Enterprise

Upended by the cloud: How 50-year-old data giant Acxiom learned to accept change

For 53-year-old data services giant Acxiom, the question is not just how to move its data and its customers’ data to the cloud. It’s how to do it without jeopardizing its raison d’être.

Upended by the cloud: How 50-year-old data giant Acxiom learned to accept change

The effect of Acxiom's cloud migration was more than cultural. It forced an upheaval of how the company did business.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

There was a barista station with a cappuccino robot, and guests were treated to a Michelin-caliber spread for breakfast and lunch. But despite the luxe accommodations, there was something nagging visitors from Acxiom when Google Cloud execs hosted people from the data services giant at an all-day briefing at Google HQ in 2019.

As much as Acxiom’s cloud converts believed in its promise of speed, efficiency and connectivity, they knew that moving to the cloud could cost far more than the price of data transfer and compute. It could mean cannibalizing the very business the Arkansas company – famous for its 160,000-square-foot, tornado-proof data center – had been in for much of its 53 years.

Acxiom’s data center services once brought in a significant portion of its revenue, but costs grew as the AI rush required more data storage and speedier processing to enable machine learning and other analytics. Salespeople and others were reluctant to welcome Silicon Valley cloud partnerships that could continue to eat away at the good ol’ days of data center revenues and steak dinners in Little Rock with clients.

Plus, Acxiom’s cloud-faithful would have to convince the rest of the company that a more deliberate move to the cloud was the right one.

“There’s still a lot of old-timers who I think definitely feel that way: that they’re slitting their own throat if they go all-in on cloud,” said Mark Donatelli, managing partner at marketing data technology consultancy Cimply. Donatelli worked on Acxiom’s data services product team from 2009 to 2013, and attended that 2019 Google meeting while working for Acxiom’s parent company, ad agency conglomerate Interpublic Group.

Today Acxiom’s corporate blog posts tout a “cloud-first” approach, but neither Google nor its competitors have an exclusive on that business. The company has relationships with AWS, Google Cloud and Snowflake, as well as other cloud services, including Databricks and MongoDB.

“There’s still a lot of old-timers who [think] they’re slitting their own throat if they go all-in on cloud.” —Mark Donatelli, managing partner at Cimply

Though corporate brand-speak may imply it’s simply a matter of flipping a “cloud-first” switch, figuring out the logistics and business rationale for each piecemeal transition to the cloud is something quite different.

For Acxiom, which is essentially a private cloud company, the question is not just how to move its clients’ customer data and its own proprietary data products and services from inside data center servers to big cloud platforms. It’s how to do that without jeopardizing Acxiom’s decades-long raison d’être.

A piecemeal transition

By the time its execs were invited out for Google’s dog and pony show, Acxiom had already spent a few years evaluating and testing how to implement a gradual shift to the cloud. When Bhavna Godhania, senior director of Strategic Partnerships at Acxiom, started with the company in 2017, she said, “There was already a discovery and analysis core team that would secretly meet, and they had everyone from industry analysts to third-party consulting companies, to technology partners who had previously embarked on their cloud journeys earlier.”

Cloud believers inside the company had been thinking for even longer about how they would need to transform existing data workflows and rebuild systems to ensure they worked when customers used data and systems in the cloud. They all knew migration would be painful: rebuilding data pipelines, upending contracts and going through stringent compliance certifications all over again.

It’s no wonder a lot of Acxiom’s clients have yet to move their proprietary data about their customers, such as phone numbers, emails, purchase history, credit card transactions and website clicks, to the cloud. “The vast majority of clients, across the board — they still run on-prem,” said Eugene Becker, general manager of Data and Identity at Acxiom, referring to customers who store their data and applications in an Acxiom data center, their own data center or a hybrid of the two.

Acxiom must move at the pace of its customers, but the company does have more control over decisions to make its own packaged data and services available on cloud platforms, in order for it to connect more readily with the marketing and customer management cloud applications clients use. The consumer data that Acxiom sells to marketers showing the types of cars people drive, their household income levels or whether they travel or buy antiques is available in AWS’s and Snowflake’s cloud data marketplaces.

Clients can already use the cloud to access the brand-specific private identity graphs Acxiom assembles to connect personally identifiable customer data to other information about them. Those systems are separate from the identity services provided by LiveRamp, which was once an Acxiom subsidiary but split from the company in 2018 and now still partners with it.

Other Acxiom services are in the process of being moved to the cloud. Right now, Acxiom’s U.S. Postal Service-certified data hygiene service is getting set up on AWS, for example. Customers use the system to clean inaccurate contact information to help ensure that physical mail, email and targeted personalized ads go to the right place. In the future, that service could be available on other clouds outside AWS.

“There may be a point where we look at economics and maybe have a hybrid cloud architecture where it's more cost-effective to leave it in one cloud and access it from another cloud,” said Kyle Hollaway, senior vice president of Global Identity at Acxiom.

“[If] you're going to build something from scratch, building to the cloud makes a lot of sense.” —Eugene Becker, general manager of Data and Identity at Acxiom

Inside Acxiom, people talk about how they can’t just “lift and shift.” Today, portions of Acxiom’s identity infrastructure run out of its data centers, while some run in AWS, Becker said. “If you're going to move your data to the cloud, you have to rebuild the solutions,” he said, adding that eventually all of Acxiom’s identity infrastructure will be accessible in AWS.

“It requires a bunch of work, and the advantages are kind of strategic, but if you start to look at the business case, it's not overwhelming in terms of cost savings,” he continued, adding, “[If] you're going to build something from scratch, building to the cloud makes a lot of sense.”

But deciding whether to rebuild an existing application requires a different set of criteria. “Now, to further complicate that, suppose you have a bunch of hardware in a data center that's already been paid for. [That] hardware, for some period of time until it breaks down, could be more efficient than the cloud,” Becker said. “You really have to do the math on the migration to figure out how and when you’re going to end up making money, and the calculus really varies.”

Data security and privacy are major deciding factors for Acxiom, too. As a legacy data broker scrutinized over the years for having too much control over too much private information about too many people, the company has meticulously refined its data security, governance and cross-border data transfer flows inside its own systems. “We do it so well on-prem — it’s unbeatable. Can we say the same when we do that in the cloud, and how much testing is enough when it comes to data and data protection?” Godhania said.

Ultimately, as much as the company might trust its cloud partners, the buck stops with Acxiom if data flowing through its applications in the cloud is compromised, she said. “We ask ourselves, what are the benefits? We get speed, we get flexibility, maybe cost down the road, but then weighted against the potential harms for consumers, what could happen if the data was subjected to unauthorized access in these clouds?” Godhania said.

Capital One: It’s ‘showtime’

Some Acxiom customers are particularly exacting about how their data is managed and where it lives. Some stipulate in their contracts that their data must be stored in servers inside the company’s Conway, Arkansas data center as opposed to one of its other locations. Some customers even send inspectors to assess the physical equipment and security apparatuses, something they typically can’t do when it comes to cloud providers’ physical systems.

“They could send somebody down. They can touch the walls. They can crawl under the floor if they wanted to, touch the ceiling. They knew the constraints, saw the cameras — the cloud didn't provide that,” said a former Acxiom data technology exec who was with the company for nearly 26 years until 2021, and asked not to be named.

In general, certain types of customers have adopted the cloud before others. “Automotive, retailers, travel and entertainment — those are verticals who have adopted cloud-based solutions faster than more regulated industry verticals like financial services, insurance, health care, things like that,” said Chad Engelgau, Acxiom’s CEO. Engelgau’s been at Acxiom and IPG-owned marketing and data companies IPG Mediabrands and Kinesso since 2006.

“That journey had been going on for a while, and then once ‘Cap One’ migrated, that really was like, ‘OK, showtime.” —Bhavna Godhania, senior director of Strategic Partnerships at Acxiom

Capital One is an outlier among Acxiom’s financial services customers, though, and insiders say the company had an important influence on Acxiom’s cloud-related efforts. During several transitional years leading up to 2020, when the bank completed its migration to AWS and Snowflake, Capital One’s move to the cloud kicked Acxiom’s cloud efforts into higher gear, in part because it was a large customer with lots of moving parts and strict security demands.

“That journey had been going on for a while, and then once ‘Cap One’ migrated, that really was like, ‘OK, showtime,’” Godhania said.

“It got serious,” said Donatelli, who said that before Capital One decided to go to the cloud, “everybody was talking about it, but no one was doing it in earnest.”

Capital One declined to comment for this story.

‘Down-home' times dwindle for Acxiom sales

When Acxiom bought digital identity company LiveRamp in 2014, it was a visible sign that the old-school data broker was breaking away from its Arkansas roots, excited by the lure of Silicon Valley tech. Acxiom’s longtime chairman and CEO Charles Morgan helped grow the company’s size and footprint to 7,000 employees in nine countries, managing 6 petabytes of data storage by the time he resigned in 2007. But since leaving, Morgan has lamented what he saw as a departure from Acxiom’s traditional culture and customer-centric roots.

"I feel like Acxiom has moved with their CEO and executive team mostly to California now. They have mostly abandoned us here, which I think was a mistake," Morgan told the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in 2017, remarking on a decision by then-CEO Scott Howe to sell Acxiom’s office building in Little Rock. Howe is now CEO of LiveRamp.

A member of the Arkansas Business Hall of Fame, Morgan reminisced in the Democrat-Gazette article about the meaning of the building to the company and its customers. "It helped us grow our relationships with these guys," he said. "We didn't have to drive them up to Conway. We could just take them off the airplane and zip them over to this nice briefing center. And then, of course, we did things like take them to Doe's for steaks and a good, down-home time,” he said. He was talking about Doe's Eat Place, a legendary Arkansas restaurant where diners share 2- and 3-pound T-bones and porterhouse steaks dished up family-style – a far cry from a cappuccino robot.

data center technician walking down hallway of server racks in an acxiom data center An Acxiom data center in an undisclosed location.Acxiom

A tech built for the cloud infringed on the old way of doing things, and its effect on Acxiom was more than cultural. It forced an upheaval of how the company did business.

