Elizabeth Holmes’ case is with the jury

A verdict in the Theranos fraud case could come by the end of the year.

Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes

Elizabeth Holmes is accused of fraud in her role leading Theranos

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

After four months, the trial of Elizabeth Holmes is coming to a close.

The case against Holmes, on charges of fraud stemming from her reign over failed blood-testing startup Theranos, went to the jury Friday. As the trial wound down this week, the defense concluded its closing arguments and the prosecution gave a final rebuttal. Holmes, who is being tried for 11 counts of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, could face a maximum federal prison sentence of 20 years per count.

Kevin Downey, one of Holmes’ lawyers, hammered home the point that the entrepreneur couldn’t have intentionally defrauded investors because she believed in the company every step of the way. He returned to the fact that Holmes never sold a share of her stock in Theranos while contending that there wasn’t evidence that she held onto her stake to maintain control and avoid scrutiny, as the government had argued.

"[At the] first sign of trouble, crooks cash out, criminals cover up and rats flee a sinking ship," Downey said. "She went down with that ship when it went down.”

Downey also sought to shift blame onto former Theranos lab director Adam Rosendorff. Rosendorff’s testimony supported her faith in his expertise, Downey argued, as he said he never signed off on validation reports for tests he wasn’t comfortable with. He also argued that Rosendorff was responsible for the conditions that alarmed former lab associate Erika Cheung, whose whistleblower complaint to the CMS triggered an investigation that led to the shutdown of the company’s testing lab.

He also argued investors could have done their own questioning and research, but failed to do so. Downey claimed it was public knowledge that Theranos performed needle-in-the arm blood draws as part of its testing, refuting testimony by Alan Eisenman, an investor who gave the company around $1.2 million and claimed that fact had been hidden from him.

In its rebuttal, the prosecution said blame couldn’t be placed on investors.

“The level of due diligence doesn’t matter,” said John Bostic, a prosecutor representing the U.S. “A scheme to defraud is still a scheme to defraud, even if it would only ensnare someone who is less careful than they should be.”

No matter how much Holmes believed in Theranos, Bostic argued, the company she portrayed to investors and partners never really existed. And Holmes was "so desperate to see the company succeed," Bostic said, that she would have done anything.

"The disease that plagued Theranos was not a lack of effort,” Bostic said. “It was a lack of honesty.”

Refuting the defense’s overarching narrative that Holmes was a naïve and starry-eyed college drop-out who didn’t understand the consequences of her actions, Bostic said she was “certainly old enough to know the difference between right and wrong.”

The jury began deliberating on Friday, and could return a verdict by the end of the year.

Once again, the many watching the trial — former employees, investors, curious members of the public and even the odd Elizabeth Holmes cosplayer or two — will have to wait.


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories