Amendments to the EARN It Act could resolve its encryption issues

But they probably don't go far enough to appease the tech industry.

​Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham plans to amend the EARN IT Act to address some of the concerns raised by tech advocates.

Photo: Courtesy of Gage Skidmore

The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is planning to amend the controversial EARN IT Act to address some of the concerns raised by tech advocates who said it could enable the government to require "backdoors" into private, encrypted messages for law enforcement.

On Wednesday, the committee published a "manager's amendment" from the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, and Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal. Under the proposed package, which is set to go before the committee during a bill markup on Thursday, the EARN IT Act would no longer make Section 230 immunity conditional on compliance with government-mandated "best practices" for removing child sexual abuse material.

Critics for months have railed against the EARN IT Act, warning that the commission-backed "best practices" created by the bill could have required tech companies to allow the government to access encrypted messages in exchange for legal protections under Section 230. They also claimed the commission's recommendations could violate the Fourth Amendment if they required companies to search for particular kinds of content.

Under the amendment, the bill would still create a government-backed commission to draw up "best practices" around removing child exploitation from the internet, but those recommendations would be voluntary rather than legally required.

The EARN IT Act would still amend Section 230 to allow federal and state claims against internet companies if they host child sexual abuse material, but it would not empower the commission to make potentially unconstitutional demands of the companies.

"Service providers will now be treated like everyone else when it comes to combating child sexual exploitation and eradicating [child sexual abuse material]," a Senate Judiciary Committee aide told Protocol in an email.

If the amended bill is passed, the EARN IT Act, the most serious congressional threat to Section 230 since SESTA/FOSTA, would require online companies to seriously crack down on online child sexual abuse material.

The amendment would also remove a provision that would have left the companies vulnerable to significantly more lawsuits. Previously, the EARN IT Act would have left online platforms liable for a broad set of federal civil penalties if they "recklessly," rather than "knowingly," provided a service that was used to distribute child sexual abuse material. The amendment removes that proposed "reckless" standard.

"The EARN IT Act remains a deeply flawed proposal that would make it harder for IA member companies to rid the internet of [child sexual abuse material] and protect the most vulnerable online," said Mike Lemon, the senior director of federal government affairs with the Internet Association. "The internet industry appreciates that the bill's authors now recognize the serious Fourth Amendment concerns raised by the EARN IT Act, as introduced, and continues to share their goal of ending child exploitation online. However, the proposed manager's amendment to the EARN IT Act replaces one set of problems with another by opening the door to an unpredictable and inconsistent set of standards under state laws that pose many of the same risks to strong encryption."

Reports of child sexual exploitation online have skyrocketed in recent years, as criminals use popular platforms including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to spread images and videos of minors in violation of federal law. But so far, the companies have been largely insulated from legal action over the child sexual abuse material due to Section 230 protections. The EARN IT Act would leave them open to a wave of lawsuits.


The tools that make you pay for not getting stuff done

Some tools let you put your money on the line for productivity. Should you bite?

Commitment contracts are popular in a niche corner of the internet, and the tools have built up loyal followings of people who find the extra motivation effective.

Photoillustration: Anna Shvets/Pexels; Protocol

Danny Reeves, CEO and co-founder of Beeminder, is used to defending his product.

“When people first hear about it, they’re kind of appalled,” Reeves said. “Making money off of people’s failure is how they view it.”

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

Elon Musk has bots on his mind.

Photo: Christian Marquardt/Getty Images

Elon Musk says he needs proof that less than 5% of Twitter's users are bots — or the deal isn't going ahead.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.


Nobody will help Big Tech prevent online terrorism but itself

There’s no will in Congress or the C-suites of social media giants for a new approach, but smaller platforms would have room to step up — if they decided to.

Timothy Kujawski of Buffalo lights candles at a makeshift memorial as people gather at the scene of a mass shooting at Tops Friendly Market at Jefferson Avenue and Riley Street on Sunday, May 15, 2022 in Buffalo, NY. The fatal shooting of 10 people at a grocery store in a historically Black neighborhood of Buffalo by a young white gunman is being investigated as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism, according to federal officials.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

The shooting in Buffalo, New York, that killed 10 people over the weekend has put the spotlight back on social media companies. Some of the attack was livestreamed, beginning on Amazon-owned Twitch, and the alleged shooter appears to have written about how his racist motivations arose from misinformation on smaller or fringe sites including 4chan.

In response, policymakers are directing their anger at tech platforms, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul calling for the companies to be “more vigilant in monitoring” and for “a legal responsibility to ensure that such hate cannot populate these sites.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

We're answering all your questions about the crypto crash.

Photo: Chris Liverani/Unsplash

People started talking about another crypto winter in January, when falling prices had wiped out $1 trillion in value from November’s peak. Prices rallied back in March, restoring some of the losses. Then crypto fell hard again, with bitcoin down more than 60% from its all-time high and other cryptocurrencies harder hit. The market’s message was clear: Crypto winter was no longer coming. It’s here.

If you’ve got questions about the crypto crash, the Protocol Fintech team has answers.

Keep Reading Show less
Latest Stories