Some salespeople perceived the cloud as a threat to their livelihood. Accustomed to selling three-year, flat-fee package deals of hardware, software and data management services, their standard contracts weren’t set up for the cloud. Acxiom’s data center management accounted for a substantial portion of contracts, and as customers fed more data into machine learning and business analytics tools, the costs grew.

As the company struggled to compete with cloud platforms designed for those purposes – sometimes at a lower cost – Acxiom would have to rationalize the value of its data infrastructure to clients. And when customers would insist Acxiom merely serve as a middleman between themselves and a chosen cloud provider, it could shrink Acxiom’s revenue by hundreds of thousands of dollars or more each year.

“People would [ask], ‘What's this going to do for my commission? What's this going to do for my bonus? What's this going to do for my career?’” said the former Acxiom exec. He said he eventually left the company in part because it wasn’t moving fast enough to the cloud. “There was a lot of resistance.”

Acxiom has revised arrangements with clients as contracts are renewed in the cloud age. “We do believe when solutions are effectively architected, and the availability of all the necessary components exists within a cloud, we can architect solutions that can lower customer costs, while creating greater flexibility and access to compute and storage, as well as access to a lot of really cool technology that is becoming native in the cloud,” said Engelgau.

Google gets a piece

As the cloud disruption struck fear in the hearts of salespeople back in Arkansas and beyond, Google Cloud put on the charm at its all-day 2019 schmooze-fest for Acxiom. Execs sipped coffee topped with Acxiom logo-adorned foam and listened as Google’s data, engineering and analytics leaders pitched the company’s cloud capabilities and product plans.

“They give you the dog and pony. All these different groups discussed all these capabilities of these tools, the road maps of all these products that were all very much aligned with the kinds of things that Acxiom needs in order to build these databases and to distribute data,” Donatelli recalled about the Google meeting.

Eventually, Google did get an Acxiom win. The company is the primary cloud partner for Acxiom’s Intelligence Hub. Launched in 2021, it’s a home base for ad- and marketing-related applications built by Acxiom data scientists and used by marketing customers for purposes like optimizing ad targeting or visualizing data.

Google, which attracts a significant portion of the world’s digital advertising dollars and controls many of the data pipes advertisers rely on, made sense as the cloud partner for the applications hub, said Shea Heath, Acxiom’s general manager of Solutions and Analytics. “Access and speed of information — with everything being within Google — you can do more things in real-time,” Heath said. “[Google tends] to protect their data. So now we can work in their environment.”

It’s not likely that any single cloud provider will ever get an exclusive deal with Acxiom. But because Acxiom is a marketing-focused data company, Google’s dominance in the ad industry could lead to more tie-ins between the two.

Setting up Acxiom’s services and applications to run on Google’s infrastructure and integrate with its marketing platform to enable data connections needed to target and measure ads delivered by Google, "is fundamentally where the market is going. And therefore, Acxiom absolutely will be there, and is there for a number of use cases today,” Engelgau said.

But whether Acxiom will someday ditch its data centers entirely as big cloud providers like AWS and Google grab more of its data management business is anyone’s guess, even Engelgau’s. “Truthfully, we will probably have our own data centers, and will continue to operate and run client solutions in those for five, eight, 10 years, probably – maybe forever – not sure,” Engelgau said.

These days though, few Acxiom employees need to be, or are even allowed, inside the hulking structures. As Hollaway put it, “I do not physically have to go into the data center. I drive by and wave.”

Enterprise

US issues sweeping new rules on chip-tech exports to China

The Biden administration rolled out new, wide-ranging export controls on the chips and equipment U.S. companies are able to sell to China.

The Biden administration’s new controls on chip exports represent a significant shift in U.S. policy related to China.

Photo: Chen Zhonghao/Xinhua via Getty Images

The U.S. unveiled a set of new regulations Friday that aim to choke off China’s access to advanced chips, the tools necessary to manufacture years-old designs, and the service and support mechanisms needed to keep chip fabrication systems running smoothly.

On a briefing call with reporters Thursday, administration officials said the goal is to block the People’s Liberation Army and China’s domestic surveillance apparatus from gaining access to advanced computing capabilities that require the use of advanced semiconductors. The chips, tools, and software are helping China’s military, including aiding the development of weapons of mass destruction, according to the officials, who asked to remain anonymous to discuss the administration’s policies freely.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

Why CrowdStrike wants to be a broader enterprise IT player

The company, which grew from $1 billion in annual recurring revenue to $2 billion in just 18 months, is expanding deeper within the cybersecurity market and into the wider IT space as well.

CrowdStrike is well positioned at a time when CISOs are fed up with going to dozens of different vendors to meet their security needs.

Image: Protocol

CrowdStrike is finding massive traction in areas outside its core endpoint security products, setting up the company to become a major player in other key security segments such as identity protection as well as in IT categories beyond cybersecurity.

Already one of the biggest names in cybersecurity for the past decade, CrowdStrike now aspires to become a more important player in areas within the wider IT landscape such as data observability and IT operations, CrowdStrike co-founder and CEO George Kurtz told Protocol in a recent interview.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins