'There is nothing more we can do to salvage these stolen funds'

Dasher Shelly Roofe caught the scammers midway through the process when they tried a similar tactic on her. She successfully reset her DoorDash password and corrected her banking information before the platform distributed the payment, but DoorDash never paid her the $246 she legitimately earned that week, she told Protocol. Similar to Vidaurri, Roofe only received money — $185.14 of it — after we reached out.

DoorDash told Roofe they first needed to conduct an investigation, which could take up to 11 days. Eleven days and then some went by without her money.

In an email to Roofe on May 31, DoorDash acknowledged how frustrating it must be for her, saying the company "understand[s] how hard [she] worked on the DoorDash platform for these earnings."

The support representative went on to blame her, Roofe said.

"Unfortunately, by sharing your password and/or your security code, you gave someone else access to your account and to your money — it's just like giving out the PIN to your ATM card or debit card," the representative wrote in the email seen by Protocol. "For your security and protection, we do not keep your bank account information in our own records. That information lives in your Dasher app and is accessed by our third party payments vendor in order to pay you. When we received your inquiry, we contacted our payments vendor and had them attempt to reverse the transfer of funds. Unfortunately, they were unable to recover your payment. At this point, there is nothing more we can do to salvage these stolen funds."

Roofe felt frustrated by that response because she had already updated her account before payday, she said. Roofe maintains that the scammers didn't take her money — DoorDash withheld it.

"DoorDash takes the trust of our community very seriously, and we're committed to the security of those we serve," a DoorDash spokesperson told Protocol. "We have addressed the fraudulent activity and resolved the issue for both Dashers involved, and appreciate their patience as we ensured proper payment into the correct accounts."

A 'one-time courtesy' reimbursement

DoorDash says it has a policy to reimburse Dashers who have experienced and reported fraud. If workers do experience fraud, DoorDash says they should contact customer support to help resolve the issue. That's why it felt odd to Vidaurri that she received little to no support from DoorDash during this whole process.

DoorDash's email to Vidaurri, viewed by Protocol, specified that "this repayment is a one-time courtesy." It also said DoorDash has the right "not to provide this courtesy if we determine that you have jeopardized the security of your account by sharing your confidential information."

Both Roofe and Vidaurri are relieved to have gotten their money back, but feel frustrated with DoorDash for not doing more to support them and to warn other Dashers of the scam.

It's unclear how many workers the scam has affected. DoorDash said these were one-off incidents and that these types of phishing scams are not a prevalent issue on the DoorDash platform. But on a Reddit thread, a handful of other people reported experiencing similar issues in the past month.

Whether or not it's prevalent, Vidaurri would have liked for DoorDash to have notified her and other Dashers about the scam, just as DoorDash has sent notifications to Dashers warning them not to leave their cars running while they run inside to pick up food due to the potential for vehicle theft. DoorDash could also provide an onboarding process for Dashers in which it explains the ways it will or won't contact Dashers and the type of information they'll never request from Dashers, she added.

"They knew this was happening because they'd been getting a ton of phone calls from people already for two days," Vidaurri said. "When I called support, the gal immediately knew what was going on."

Roofe similarly feels frustrated in DoorDash's handling of the scam, especially given that it happened to Vidaurri two weeks before it happened to her.

"I feel violated because they never informed us there was a problem and they apparently have known about this for a while," Roofe said. "They knew but never said anything about it. They never warned us."

Protocol | China

Beijing meets an unstoppable force: Chinese parents and their children

Live-in tutors disguised as nannies, weekday online tutoring classes and adult gaming accounts for rent. Here's how citizens are finding ways to skirt Beijing's diktats.

Citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies.

Photo: Liu Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images

During the summer break, Beijing handed down a parade of new regulations designed to intervene in youth education and entertainment, including a strike against private tutoring, a campaign to "cleanse" the internet and a strict limit on online game playing time for children. But so far, these seemingly iron-clad rules have met their match, with students and their parents quickly finding workarounds.

Grassroots citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies. Authorities then have to play defense, amending holes in their initial rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Policy

Google and Microsoft are at it again, now over government software

The on-again, off-again battle between the two companies flared up again when Google commissioned a study on how much the U.S. government relies on Microsoft software.

Google and Microsoft are in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Photo: Jens Tandler/EyeEm/Getty Images

According to a new report commissioned by Google, Microsoft has an overwhelming "share in the U.S. government office productivity software market," potentially leading to security risks for local, state and federal governments.

The five-page document, released Tuesday by a trade group that counts Google as a member, represents the latest escalation between the two companies in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Facebook wants to kill the family iPad

Facebook has built the first portable smart display, and is introducing a new household mode that makes it easier to separate work from play.

Facebook's new Portal Go device will go on sale for $199 in October.

Photo: Facebook

Facebook is coming for the coffee table tablet: The company on Tuesday introduced a new portable version of its smart display called Portal Go, which promises to be a better communal device for video calls, media consumption and many of the other things families use iPads for.

Facebook also announced a revamped version of its Portal Pro device Tuesday, and introduced a new household mode to Portals that will make it easier to share these devices with everyone in a home without having to compromise on working-from-home habits. Taken together, these announcements show that there may be an opening for consumer electronics companies to meet this late-pandemic moment with new device categories.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

The techlash is threatening human rights around the world

Some 48 countries introduced laws to regulate tech last year. But researchers say many of those laws are just attempts at censorship and surveillance.

In its latest report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said, "We really see free expression and privacy as under unprecedented strain."

Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Governments around the world are seizing on widespread frustrations with Big Tech as justification for a spate of increasingly restrictive laws governing online speech, a new report finds, a trend that researchers say puts both free expression and the fate of tech companies' overseas employees at risk.

Over the last year alone, some 48 countries worldwide introduced — and in some cases, passed — laws to regulate tech companies, according to the latest report by Freedom House, a nonprofit that publishes an annual survey on internet freedoms in 70 countries. While those laws have often been passed in the name of promoting competition, protecting people's data and moderating offensive content, the report's authors say that, in many cases, these laws are merely thinly veiled attempts to force companies into censorship and surveillance.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories